Why Is It Important To Read Nutritional Labels?

Research shows that when such information is given, customers use it to limit the way they eat. This can consume an average loss of calories than they typically did before labeling. This trend poses increased risk, not just in terms of calories, but in terms of unhealthful ingredients such as fat and sodium. According to the passage, "the U.S. government agrees that restaurant meals should be labeled. It is part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, which requires that standard menu items include information on nutrition 1". This poses that fast food places and restaurants should in fact label information, not only for ones own health but it is required.

If you were to go to a restaurant, you would want to know what the nutritional values of the food were, would you not? The labels you see on bags of potato chips or a drink are called nutritional labels (also known as food labels), which show you how much calories, proteins, fats, or a lot more that the item has. In fact, the government made it illegal to make products to sell at stores without the nutritional label. Did you know that restaurants are not required by law to have a label on any of their products? The government needs to make a law to make restaurants put the nutritional values on their foods.

America has been faced with the growing obesity epidemic. This is becoming very wide spread among all races and class levels due in part to the abundance of inexpensive food available and how easily people are becoming persuaded to but things they do not need. David Zinczenko published article “Don’t Blame the Eater”, Zinczenko argues that fast-food industries are not doing their job to provide clear enough nutritional information for hazardous food.

It is the United States Government’s responsibility to value public health and attempt to remedy the problem of obesity. Although obesity is clearly a problem in America, the government has yet to play a key role in being a part of the solution. The government has the power and the resources to improve public health, yet it allows the food industry to continue with harmful and deceitful practices. If the government does choose to impose stricter regulations on the food industry, it will be faced with many challenges. The government must find ways to regulate the food industry that will decrease instances of obesity, without making Americans feel like they are losing their freedom to choose what they want to eat.

A passage from Stephanie Rosenbloom read, “This is just another unnecessary government intrusion into private decision-making.” Now that does make sense, if the government did stay out of our private lives, we would be making America worse. It does seem a bit weird that you can buy a Big Mac from McDonald’s for one dollar, but a good, healthy apple is at least two dollars or more. Sam Kazman made an argument that whether he wanted to go buy and apple or a Big Mac, he has a right to buy both of these without any information. I would rather a calorie label on the Big Mac and the apple to compare the difference. If we could just compare the calories to unhealthy and healthy foods we would have a healthier diet if you were trying to eat right. He also made a point that this is just not a federal issue. While this is agreeable, the government does have a right to label whatever they would

Over 65% of people in the united states are considered obese. It’s not because they want to be, it’s because they don't care what is in what they eat. They like what they are drinking/eating so it doesn’t matter what's in it or what it will do to them, they will not stop if they like what they are consuming. Just because there is a label on an aluminum can a little bigger than before so it's “more visible” then i would like to see how much improvement it makes in these types of diseases. Just because a company puts the label on are people like you and i really going to pay any attention? These warning labels will do absolutely nothing. Every single soda has the warning labels, so does it really matters so much to

Our school does not include a nutritional education program. If we implement this class, we need to make it a required class for all classmen. “Nutrition education programs are found primarily in schools within the lowest and highest rates of childhood obesity,” (Education Sets the Table for Healthy Eating in School). This shows that most schools do not include nutritional classes in their curriculum. Those in need are missing out. We can be a guidance for them at an early age to help them in the future. “Percentage of students who were overweight rose from 18 percent to 31 percent,” (Good Nutrition Deserves the Old College Try). As you can see, students in college became overweight quickly. If we can include an education at our school that teaches them to eat healthily we can lower that number. The importance of this is that with an education it can help you in the future. Including a nutritional education program at our school can help kids make healthy food choices that would stick with them

In recent years, more and more people have become conscious about what they eat. Specifically, becoming aware of what is in what they eat or how much of something is in their food. From a young age children are being taught more thoroughly about what a balanced diet should consist of. It has become common knowledge that our diets should contain all the essential components such as protein, fats, sugars, salts, vitamins, and carbohydrates to name a few. And that on average some components are needed in higher quantities than others, although these amounts needed, vary on the individual. The same goes for the intake of calories you consume per day. In today’s day and age, a nutrition facts label is present on the back of nearly all the food we

Why are not more people worried about obesity in the United States? Obesity is a major issue in today’s society and people seem to be ignoring it. The government should regulate each person’s diet because the U.S. obesity would decrease, American’s health would improve, and people would eat healthier.

Whenever I eat something or go out shopping for groceries, I am often concerned about what I am about to eat has in it. Most people turn the container or packaging around to inform them of what percentage of sugars, carbohydrates or sodium is in what they are about to eat. Then majority of people would believe that since they are unhealthy, it is the labels fault for not being truthful or informative. However, when this comes to my mind, I rest assured knowing that the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, is honest about their food labels. Ever since the Food and Drug Administration was founded in 1906, because of the Food and Drugs act, this organization has put into motion better, healthy lifestyles for individuals. Even though most people

Labeling food is a good thing. Many people in the world have started working out and watching what they eat. Labeling food can help people choose the food that they want and how to balance it. If food was labeled many people could be in shape and not over weight. Many people that keep a good nutrition because of the labels are slim and in a great physical form. Labeling has proven to decrease the percent of people that are over weight. The author of ,"Label the Meals," stated that ever since it was a law to label food that people have been more physical and productive.

In passage two it states that "According to consumer research, label information has had a minimal effect on sales." This goes to show that whether labels are put on menus or not, the consumer is more likely to chose less "healthy" higher calorie foods than more "healthy" low calorie foods. If labels are ineffective then they have no purpose even existing, the best you can do is provide information and let the customer chose. However, stated in passage two, the words "Lite", "Low fat", and "Heart Smart" do attract buyers to places with those kinds of labels. On the other hand, in passage one it states that "Those customers consume an average of 400 calories less than those prior to

Should reading the food labels be necessary before buying and consuming? During this paper, there will be some differences on two authors and their point of view on labeling.The first paragraph explains why Gary Hirshberg agrees that there needs to be labels on food and the importance of doing it. The second paragraph will state why John Davis is against it, and explains labeling is a bad for the people and for the economy.

nowadays, people do not know what they are eating. The majority of most Americans would not be able to pronounce the names of the ingredients listed on the package of the last snack food they consumed. Consumers “ignore certain critical questions about the quality and the cost of what they are sold: How fresh is it? How clean or pure is it, how free of dangerous chemicals? … When the food has been manufactured or “processed” or “precooked,” how has that affected its quality or price or nutritional value?” (Berry, 24) It is of utmost importance that we understand what the food that lines the grocery store shelves is actually

Since, this calorie labeling policy is fairly new and continues to change it is still in the process of evaluation. However, several studies have been conducted to analyze the effect of this policy over several years. In one particular study, participants were randomly assigned a menu without calorie labels, a menu with calorie labels or a menu with calorie labels and a label stating the recommended daily caloric intake for an average adult (Roberto,2010). Food choices and intake were then evaluated during and after the study dinner. According to the results, “participants in both calorie label conditions ordered fewer calories than those in the no calories labels condition (Roberto,2010).” The calorie labeling