Why Is Frederick The Great Effective

As a conclusion Peter the Great of Russia should receive the title of “Most Absolute Monarch” because he was wise, yet cruel. He created Russia's navy, but required an education before the men could join. He was fond of physical labor and didn't mind putting his men through it. Peter also westernized the entire country of Russia. Since beards were not a fashion in westernization, Peter made it mandatory for all of his nobleman to shave their beards off. He wanted Russia to be westernized completely. Peter was very strong and was not afraid of anyone's criticism. When his people tried to overthrow him (which was multiple times), it usually ended with mass executions. Peter had to let everyone know who was boss. He even interrogated his own son because of faulty reasoning. He also was a very strong Protestant Christian and made everyone follow him as a Christian. To get down to it, if things didn't go Peter's way, it all ended

During the XVII century, most of the European countries were ruled by more or less absolute Monarchy. Born in 1638, Louis XIV will have the longest reign out of all French ruler ( 72 years). A few years later, while Louis XIV’s reign was at his apogee, another important ruler of this era get to the throne: Peter the Great. Both of these rulers, known for being an absolute monarch, have been influenced by the traumatic event of their childhood. For Louis XIV, it was the insurrection of the nobility against the royal power, known as the Fronde; Forced to flee Paris, he will hold a grudge against this feudal power . As for Peter The Great, it was the rebellion led by his step-sister, after the death of his brother with whom he ruled as Tsar, that will influence his way of ruling the kingdom.

Every con has its pro. In the same way that a student may not be good in math, but uses his/her talent to excel in English, Fredrick Douglass turned his suffering and disadvantages into motivations. Throughout the novel, three main points indicated the weaknesses behind his strengths: being denied the right to read, being beaten without mercy, and being snatched away from his loved family and friends.

Was Philip II of Spain a successful absolute monarch during his rule? Many people believe he had what it took to be absolute monarch, but there were several constraints he faced as a ruler in Spain. Philip II was known for building one of the largest empires from creating effective domestic and foreign policies to gain leadership of his kingdom instead of the local authorities in charge, but he did face problems while ruling the kingdom. His addressed many of these policies, such as the policy against the Turks, but there were also many policies that were humiliating to his rule in power. Philip II faced many problems, some of them as a result of his policies and some of them were to fix his problems while in power.

Catherine the Great was an amazing ruler and because of the changes that she made and the opportunities that she made available, she also made Russia great. Although she was a strict ruler, she did it for the good of her

Correspondingly, in Prussia, the next Hohenzollern was Frederick the Great, who applied enlightened absolutist ideas to the economy. Frederick took a more humane approach to policy, which would strengthen the state, and he also reconstructed agriculture and industry. Altogether, the monetary and financial systems these enlightened rulers employed were to make more money. More financial capabilities would result in a stronger state, due to the ability to accomplish more goals, and a better life for the rulers’

When it came to reforming her own government, she made sure to surround herself with those that actually had the best interest of the territories in mind. Some of those she credited with her success as a ruler were, Johann Christoph von Bartenstein, Count Friedrich Wilhelm von Haugwitz, Emanuel Silva-Tarouca, and Ignaz von Koch. She wrote, “Bartenstein and Haugwitz gave me what I needed for the State and the preservation of the Monarchy. Tarouca and Koch supplied me with consolation, counsel and private information for my own knowledge and correction." It was not by pure luck that Maria Theresa was able to keep her kingdom alive during the beginning of her unexperienced reign. At first, she was reluctant to make changes even though she

Only a small number of people in the world have ever earned the title, "Great". Alexander III of Macedonia is one of lucky few. Alexander the Great started his reign in Macedonia at the age of twenty after his father was assassinated. He then proceeded to expand his kingdom to the largest in the world. So, just how great was he? Alexander the Great was an undeniably brilliant military strategist, yet you could still argue that he doesn't deserve his title because of his cruel treatment of his conquered people and massive ego. This paper will cover his greatness, not-so-greatness, and why he can be a little bit of both.

Frederick II won many wars because he had great formation, and because he had a smart army, but also many times he got lucky and won the war. When he went to go start a war with the russians there didn't pay attention to him. The Russians were focused on the prussia, and the australians were mostly focused on the Silesia. Prussia survived the war with the Russians. Frederick found out how exposed his dominions were, all though there extent allowed the to abandon territory and thus to trade to trade space for the vital time

Frederick II, known as the Great (1740-1786), was one of the best educated and most cultured monarchs of the 18th century, well versed in the enlightenment, and for a time, Frederick seemed quite willing to follow the philosophes’ recommendations for reform; he established a single code of laws for his territories that eliminated the use of torture except in treason and murder cases, also granting limited freedom of speech and other freedoms. The Austrian Empire

Frederick’s justification for taking the Kingship is that he was trying to restore peace and protect the Protestants in Bohemia. He claims that the Protestants were being victimized and that if he did not assume control in Bohemia then the blame for any more lives lost in the conflict could be placed on him. He explains why him taking control should not be seen as a power grab in the following quote:

When Frederick first inherited his father’s successions, he found Prussia. Because he wanted a large, strong army, Prussia became the prefect source. It was small with open-territory and no frontiers to defend. The army had 30,000 men by 1688 with its peak of 40,000 men.

Maria Theresa became the queen of Hungary and Bohemia at the early age of 23 after her father Charles VI died in 1740. As the last Habsburg prince, Charles VI created the Pragmatic Sanction, in which an agreement was made with nearby countries to allow him to pass his crown to a female heir due to fear of him not having a son, especially

It was impossible for Frederick to tell when he had been born or who his father was because he was born to a slave mother. According to Frederick’s former master, “such inquiries on the part of a slave improper and impertinent” (Douglass 236). This means that slaves were not to know because it showed that they had a “restless spirit,” or a troublesome mindset that could potentially grow to wanting freedom or more knowledge (Douglass 236). In doing so, it becomes harder to control slaves. Those considered slaves, or are slaves, are not told of any personal details other than what time they were to be used, this includes birthday, age, and in most cases, parents. Infants, as in the case of Frederick, are taken away from their maternal parents,

For my part, Frederick the Great – a great general as well as a skilled absolute monarch – was one of the most effective absolute monarchs of his time. I think he was an effective absolute monarch because of his contribution to the small but militarily powerful German state of Prussia in becoming an absolute monarchy. The rise of Prussia between 1600s and 1700s occurred as a result of a combination of military, political, and social factors lead by Frederick's contribution. I chose Frederick II as a great effective absolute monarch based on his actions that affected his people. He did many great things for the significance of his absolute monarchy. Frederick II of Prussia made reforms and changes that were ideas of the Enlightenment. He wanted to further his country and