Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Wrong

Ray Bradbury once said, “After Hiroshima was bombed, I saw a photograph of the side of a house with shadows of the people who had lived there burned into the wall from the intensity of the bomb. The people were gone, but their shadows remained.” Keep in mind that quote only described the intensity of “Little Boy”, the nickname for the bomb that devastated Hiroshima. The bombs that dilapidated both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were harrowing, gruesome, and in all sincerity, needless. The reasoning people have given to justify the bombings was because it was a military necessity; they thought the atom bombs were needed to save lives and to end the war quickly. However, the Merriam-Webster dictionary explicitly defines a ‘military necessity’ as “the necessity attending belligerent military operations that is held to justify all measures necessary to bring an enemy to complete submission excluding those (as cruelty, torture, poison, perfidy, wanton destruction) that are forbidden by modern laws and customs of war.” According to this interpretation of a ‘military necessity’, both of the bombings do not match this definition. Various people wonder why the U.S. would condone the use of the explosives and inflict such destruction on others, considering that they had first hand experiences on devastating attacks that seemed gratuitous. Many have argued that there were multiple alternatives to such a catastrophe, and the bombs did not have to be utilized. Others state that the bombings were

On August 6, 1945 a B-29 bomber dropped the first deployed atomic bomb on Hiroshima. This day an estimated 80,000 people were instantly killed when the bomb was dropped , 90% of the city was destroyed and thousands died afterwards from radiation exposure. Three days later a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and about 40,000 were killed there, forcing Emperor Hirohito to an unconditional surrender. A question still lingers about today “Should we have dropped the bomb on Hiroshima?”, now one could argue both sides on the subject but I’ll be on the side of which we should not have dropped the bomb.

The two days in August 1945 should been engraved in the minds of every single American individual. The bombs that were dropped on the approximant 200,000 innocent Japanese citizens is indeed a war crime, and many people tend to overlook that fact. Nobody was even held accountable for the horrible bombings even though it’s clearly a crime against humanity. A survivor by the name of Akiko Takakura was only twenty years old when she experienced the horrific Hiroshima bombing in 1945. In an interview, she recounted what she saw that day saying, “Many people on the street were killed almost instantly. The fingertips of those dead bodies caught fire and the fire gradually spread over their entire bodies from their fingers. A light gray liquid dripped down their hands, scorching their fingers.

Two atomic bombs were dropped by the United States on Japan in order to stop World War II. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. The second atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. These were the deadliest bombings in history.

In August of 1941, the United States of America dropped two atomic bombs on the nation of Japan. The bombings decimated the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Thousands were left either dead, wounded, homeless, or scarred for life. The bombings also brought World War II to an end and prevented a full-scale invasion japan which surely would have result in the death of more Americans, but was it justified. Over the years many ethicists have argued on whether or not the bombings were, in fact, necessary and justified. Both sides have provided strong arguments for their respective opinions, but after careful examination and thought I have come to a conclusion. I believe that the dropping of the Atomic bomb on Japan may not have been ethical based on both deontological and utilitarian arguments.

The war with Germany had already came to an end due to the strength of the allies, but Japan wouldn’t give up. War with Japan drug on, even though Japan was outnumbered. This proved that a bloody end was the only route to take. America understood that the country with the highest amount of technological warfare and least casualties was going to win. The whole war the United States used high tec bombs and planes, but nothing compared to what was to come. The atomic bomb was the way of meeting those needs. The atomic bomb had never and to this day, has never been used in combat (Miner 2-4). The United States felt that Japan brought this upon themselves by bombing Pearl Harbor in 1941, bringing us into World War II, and not giving up (Garner 4). When deciding where to drop the bomb, it was obvious that Hiroshima was a key place. Being flat, the bomb radiation would spread causing more damage (Stover 4). Also, Hiroshima was a Japanese army based, so if this didn’t cause the end of the war, many of the enemy's supplies would be ruined. (Garner 4). Three days after the bombing another atomic bomb was dropped on another Japanese town, Nagasaki. This bomb was a lot less famous as Hiroshima, but it was also very destructive and deadly. No one would ever imagined the extent of these awful weapons.

