Why Is Lizzie Andrew Borden Innocent

In The Crucible there are many smaller arguments occurring. One of these smaller arguments is trust. This is an argument because consistently John Proctor argues why all of the townspeople trust Abigail and the girls and question everyone except them. John says, “If she is innocent! Why do you never wonder if Parris be innocent, or Abigail? Is the accuser always holy now? Were they born this morning as clean as God’s fingers?” (Miller 77). John says this to Hale when his wife, Elizabeth, is accused of witchcraft. John knows that Elizabeth is innocent but no one will question Abigail, which is relating to trust since all of townspeople fully trust Abigail they don’t believe that she would lie about Elizabeth being a witch.

One reason that Lizzie Borden is innocent is that she deeply cared about her father. Lizzie grieved when her father died. According to source #2 it states, “There was a tremendous outpouring of grief in the letters.” This shows that Lizzie grieved when her father died. She wouldn’t grief if

Have you ever been so angry you thought about killing your parents with an axe? Well many people think Lizzie Borden did this exact thing. Lizzie Borden was accused of murdering her step mother and father with a hatchet on August 4, 1892. While on trial, the jury found her innocent, but many other people think her to be guilty. I think that Lizzie Borden is innocent of the murder of Andrew and Abby Borden because she loved her father, didn’t have a problem with her stepmother, and there was no physical evidence found at the crime scene. Lizzie Borden was found innocent by law, so why should it be questioned?

On August 4th, 1892 in Fall River, Massachusetts one of the most influential crimes in history was committed. Lizzie Borden allegedly killed her father and step mother by hacking them to death with a hatchet. It is confirmed she murdered her step mother Abby first. While Abby was changing the sheets in the upstairs bedroom Lizzie is alleged to have come into the room with Abby, Abby looked up seen her then proceeded to continue what she was doing. Lizzie then took the hatchet out from behind her back and hit Abby once in the back with the hatchet then after Abby fell to the ground, and continued to hit her till she couldn’t hit her anymore. She then moved on to the living room down stairs where her father Andrew Borden was napping on the couch after running some errands in town. According to court records Lizzie came up struck her father repeatedly in the head and chest

First off, Why do you think Lizzie Borden is or is not guilty? The issue of Lizzie Borden is a complex one, but it is vital to discuss because tons of people in the 1800s believed that Lizzie Borden is not guilty. Some people think that she is guilty of a lot of reasons. Everyone from the 1800s tends to believe that Lizzie Borden is an innocent little girl that would never harm anyone in sight, but common sense seems to dedicate that Lizzie Borden is guilty in the murder of her parents, Mr. and Mrs. Borden. I claim that Lizzie Borden is guilty of the murder of her parents.

For the past century, the Murders of Andrew J. Borden and his wife Abby Borden became one of America’s obsessions. From the towns’ people of Fall River Massachusetts to the rest of the country, the Borden murders became the topic of interest. The case shocked the nation as Lizzie Borden- a 32 year old school teacher- was put on trial for the murders of her parents.

What if you lived in a town of trials where, friends turned on friends? I believe Abigail Williams is guilty of witchcraft because, she was seen dancing in the woods conjuring spirits. Abigail also lied in court about Marry Warren’s poppet and, about her being a bird.

Specifically, during the court trial, Lizzie had fainted when she saw her parents skull (Hewitt 3). That’s when the majority started to doubt that Lizzie had the guts to murder her parents. At this point in time, the defense team had argued saying that Lizzie wouldn’t have enough time to clean the scene and herself after the murder (Helena 7). In addition to this, the defense team had said that Lizzie couldn’t have committed the crime and that she was a rather loving person that was very close to her parents (Gavin 2). Moreover, “In the eyes of the law, Lizzie Borden was not responsible for the deaths of Andrew and Abby Borden” (Hewitt 3). This could conclude that with the way Lizzie acts makes it seem as if she was innocent and couldn’t have committed the

Lizzie Borden is guilty no doubt. Who else would do it. The first reason why is because she was outraged with

¨Lizzie Borden took an axe and gave her mother forty whacks after she saw what she had done she gave her father forty one.¨ The issue here is that Lizzie Borden was guilty and justice was not done in court. Lizzie should have been locked up and charged for both murders that she was accused of doing. Lizzie Borden is guilty and should be charged with both murders.

Three days later, on August 9th, Lizzie started to be questioned in the courtroom over police headquarters. During the first four hours of the examination Lizzie gave confusing and contradicting information pertaining to where she was and what she was doing. Two days later, on August 11th, Lizzie was read her rights and arrested by Chief Hillard for the murder of her parents. The following day Lizzie made a plea of not guilty to the charges against her before being transported by rail car to a jail located in Taunton, an area located eight miles from Fall River. August 22nd Lizzie was returned to the Fall River courtroom for her preliminary hearing, after a criminal complaint has been filed by the prosecutor, next is to determine whether there is enough evidence to require a trial. At the end of the hearing, Judge Josiah Blaisdell pronounced Lizzie as ‘probably guilty’ and ordered her to face a grand jury. From November 15th to the 21st Lizzie faced the grand jury to plead not guilty. It wasn’t until December first, that a testimony was made against Lizzie by a friend of the families. Alex Russell appeared before the grand jury to make his statement about the blue dress he saw Lizzie burn. Lizzie responded with the fact that the dress was covered in old paint. The question then is, why was she burning it the day of the murders? The statement from Russell matched with an earlier testimony made by Bridget, she claimed Lizzie was wearing a blue dress the morning of the murders. Since both testimonies matched, it was enough evidence to convince the jury to indict, formally accuse of or charge with a serious crime, Lizzie for the murder of her parents. On June 5th, 1893 Andrew Jennings and George Robinson represented the defendant while Knowlton and Thomas Moody argued the case of the prosecution. Moody opened the case with a two hour long speech while

This is because soldiers found out evidence in her house that she supported the confederacy, but not a part of the kidnapping plot. Also on page 16, the text states, “She agreed, and soon she drove down to Surrattsville by carriage.” She did not supply weapons or ammunition, and the book, Chasing Lincoln’s Killer, then only talks about her arrest and nothing else about her. This shows that she was innocent because she was barely a part of the kidnapping of the president

Some people have thought that there were various people involved with the witchcraft hysteria. Most of these people have had very believable examples to back up their answer as well. In “The Crucible,” there were many of the villagers that were involved in the whole witchcraft hysteria. Majority of them involved were actually innocent the whole time the case was going on. I believe that Abigail is the most responsible for the happening of the witchcraft hysteria because she is a manipulative person

One of the most key suspects was Lizzie because she disliked her stepmother, Lizzie also would receive her father's money. In addition, Lizzie had lots of people pointing the finger at her many people believed she planned it in advance (Katz 9). Also, cops found a blade covered in ash, “A hatchet had been discovered in the basement of the Borden home, but its blade was clean and the handle had been broken off (Maranzani 2).” Lizzie could have broken and cleaned the handle off the hatchet, and changed her dress in 8 to 13 minutes (Katz10). Based on the evidence provided it makes the most since that Lizzie Borden was in fact the murderer.

An innocent man was convicted of a crime he did not commit. Several reasons exist. First: Bennett had a previous arrest record and he seemed to fit the description of the killer. Second: the police were under pressure to solve the crime. And finally "above all, because the public was clamoring for some way to express its indignation (for the death of Mrs. Stuart), found Willie Bennett a plausible target"(Baird and Rosenbaum 97). Cases just like this one lead to innocent men found guilty with the potential of being put on death row.