Why Is Electronic Voting A Good Idea

I believe mandatory voting would be a good move for elections. However, I do not believe mandatory voting would be good for democracy and freedom. Like

As technology has evolved there have become more ways to cast a vote than ever before. Most people are familiar with the traditional way of

In 2000 Riverside County California decided to spend 14 million dollars to make their voting system all electronic. This decision was made on the basis that in 1998 more than one million dollars was spent on paper ballots (in Riverside), but when only half of the county voted the extras had to be trashed. For local elections their new electronic system fetched a 99% approval rating from voters (Wired.com article). The only foreseeable downside to this technology is the start up price and with internet voting not likely due to security issues, this maybe the best solution.

The United States of America should stick with old school paper ballots. On paper is safe, reliable, cheap, and cannot be tampered with. Protecting your votes should be top priority.

I believe that the use of EVM's is a relatively useful tool needed for the voting process.

Electronic voting machines can be seen as an improvement to many Americans, such as those with disabilities and citizens with a first language other than English. However there are downsides to the new approach that outweigh the benefits of the new voting system coming in to place.

It is better not to use EVMs macines.Voting is a right that has to be taken seriously. It is best to stick to a method that everyone is most comfortable in.The reason why is the cost,time consuming and are not assesible to everyone.

Some believe that electronic voting machines or EVMs are helpful in the use of alderly or people with physical disabilty. While some believe it is to great of risk that it could be hacked. I believe we should have EVMs.

Voting is one of the single most important rights that an American citizen can take advantage of. However, the method of how a voter should cast their ballots has become a topic of controversy in recent years. For centuries, voting polls across the world have relied on simple paper ballots to reach a conclusive result; but, with the introduction of much more efficient electronic voting machines, or "EVMs", the question has risen... Which voting system is superior? In my opinion, EVMs are the superior method of casting a ballot and there are several reasons why I say so.

Voting should be as easy as possible and available to as many people as possible. To accomplish that, we need electronic voting machines.

Most democratic societies are fueled by the power of the people and when the opportunity to use that power is removed you should expect rash repercussions. History has displayed that time and time again. America being the long time democratic leader of the free world has seen many instances where groups within the population felt like their voting rights weren’t being respected. America as a nation has slightly overcame those struggles but currently there are still many obstacles between the average voter and actually casting a vote. Many problems include lack of time, lack of convenience, lack of knowledge, and more. To combat this we have explored the alternatives to the traditional voting in a booth method that is so popular

I believe that Electronnic Voting Machines would be extremely useful to todays society of people, especially in the United States. As the top article has stated, there is 33.7 million people of vating age with disabilities who are unable to get to the voting stands without major difficulty, that's 20 percent less likely to vote, which causes a major difference in the actual amount of people who believe in one topic over another. There is also the concept of having a machine that can change languages per user, so if we were to have a card that had our information on it and our first language than we could also help with the minority that don't know how to speak in English. Though there are plenty of arguments about EVMs being able to get hacked

First of all, a pro to EVMs is that they are disability accessable. They hold a special audio and voice system for the blind and even a more hands-on approach for people who have trouble standing. Therefore, because of accessibility issues 33.7 million disabled citizens are 20% less likely to vote because they do not have access to the proper tools. It would be a great step up in technology for the disabled. Everybody should be able to vote if they wish too.

The idea of a way to vote that is easy for everyone to accopish has been long sought after, and for good reason. Voting is of large importance to our country and can directly effect our future of laws an policies. When a group, such as the elderly, dissabled, and those of minorities, are not able to vote on matters involving their own demographic due to their demographic we reate a systemic issue. Although the theory of an electronic device that caters to all disbilties in voting is pleasing, it comes with many negtive points. EVM machines may not be connected to the internet but they are still easy to hack. Thus proven in 2007 when it was discovered that a basic software could be used to transfer votes from one candidate to the other. Some

EMV'S would be very useful for handicaped people, or people that prefer to use electronicle devices to vote. Therefor by using bolth it will more than likely keep everyone happy aswell as increasing the vote percentage. This way would also make it easier to fix uncorrect votes for there will be less people in that section to have to worry about making things much simpler. Then you also have the factor of people who dont normally use electronicle devices (mostly older generations) that will refuse the service of them ultimately