During the Second World War, at approximately 8:15am on August 6th 1945, the United States of America dropped the first ever nuclear bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. On August 9th , a second bomb was dropped on the industrial city of Nagasaki, three days after the initial bombing. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was such a disastrous event in our history that has subsequently caused both advantages and disadvantages to the world we currently live in. Throughout this essay the positive and negative affects of the atomic bombing will be investigated, as well as examining how the use of the atomic bomb helped to create a stable democracy and economy in Japan as well as ending the Second World War. Conversely it will also examine how the bomb not only produced mass destruction, but its long term health effects and the initiation of

The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima (August 6th 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9th 1945) remains among the most controversial events in modern history. At the time, the dropping of the atomic bombs was both strategically and morally justified, yet today it is a hotly debated topic, thought to be excessive or unnecessary. However, the dropping of the atomic bombs, while an atrocious act, was in fact the lesser of two evils. The alternative was to prolong one of the bloodiest conflicts in global history, and allow for the slaughter of many more

John Hersey once said, “What has kept the world safe from the bomb since 1945 has not been deterrence, in the sense of fear of specific weapons, so much as it 's been memory. The memory of what happened at Hiroshima”. Early morning on August the 6th 1945, the United Sates dropped atomic bombs into the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The “Little Boy” bomb which was equivalent to 20,000 tons of TNT, destroyed most of the city and killed about 130,000 people. There were few people who survived after this traumatic event, and they suffered the horrible burns from explosion, as well as the radiation illness. One year later, John Jersey, a writer American, published “Hiroshima” as an article on The New Yorker which told the story of 6 people who

In early August of 1945, the world was at war for almost 6 years. August 6th, 1945 the United States dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and three days later dropped another on Nagasaki. This was a significate point in history because there has never been a bomb of this magnitude being use in an urban industrial area. Ultimately the use of the atomic bomb resulted in Japan’s surrender, which aided the allies in drawing closer to ending the war against the Axis Powers. Due to the massive destruction industrially and urbanely the use of the atomic bomb has always been questioned. Overall, there has always been a debate whether or not the act of dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki justifiable due so the fact that it killed so many citizens of Japan. In order to understand this difficult topic, one must look at the subject at hand from two difference perspectives of considering the act of using the atomic bomb unjustifiable and a war crime and claims that the atomic bomb was a necessary act while fighting since the world was at war.

The two atomic bombs that were dropped on Japan are forever remembered today as a changing moment in history. The United States dropped the atomic bomb called “Little Boy” on Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945. Only three days later, on August 9th, 1945, the second atomic bomb called “Fat Man” was dropped on Nagasaki (MacKain, 229). These have been the only times that nuclear weapons have been used in war. These bombs have been questioned throughout history; was it moral or immoral? However, the bombs were definitely a moral decision which ultimately saved numerous lives (Atomic Heritage Foundation). The atomic bombing of Japan was a military success, and arguably a moral decision because it was less harmful than the fire bombings, and helped the country immeasurably.

August 6, 1945, Hiroshima, around 8:15 AM, nearly 80,000 people face the wrath of United States, and pay with their lives to a bomb nicknamed “little boy”. Another is dropped, “fat man”, and another 36,00 perish (Shi 1127). The events that unfolded that day have been, and will continue to be argued for eternity, however, ethics aside, draws strong connections to a growing militarized world and the concern that comes with such advancements. In modern times, the aforementioned

The United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 in order to bring a swift end to the most bloody war in human history. World War 2 killed millions of people, including over 400,000 American soldiers and civilians. President Truman ordered the attack on Japan because he believed that Japan would not surrender in any other way. However, the use of the atomic bombs led to unnecessary bloodshed, and an alternative solution to the end of the war should have been sought out by the American government.

fighting a three front war: one front in the Pacific, one front in Europe, and

History has been teaching humans from ages; the pros and cons of every success and failure in all possible aspects of life. One of the unforgettable acts that we regret is bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It does not concern only the citizen of Japan rather it concerns the whole of human society sustaining life on this planet. Though unwillingly