Why Is It Violent Video Games Falt That Shootings Happen Around The World

Violence and Video Games A lot of teenager’s love the game’s Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto 5; well at least I know I love them. These games are played on the daily by many teenagers. But some Adults and people who work in the government, thinks game’s as such as those cause some

Whether violent media content leads to real-life violence is always debatable. And in recent years, school shootings have made video games a new focus of public concern and scientific research. In public opinion, video games cause more aggression in comparison to traditional violent media contents because video games have more features of interactivity, "due to the active engagement and participation of players" (Hummer and Wang et al. 137). But more and more reports tell us that video games are not the main cause of school shooting issues; rather it is the negligence of parents, schools, and communities.

Juvenile Violent Crime Index Compared to U.S. Game Software Sales 1990-2008  (“Video Game and Violence: The Myth versus the Reality”) So how is it that it is the fault of video game violence that makes juveniles violent? As much as media coverage will have people think the “wave of violence gripping America’s youth” (Grossman), the truth is violent attacks in America’s schools are “extremely rare events. The odds that a child will die in school through murder or suicide are less than one in one million” (Olson). Increase in news reports about crime just end up raising viewers’ perception of risk, whether or not there is actual danger (Olson).

A huge controversy in today’s society is violent video games and their behavioral effect on the children and adults who play them. Violent video games have been blamed for bullying, school shootings, and even violence towards women. Many have fought that violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence, and that they are teaching the youth that violence is an acceptable conflict-solving strategy. Other sources have stated otherwise. The 2004 Secret Service has stated that only one-eighth of attackers have exhibited interests in video games. Violent Video games do not cause violent behavior or behavior problems because it has not been proven that there is a link between violent video games and behavioral issues, playing video games provide a safe outlet for aggressive and angry feelings and reduces violence in young children, and violent juvenile crime has actually gone down since the violent video game popularity has increased.

This article does a review of other studies that are about the effects of gaming in all varieties, including visuospatial cognition, possible aggression, etc. The review of the studies shows a large amount of studies with publication bias, and in the end have no support for their hypothesis that states videogames cause aggressive behavior. However, some video game play was

This article is a very useful source. Is useful because it answers the question, “Do violent video games cause an increase in aggression.” The question is answered thoroughly by the author because they cited recent studies, examples, and peer reviewed or scholarly sources that all concluded that violent video games cause an increase in aggression. The author is objective because they countered their argument by stating that

Should Video Game Stores Sell to Minors? Parents around the world are blaming video games for their children's violence. Lets talk about that, firstly, you don’t see kids running around the world with guns pretending they're playing “Call of Duty” or anything. Yes there are school shootings once in a while, that doesn’t mean “Oh man, Video games are to blame” the number one cause of shootings is bullying or getting revenge on the bully himself.

Columbine and Sandy Hook, and the tragedy associated to them, shared a common denominator often targeted by the media, violent video games. However, the bias of the media failed to bring attention to other more prominent factors. These video games do not spur aggression as media turns a blind eye

With recent school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, policymakers have placed increased emphasis on violent video games as a probable cause of gun violence. President Donald Trump, for example, is scheduled to meet with representatives from the video game industry to discuss the issue with them.

People link aggressive/violent behavior to violent video games. At that moment people point fingers and media boost the conception up because it's an easy target and its logic reason to them and Republicans make it worse by believe that gaming over use guns in the games and how they focus on violence and how that contributes to mass shooting even though they haven’t find any solid evidence to prove that statement(Grim). So in our democracy do violent video games correlate to violences behavior in real life? There has been many cases involving video games as a factor in the crime. The case of a 87 year old grandmother was killed by her grandson and investigator think it was influenced

Negate Proposition Most of us have certainly pondered on the thought if video games truly create violent citizens, I personally believe that video games do not what so ever. One must distinguish this topic accurately and consider learning to differentiate and not have a biased or radical opinion. There have been many attempts from a number of different people who have tried to give a bad name to video games due to the simulations and realness and say that video games will create a negative environment for anyone who plays them, especially in children. Enthusiasts of video games have spent decades asserting that there is no underlying link between playing violent titles and engaging in the violent real-world behavior. Brand-new data confirms their contentions.

“ , says that “It is not hard to ‘link’ video game playing with violent acts if one wishes to do so, as one video game playing prevalence study indicated that 98.7% of adolescents play video games to some degree”. What Ferguson tries to explain is that for anyone trying to correlate teenagers committing violent crimes and the amount of time playing video games is hardly evidence of anything. Trying to prove that a behavior, such as video gamming, so highly common amongst teenagers is the cause of a rare behavioral incidence, as a school shooting, is highly

Violent video games (VVG) cause’s people to be violent, have a desensitizing effect towards the young children, and can be the blame for mass shootings. The video games are violent and should be banned. Many people aren’t sure how violent video games cause people to be violent, but perhaps they’re sure there can be a connection. People are arguing that the first-person shooting games are truly promoting violence which making it more likely to become. First-person shooter games are when the player experiences the action through the eyes of the hero. Some scientist has said that “in an experiment that some of the violent games do increase people anger and bodily arousal” (Anderson and Bushman). But also some researchers are saying there isn’t enough science to prove that these violent games are causing the children to be violent.

Many outsiders look at video games and judge them for violence and injustice but, as said by the article Is video gaming bad for you? The science for and against, “Last year, psychologists claimed that video game players who favor violent 'shoot-em-up' games are more likely to be aggressive and ferocious when offline” even though this was claimed there has been no real pattern to link aggressiveness and video games.

A major opposition to violence video games leading to aggression is that the research that was done is not a valid research. Henry Jenkins said “...most of those studies are inconclusive and many have been criticized on methodological grounds” (2). The studies are not inconclusive because in the studies that the researchers do they