Throughout history, people have banded together within their nations to gain independence from a higher authority. In some cases, violence is necessary to gain sovereignty, but in other cases violence is destroying nations. People denied of the rights and personal freedoms under an unjust government often resort to violent revolutions and wars. They see using force as in the most effective way of relieving themselves of their situation. According to Norman Finkelstein “International law says people fighting for self-determination can use force in order to achieve independence”. Finkelstein is stating how our laws allow us to use violence to gain self-autonomy for many nations worldwide. I agree with Norman Finkelstein to a certain extent with his opinion towards fighting for sovereignty. When it comes to violence people always take it seriously and it draws attention to what's happening, using your words won't …show more content…
For example, during the French Revolution people protested against the monarchy and how they choose to rule. The king and queen ignore the protests which escalated the citizens of France and resulted in a violent revolution. For the king and queen to finally take notice of what the citizens want it took a violent riot outside of their castle to slaughter the guards and hunt down the queen. During modern-day problems, the media plays a huge role in exposing the situation and showing the severity of the matter. When people watch the news they don't listen for the peaceful protests they listen for the wars in the violence in what seems the most exciting. The media will always prioritize the violent revolution over the peaceful problem-solving. Sadly, in our society today violence draws the most attention. This goes to show that in order to turn people's heads towards your protest, violence is one of the most effective
The media controls the way the public views a controversial event. It can create the illusion that everything is perfect by leaving out important information, or can reveal the deplorable truth as the media did during the Civil Rights Movement. It was not always that way though, during the Colonial Era the media glossed over the brutality African Americans
Although the media is not directly asking people to riot, the media has to accept responsibility for the way they reported a story before that story was tried in a court of law.
Given everything that has been going on in this country, people turn to hate crimes and rioting thinking it is the best solution to solve every problem given to us by the government and the media. One of the big problems is the media, whether it be the news on TV or the internet, they contort every problem to conform to what they want there viewers to believe. As one of my college professors told me “sometimes the media has to create their own problems so they can cover the story” (Riggenbach), ok something like that. For example, there was a story on the news where someone caught a cop shooting what looked like a homeless man. Since more people watch the news on TV versus reading a story on a website they don't get the whole thing. What had
Violent protests create negative impacts on movements through the vast media coverage which then can hinder that movement’s positive growth and influence on its community. Protest that turn violent cause citizens lose their right to assemble and are injecting negative connotations to their purpose. In the United States, where the idea of advocating for individual rights and representation of a community has pushed it to strive for a proactive democracy, peaceful protests are widely encouraged in order to promote and protect the health, prosperity, and safety of American
Does the media really know what the public at large really wants to hear about? News media outlets will be quick to cover some extreme violent situation and keep reporting about said issue over and over and give their personal opinion. At times, they will only give you what the facts that
These violent protests are usually intended to affect immediate change, but rarely do more than incite rage against the protesters. Occasionally, such as in the case of the French or American revolutions, these protests create a lasting difference within a nation. It is more likely, however, such as in the case of Ferguson Missouri, that the local or national authorities will crack down on the protesters and that over time these protests are thought of as unnecessarily violent and ineffective. It is my opinion that an aggressive approach to enacting change generally becomes a needless danger to the everyday citizen. An exception to this rule are those protests and revolutions that provide freedom and aide to those who need
We cannot turn on our televisions or get on social media without hearing about recent protests. Some peaceful and some violent, but what difference do the two make? We all have seen riots and we’ve seen how they can end: a spray of rubber bullets, dogs digging their teeth into screaming people’s legs, and the trashing of public places. We’ve seen the sit-ins and marches filled with people that have no fear in holding their signs high and proud. To some violence seems like the only answer, but the results are not as rewarding nor as long lasting. Although some may believe violence is the only answer they are turning a blind eye because nonviolent protests are more successful, get more government support, and gather more civilians around the cause.
