Why Is Jury Duty Important

Serving on a jury is a civic duty and an American tradition. However, some people view jury duty as a chore or as an event that negatively interrupts their lives. Some independent studies have shown that even jury duty has a devastating effect on married life. Due to this and other extraneous situations, there are only a few people who actually want to serve on a jury. This may lead to efforts by potential jurors to, in some way get out of their duty in a jury. What we know of as the current jury duty system should be changed so citizens are not forced to serve in this capacity and can still be regarded as a responsible civilian. As per the status quo, a trial jury is a constitutional right, a jury of ones peers or equals. However,

A jury is a person who is un-qualified and not paid who is selected at random to participate in the court hearing. To be

In Canada, jurors are poorly paid and most of the times, jurors suffer from personal hardship. In Ontario, A juror gets virtually no payment for the first 10 days of work and $50/day for the next 39 days and $100 a day after that. What's more, the jurors are expected to cough up money for parking. Add to it, the price of gas, the daily trip to the courthouse can be really expensive for a long trial. ("Opinion | EDITORIAL: Jury duty is legalized theft", 2011)

A jury is a certain number of men or women, selected by law, grouped together to decide the verdict of a case. (“What is JURY?”) They play an important role in our system of justice. In the United State a jury hears testimony and evidence of the case to determine if that is enough to move forward. Over the years the jury system has evolved immensely and has improved. Roles have become different, some roles in the jury system have been discontinued and others have been added.

However, with social media and the internet becoming increasingly more widespread and ubiquitous throughout the world, juries are often compromised and biased by media coverage of criminal cases. Juries have their benefits as well as shortcomings, allowing for equality and/or inequality before the law. There are advantages to the jury system, with it being a right enforced by the Australian government and involving ‘ordinary’ people in the democracy. It is a democratic right for the accused person/s to have a trial by their peers.

Juries are one of the most important facets of the democratic process, so preserving them would guarantee the continued existence of democracy in America. Additionally, preserving the jury system would help ensure an adherence to traditional American legal values and principles (Law Teacher, 2016). Preserving the jury system would also ensure that every citizen maintains their right to bring large corporations to justice and to fight for themselves (Faxon Law Group, 2016). Moreover, having a jury leads to a more fair trial, because the opinion of the jury is much less likely to be biased than that of a single judge (Sacks, 1965). One of the most important issues facing this generation is how to preserve the civil jury system for the ones to come.

The American jury system is used most commonly in court, but many question if the jury system should still be included in trials. The jury system should be kept in court trials because it will ensure justice is properly made, allow citizens to be involved in the court system, allow citizens to be heard by the government, and it reviews forgotten evidence shown in court. Some American citizens are beginning to doubt the “trial by jury” aspect of court systems, but the majority still supports this system. A jury is a group of people who decide the fate of the defendant. Juries play a large role in court systems and help decide the punishment of the accused.

In QLD’s legal system the jury plays a big role. Jury consists of a group of twelve adults that are used in criminal trials and are picked randomly from the community. “A jury determines whether an accused person is guilty of a crime” (kleeman, 2013). If the jury fails to reach level of argument (11-1) the judge will have to order a new jury with a new trial.

A jury is a group of people who give a verdict in a legal case based on evidence provided to them in court. The idea of a jury dates back to 1215 the Magna Carta era, where King John of England agreed to mend himself (kings) to laws related to the management of kings and queens, representatives of the church and citizens. In Australia jury duty is a compulsory engagement. According to the Queensland government website a pool of 18-70 people are randomly selected from the electoral role. Additionally, from the 18-70 randomly selected people, 12 are handpicked by the defence and the prosecution to be jurors in the trial. Both the defence and the prosecution must agree on the jurors to eliminate potential bias.

Very few people like to get called in for Jury Duty, as it is mostly seen as an inconvenience thrown into daily lives. While it can be a hassle, a jury is an important part of the judicial system. Being carried over from England with the colonists, it is not a new concept solely created by America, in fact, juries are and were used widely by several countries, it is the one of the many reasons the colonist sought freedom from England. In America, juries are a diverse group of people, commonly twelve individuals, who must decide based on evidence whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. The United States jury is an important part of the judicial system and has an interesting history and use in the courts.

Serve on a jury when called upon – U.S. citizens, serving on a jury is an important service to the community and court system (USCIS, 2014). It also gives the person accused the right to a speedy and fair trial of an impartial jury. The service allows the opportunity to participate in a vital task of achieving fair results in the matters of the court and the accused. Individuals of a jury have different opinions and it allows everyone to understand and see the beliefs and opinions of others in a group.

The word jury comes from the French word juror which means to swear an oath. A jury is a group of citizens chosen to hear evidence and make a decision in court. We have the jury because the United States constitution states that every citizen has the right to jury a case of criminal and civil matters. The word jury comes from the French word juror which means to swear an oath. A jury is a group of citizens chosen to hear evidence and make a decision in court. We have the jury because the United States constitution states that every citizen has the right to jury a case of criminal and civil matters. To be on a jury, you had to be a citizen. You had to be over 30 years of age and had to swear that you would be fair to both sides. You did get

The Bill of Rights, of the United States Constitution, assures that American citizens have a “right to a speedy public trial by jury” and does not stipulate whether or not the jury consists of laymen (nonprofessionals) or professionals (Bill of Rights, 2017). Instead, a jury simply means that a group of men and women sit in court, listen to presented evidence and determine if the court has established its proof beyond a reasonable doubt for criminal cases or the balance of probability for civil cases (Jury, 2017). The decision of the juror’s results in whether or not the defendant committed the offense he or she was charged with. Jury service remains the only governmental function in which the American citizen takes a direct part (Clark, 1966).

When on the jury some of the jurors know what to do. The jurors know what to pay attention to and what does not really matter but others do not. Some of the jurors get distracted by a cute guy or have their mind set on their decision before the case even starts and that can sway the jury and hurt the defendant if they are not guilty and help the defendant if they are guilty. (Document E) Even though some people are mature enough and understand enough about law to make a logical decision others are not making it unfair to others who may be affected by the trial. The jury system is meant to give a fair trial to anyone who has committed a crime, but it is not.

It is totally difference from what I thought. The first thing is that being a lawyer is one of two ways to become a judge. They have served a minimum number of years as a lawyer. Second, there are differences between jury system in America and jury system in my country (Viet Nam). In America, juries are randomly selected. Also, lawyers for both each side can disqualify a certain number of jurors without giving a reason. In addition, jurors will be disqualified if they know somebody involved in the case. The juries must avoid any news coverage of the case. They will hear the case in the courtroom. The jurors do not need to learn so much about law. In contrast, jurors in my country are persons who work at the courts. It means that every court has its jury. These jurors usually studied about law in universities before, and a juror can participate in several cases. One of thing I extremely impress is that the court recorded a video if a parity cannot appear in the court. A video will help jurors a lot in making decision. It was a civil case about car insurance between a professor and an insurance company. However, the professor cannot come to the court, so the court had to record a video to support the trail process. I was really surprised because it has never happened in my