Why Is Fetal Tissue Research Morally Wrong

Given the choice, would you trade one person for multiple persons, would you give one life to save many? Now imagine that the person is already dead, would you have any objection to using them to cure diseases and save lives. It is highly debated as to whether or not stem cell researchers should be able to use stem cells from aborted babies in the research. A stem cell is defined as an undifferentiated cell of a multicellular organism that is capable of giving rise to indefinitely more cells of the same type, and from which certain other kinds of cell arise by differentiation (Stem cell). In the research stem cells from aborted fetuses or left over fetuses fertilized in in-vitro fertilization are used for medical and research purposes (Stem cell research). Stem cell research could be used to cure many diseases.

Most people are against Embryonic Stem Cell research mainly because they consider it unethical to use aborted fetuses for research. The two main issues concerning the research are the ethics (Cons) and the benefits (Pros). In any scientific case, ethics must always be considered. But the use of fetuses is something that is of the utmost importance. The costs are generally measured based off of people’s feelings, morals, and knowledge about the subject up for debate. The use of aborted fetuses for stem cell research may have many positive outcomes that can come of it, but many negative outcomes as well; If using aborted fetuses for research can, in the near future, save lives, then it is a research that should be supported, even though some

But anti-abortion activists have also scored big when it comes to blocking new medical research that may lead to better contraceptives and earlier medical abortions; like RU 486, as well stem cell research for the treatments for numerous diseases. “Fetal tissue research, for instance, has led to advances in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injuries, diabetes and leukemia. Despite the fact that organs from the corpses of murder victims can be donated, antiabortion activists believe tissue donation from aborted fetuses encourages abortion and should therefore be prohibited,” (Hontz,1998) .

By taking the stem cells from the embryos we’re stopping a human to develop, which means we kill it. This is against human rights and is also against God. most likely the human that is in need of the treatment has already lived while the embryo has not. Why not give a chance to a new human to be able to live? abortion cannot be permitted or projected to people as a good act. By letting these treatments take place we are promoting abortion. We can't let abortion be seen as a medical treatment, abortion is

That separates the decision to terminate a pregnancy from any research that it might later contribute to. So there’s no “maximiz[ing] the value of body parts,” as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie claimed, to “sell on the open market for profit.” (On Abortion: A Lincoln Position). A number of Republican candidates in the debates, from businessman Donald Trump to Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, suggested that what’s wrong with fetal tissue research is that it expresses disrespect for human life. “I believe that we should have a culture of life,” as Florida Gov. Jeb Bush put it, reminding voters that “we ended partial birth abortion” and “were the first state to do a ‘choose life’ license plate.” The Supreme Court has indeed held that government can regulate in ways designed to promote respect for the unborn, even if doing so saves none. It’s easy to understand how it expresses respect for human life, for example, to restrict the use of fetal tissue for trivial purposes like producing cosmetics, or even insufficiently worthy reasons like teaching high school biology. (Stem Cell Research: Medical Miracle or Moral

Planned Parenthood is illegally selling fetal tissue, fetal parts, and overall the Company's directors don’t care for these illegal actions because it’s extra money. Human being’s deserve a life even in the womb life matters. Fetals have a word too not just the person behind the knife.

There are several laws that restrict, but don’t completely ban advancements on the use of aborted fetuses for stem cell research. Closely related to stem cell research from embryonic cells is human cloning, which is in most states is not governmentally funded or is illegal. Lives of innocent children that are yet to even have a voice are lost every time a scientist uses an embryo for stem cell research. The embryonic cells are not taken with out consent from the parents. The cells can come from either an aborted child in the early stages of the pregnancy or from embryos that are left over from

The Pro-Life act of 2015 and 2016 is a proposed policy in the United States that is currently a bill which stands for the act of being against all methods of child abortion. This bill gives the Public Health Service Act the power to prohibit fetal tissue to be exchanged for scientific research, or payments that may include the surgical implanting, transporting, or storing fetal tissue (). Even though the fetal tissues that are used to help cure diseases, it is still using the tissues of what could have been a living offspring. As you are curing a life you are taking life away from another living being. This bill has been recently issued this year, because abortion is now becoming more common trend in the United States of America.() It is at the moment under the debate between the Democrats who believe in the Pro Choice Movement and the Republicans side with Pro Life. The bill has not been passed yet, but later on in 2016 we should see if it gets passed by the senate or not.

In my opinion using aborted fetal tissue for embryonic stem cell research is ethical. Even though my Catholic beliefs teach that life starts at conception I still have my own opinion. Human dignity is a term that states that because we are made in the image and likeness of God, we have value and worth. Though the fetus has a heartbeat, it has no human emotions or conscience. If you were to end what may have become a human to help a living human not suffer their entire life, what you have done was good. My opinion and my reasoning are my own, everyone can have an opinion on this matter, which needs further discussion in the scientific community and in the

Across America, doctors in the field of abortion perform perfectly legal and constitutionally protected procedures everyday that result in the removal of unwanted fertilized embryos from a woman. For years these fetuses were terminated and discarded in a safe manner, with no further study or research done on the unborn child. Now, scientists have begun harvesting key cells from the fetuses before they are

This research has a lot of risks, but the potential outcomes are spectacular. The production of embryonic stem cells could help so many people. People could theoretically be created new tissue for them to use if lost. The immune system, in theory, should not reject the new tissue, due to it being an exact copy. This has been a major concern when it comes to any kinds of transplants. This could resolve that issue and save many lives in the process.

The most significant argument against embryo research is that an embryo should be treated as a human being, which would make embryo research equivalent to murder. According to Leis (2010), “The use of human embryos or fetuses as an object of experimentation constitutes a crime against their dignity as human beings who have a right to the same respect owed to a child once born, just as to every person” (p. 111). This means that we should not be creating a human life with the intention of destroying it. According to the Natural Law, the body of a human being from the very first stage of its existence can never

The researchers did not force anyone to have an abortion. I am personally for choice on abortion but to me that has no bearing on this topic. A couple has already made the choice to abort the embryo and scientists are helping Americans by performing stem cell research. By doing this we understand life more and how our existence came to be. This research is also cost efficient because all they do is take already aborted fetuses. People feel this is wrong because it was going to be a lie human being that they are running test on. Put in the end I would rather have scientist-performing experiments on aborted fetuses then live humans or even live

Fifty years ago, people could only dream of having the knowledge to repair damaged organs and cure diseases that take the lives of millions every year. Although it does seem far fetched, dozens of years ago people didn’t think we would ever have the capability to transfer organs, but through decades of research, we were able to achieve that dream. Despite the possibilities it offers, we haven’t been able to get far with stem cell research because of how much controversy and opposition it faces. While abortion is morally wrong to many, stem cell research could help save lives by giving us cures for cancer, helping further the ability to repair damaged organs, and reversing disabilities.

Embryonic stem cells are usually harvested from leftover fetuses from fertility clinics, although at times there are embryos created for research purposes. The controversy regarding the harvesting of stem cells from fetuses are high, since some people view this action as unethical as it can be viewed as taking a life of an innocent. While the other side argues it is more ethical to make use of unborn fetuses to help other patients who are alive and are in need of stem cells. Using stillborn fetuses is accepted within ethical