Everyday millions of people turn on their television sets, smart phones, laptops, etc; only to be bombarded by the media. The problem is that the media manipulates a lot of the information that they broadcast to their viewers and they do so by numerous methods. One method that the media uses to manipulate information is by using propaganda. The Baltimore Riots and the riots at Ferguson were both representations of propaganda. In both instances a controversial event occurred but the media only displayed one side of the story. The media does this to influence the attitude of the community to toward one side. Another method the media uses to manipulate information is by advertising. Manipulative adverting uses promises of desired results to convince
In any violent protesting event there will be many casualties. But on some level individuals must realize that these sacrifices are made to create equality for years to come. The individuals slain were donating their lives to the cause to make the world a better place. By looking at current social protests the Black Lives Matter Movement may come immediately to mind. This is a violent movement that arose quickly in the media due to that. Protestors from this movement are publicly creating their point and gathering support and attention nationwide which may lead to a change in policy (Tuttle). With change as the ultimate end result this method is successful in obtaining this. Reacting to oppression with violence is not only physically effective, but visually effective. It draws attention to the situation and declares that bystanders must take a side. It invokes emotion, whether it be anger, passion, fear, or guilt, and motivates people to take either side of the oppressor or the oppressed. Either way, it draws attention to the
Have you ever watched the news and saw something you didn't 100% agree with. Well most people just let it slip by while other decide to do something about. Some people might go a little crazy and do something very bad but then you have those who peacefully do it. It may be something very small like one person sitting on the grass so someone can't step there or if could be something big like a mob shutting down a street. For example the 2016 presidential election. When Donal Trump was elected president many people protested by walking the streets so many people did so that they shut down many street and highways even a freeway. The peoples voices were heard for days something was done about it. There was a recount later on which is still in process. This did not hurt anybody and for the people who did
It summons attention, but not for the right reasons. Humans are drawn to violence because it has been seen as entertainment, but is quickly forgotten, which makes it unsuccessful. Violence masks the issue at hand. The DAPL nonviolent protests gained national attention because protesters were being attacked for no reason. They were standing for something that they viewed as just, and were brought down because others saw their argument as petty. The Women's Marches across the world this past month drew huge amounts of media coverage, not because they were violent, but because of the amount of people present, who were peacefully standing up for their sisters, mothers, grandmothers, or themselves, and against a government who wouldn't acknowledge that they were to blame. Protesters were able to peacefully bring to attention the fact that half the world is still oppressed, and the world
A protest is a formal declaration of opposition. Not only do protests catch the media's eye, they can stir revolutionary movements and halt the government's actions. Peaceful protesting is very beneficial. Protesting draws attention to the public as well as the media, calls for a change in the government, and unites people of common interests and beliefs.
In 2009, I decided I wanted to be on birth control, even though I did not fully know my body or complete family history. Soon after, I suffered from a Pulmonary Embolism, a blood clot in my lung. The shortness of breath and severe agonizing chest pains were almost too horrible to bare. My life almost came to a screeching halt. It was then I found out my family suffered from a genetic disorder and my mother realized we needed more open communication. Having open communication with in the family positively influenced our family structure, in ways I could never have imagined. Now I felt safe and secure in asking my mother everything; sex, love, school, whatever it be. Parent and child relationships are a key factor in an adolescences’ social development and journey towards autonomy. Our textbook, Exploring Lifespan development (Berk, 2010), states that “teenagers still need guidance and protection from dangerous situations. In diverse ethnic groups and cultures, warm, supportive parenting that grants young people freedom to explore while making appropriate demands for maturity fosters autonomy, […] favorable self-esteem, and ease of separation in the transition to college” (p. 329). Open discussion with the family and adequate education are necessary to helping adolescents achieve a high standard of sexual education and autonomy.
At the level of individuals, violence is a cleansing force. It frees the native from his inferiority complex and from his despair and inaction; it makes him fearless and restores his self-respect. [. . .] When the people have taken violent part in the national liberation they will allow no one to set themselves up as "liberators." (The Wretched of the Earth 94)
Autonomy: Refers to a style of management or corporate business structure where managers have the freedom to make decisions in the normal course of business. People like to be self-direct and have freedom in their own work. People are tend to be more motivated by autonomy, and people decide what they want to work on and with whom. Workers show the results of their work that day in a fun meeting, this one day of total autonomy has produced a large number of new products and fixes to problems. Autonomy is the desire to be self-directed, as a general rule, jobs with high degree of autonomy engender a sense of responsibility and greater job satisfaction in the employees.