Why Is Gun Control Bad

There are an abundance of causes and effects in the way guns are used, purchased, and sold – legally or illegally. A few causes include how guns are kept (with a safety and locked away or not), and in the way guns are obtained. The effects of these acts are, peoples state of mind, and the criticisms law enforcement may receive. Thought of as technical and firm, the laws about guns can easily be bypassed by criminals and people who are not in the right frame of mind.

Many people around the United States are victims of shootings, whether they be school shootings, mass shootings, or Terrorist Attacks. There seem to be two common ideas either support or oppose gun control. In the United States, many gun control supporters believe that guns are the reason mass shootings happen while gun control opponents believe that people are the cause of mass shootings. But they both want the people in the United States to be safe, whether that is from government tyranny, mass shootings, gun violence, or mental health.

Throughout this paper I will be challenging the arguments of Jeff McMahan’s paper Why Gun ‘Control Is Not Enough where he concludes that the only effective form of gun ‘control’ would be for The United States to make it illegal to shoot a gun of any type. He begins this argument by citing the “central pillar” of the argument for those who are anti-gun control is that when more individuals own guns, there is a mindset that the entire population is safer. With this logic, it can be inferred that citizens feeling unsafe in the current environment of their country are those seeking protection, one way being through the purchase and ownership of a firearm. Safety is imperative part of ensuring peace of mind, which then impact the peace of the

Over the past couple of years, gun control has become a major issue in politics in reaction to horrific public shootings involving government buildings and even elementary school children. There have been many heated debates regarding the effectiveness and constitutionality of gun control from both sides of the political spectrum. Although some argue that gun control will lead to a decrease in crime, guns allow individuals to protect themselves when law enforcement cannot, concealed carry helps prevent crime, and the fact that guns are not responsible for crimes caused.

The recent terrorist situations in America could have turned out differently if the victims had been armed. There have been too many terrorist situations lately in America. Many people who are not in favor of gun rights want to make it more difficult or even impossible for citizens to purchase weapons. When stricter gun control is enforced, then citizens may not be able to protect themselves. We need to find a way to prevent gun related tragedies, but that does not involve taking guns away from citizens (Hockley). We need more guns in the hands of citizens, then they will be able to protect themselves during violent crimes (Goldberg). The call for increased gun rights in America is vital for the safety

The gun control debate has grown more heated than ever after the February 14th school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. The question on everyone’s minds is, does America still need the second amendment? The answer may be yes, but it needs to be more restrictive than it is now. For example, one can buy an assault rifle when they are 18 but cannot drink or buy a handgun until they are 21 years old. Why can someone be able to buy an AR-15 when they are considered not mentally ready to consume alcohol? Why are ordinary citizens allowed to buy an assault rifle at all? Gun control should be more restrictive because studies have proven that America is far more prone to gun violence, which is most likely caused by Americans having an excess of firearms. However, the background check is not necessary.

- For decades gun control has always been a very controversial issue in America. The Second Amendment states it is an individual's right to bare arms and by having stronger laws on guns, that would only be taking their right away, However, we have seen violent crimes rise due to guns, we have seen many people lose their lives and get hurt. Americans should be for gun control because it can help prevent school shootings, stronger regulations can help stop gun loopholes, and stronger laws can make it harder for people that have a bad record to get a gun. With the enormous amount of violence in today's society, individuals need to take a stand demanding stricter regulations on guns.

David Thweatt, superintendent of the Harrold Independent School District, says, “Violence could happen anywhere. There are as many ways to address school safety as there are schools in Texas.” A recurring subject is the reliability of the teachers. As for their reliability, “...armed teachers would have to be volunteers who pass strict psychological testing, and go through at least as much training in firearms and the judicious use of deadly force as current laws demand of armed security guards” (Ayoob). Officer John Diamond also states that these volunteer staff members would be thoroughly investigated. The country’s current most common prevention tactic is to hire on-site police officers. “It costs $45,000 per officer annually to do this. With a large school like Mentor High, which isn’t even the largest high school in the state, a lot of security officers are needed. The numbers add up quickly to create an enormous sum.”

quite lengthy and detailed. It can either sound like paradise or a nightmare depending on where you stand on the topic. You might be a lot like me and are for owning any gun you want. Others, unlike me,

In my opinion, gun manufacturers have a duty to warn gun users of the dangers of using guns. Some say no, because such dangers are open and obvious and that, generally, there is no duty to warn of open and obvious dangers. I believe the danger warning would be effective in preventing some if not most gun-related accidents. Sometimes the most obvious gun accidents are the ones being ignored just because they seem obvious doesn’t mean that they are less likely to occur.

Gun control is one of the most important issues debated worldwide, but most importantly in the United States. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, the citizens have the right to bear arms, yet this has become an issue that has remained debatable for decades in congress meetings.

Guns do not only protect people when they are out in the public, but also in their homes. "In fact, because many Americans keep guns in their homes, burglars in the United States spend more time than burglars in other countries "casing" a house to ensure that nobody is home." (Lott). These burglars are casing, or examining a house before they rob it, because they are afraid that the household they want to rob has a gun inside it. In the United States, owning guns is more common, so that is something the burglars must take into consideration. Because many Americans have guns in their households, it can significantly reduce their chances of getting robbed. Even if the person who has a gun in their household does not use it to hurt the burglar,

Should guns be gone for good in Illinois? The idea that guns should be illegal has been on peoples mind for a very long time. There have been many arguments to ban guns from various states and to keep guns from being used at all. Guns are good and bad and in this essay you will learn some reason why guns are good and why guns are bad. Now im not saying that all guns should be destroyed. Law enforcement officers should have a standard issue side arm with them at all time while on duty. Here in Illinois we have very strict gun laws for example you must own a FOID card, Firearms Owner Identification and they are one of the hardest I.D’s to forge. The 2nd amendment states” A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,

I dont don guns obligation be expropriated broadly immigrant around kinsmen for the sake what involving hunters and relations who solely allied to blade, is it okay for their pertinent to be taken away because of the actions of others, when they havent done any wrong. This is three occasion of a inelegant affair digress you contain with regard to into consideration when discussing gat mete out. Peoples opinon on pistol implement varies from the others opinionsss. Divers relations tone focus enclosing heater sine qua non be felonious, numerous m tone turn guns arent the problem in the U.S variegated relations air saunter faultless blood shouldnt have a go guns, various relations feel turn relatives shouldnt have certain guns, and Varied relations feel differently.

Would reducing the number of gun owners in the US increase or lower the overall crime rate? If only but registered, trained, professionals had firearms, there would be virtually no shootings throughout the country. The US would be a safe place and only law enforcement or other authoritative figures would own these kind of tools. This would also help with police brutality, because police officers would not have an excuse to shoot unarmed civilians, and they could be charged more heavily for racial profiling. If everyone had guns, there would be even more shootings over simple arguments and other unimportant strifes. The country would be made into an even more dangerous place. Crises like the recent massacre in Las Vegas would become common. Unfortunately, the government is trying to handle this problem as if they were pulling weeds. The authorities need to take firm action and responsibility to enforce and increase the number of firearm restriction laws. As for regular citizens, people should sign local petitions in their communities so the government can intervene to invoke more gun control laws despite excuses from organizations like the National Rifle Association (NRA).