Why Is Love Without Fidelity

Love is unique in its striking ability to be a driving force in dictating interpersonal relationships. It patterns behavior and orients individuals towards their distinct, unique attractions. According to Velleman, love penetrates deeper than one’s qualities; it extends to one’s rational will, or the essence of a person. To him, though love appears to have particularity, it is also a moral emotion. Kolodny subscribes to the relationship theory, asserting that an ongoing, interpersonal, and historical relationship with a relative is a part of the reason for love. In Kolodny’s view, the existence of the true self is irrelevant, as is the morality of love. Both Velleman and Kolodny disprove the quality theory; however, their perceptions of love and its morality differ. I believe that Kolodny is correct in his view that morality is irrelevant to love and that there must be factual reasons for love. Although it is enticing to believe that one is attracted to the essence of another, the essence is not motivation enough for love. The relationship theory takes into account the motivation needed to love a particular person from a historical, interpersonal, and ongoing perspective.

Love is exclusive between the loved and lover because humans tend to prioritize love above all else in the world as it leads to fulfillment. For the beginning of my paper, I intend to compare two useful arguments from Aristophanes and Socrates that transpired in Plato’s The Symposium as their ideas apply to the exclusivity of love. Additionally, my paper will contain my reflection on love through examining the importance of love to human flourishing, perfect and imperfect loves, what and who love is properly for, the relationship between love and beauty, and the relationship between love and desire in order to further comprehend the encompassing relationship between love and exclusivity.

William Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 116” and Edna St. Vincent Millay’s “Love Is Not All” both attempt to define love, by telling what love is and what it is not. Shakespeare’s sonnet praises love and speaks of love in its most ideal form, while Millay’s poem begins by giving the impression that the speaker feels that love is not all, but during the unfolding of the poem we find the ironic truth that love is all. Shakespeare, on the other hand, depicts love as perfect and necessary from the beginning to the end of his poem. Although these two authors have taken two completely different approaches, both have worked to show the importance of love and to define it. However, Shakespeare is most confident of his definition of love, while Millay seems

“You are always insane when you are in love (Friedlander).” The meaning of true love is the way a person feels about another person and the actions that person takes to prove his or her love. “Love is pleasure and pain, joy and sorrow. It has long been held that what you love can hurt you, in almost equal reciprocity. The more you love, the more you can get hurt. The more you love, the more you stand to lose (Black).” Often a person will give gifts and never express his or her feelings out loud. The purpose of his or her love would feel as if the love was being bought. “Money does not give joy. Material wealth does not give joy. It gives convenience, yet often takes way from love. How many rich people seek so hard and far, yet never find it (Black).” A person wants to be told that he or she is loved. Helena wants Demetrius to love her. Demetrius’ love for Helena is not true love though. It is misleading because the loving affection he has for her is not reality.

There is a certain confounding bias or misconception in relationships as they, with closer analysis, usually lead to the idea that even honest characters act disingenuously towards their partners. But before one delves deep into philosophical thought on such vast topics of love and genuineness, it must first be defined. Genuine is defined from a simpld dictionary search as “truly what something is said to be; authentic” or “sincere” in emotions, while love is defined as a person’s “feel [for] a deep romantic or sexual attachment.” Additionally, from a religious standpoint, “love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not

If love longs to possess the good there are two possibilities, either man can come to possess the good or it can not. Now the good itself, the form of the good stands outside of the realm of human existence, it is not possible for men to see the form of the good. This can be derived from the worst

“There are two tragedies in life. One is to lose your heart's desire. The other is to gain it.” This quote by― George Bernard Shaw, from Man and Superman, is to represent some of the concepts the books Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare plus A Separate Peace by John Knowles share. Throughout both books loyalty changes the course of justice, creating tragic accidents.

In the play `Romeo and Juliet` the writer William Shakespeare uses the theme of love as a main feature to push the story along. Presented are a plethora of variations of love including family love, true love and courtly love. This essay aims to analyse these three types of love chosen.

Being faithful when faithless this is key in any relationship. I have learned this from being a Christian I can not see God and I can't hear him tell me what to do but I have faith he is real and I pray and have faith that he will put what I need in my heart. He uses Daniel as an example of having faith that his plan would fall through even the odds were greater. Daniel didn't put his faith in his plan or in his men that they would pull through. He put his faith in God that he would change the odds and make things work out. Stanley mentioned most people want to know what is around the corner and how it will end but the big key is having faith in the future. That has helped me in many things in my life by not worrying about this moment but knowing the future will always be

According to UCLA psychologists Thomas Bradbury and Benjamin Karney, who co-authored a study together, providing commitment within a marriage ensures that the couple would tackle their problems adequately (Wolpert, “Here is What Real Commitment to Your Marriage Means”). The study showed that more than seventy percent of married couples who had participated in their work remained married, while twenty percent divorced (Wolpert, “Here is What Real Commitment to Your Marriage Means”). When entering a romantic relationship, both individuals agree to commit to one another for as long as their unity lasts. Giving their full commitment within a marriage also establishes a long-lasting love. The poem “To His Coy Mistress” exhibits a great example of this, with its speaker assuring his romantic partner, “… While thy willing soul transpires / At every pore with instant fires / Now let us sport us while we may…” (Marvell, 602). The narrator promises his mistress that he would fully commit to their relationship, and their love would fight through “rough strife / thorough the iron gates of life” (Marvell, 602). Moreover, the speaker in the poem “Oxygen” states to his/her spouse: “… You are breathing / patiently; it is a beautiful sound… / And what does this have to do / with love, except everything?” (Oliver, 610). Despite not explicitly telling the reader, it is very clear that the narrator is willing to commit himself/herself fully into the relationship, and describes their love as an “invisible gift / our purest, sweetest necessity” (Oliver,

To effectively support this argument, it is vital to analyze different aspects of love as discussed by Beauvoir in her account of The Woman in Love. The first basis of this narrative portrays man as a superior being to whom an inferior has to submit. He is a god in his woman’s eyes modeled just a little lower than the angels . While the man occupies his rightful status as a god, the woman is deemed as the worshipper. Both eventually become the other’s prisoner. In this vulnerability, women are ready to submit completely to their husbands whose image they hold in high regard.

Love, among other values, is the foundation of marital fidelity. The undeniable emotional bond that Eloisa and Abelard share proclaims that between two people true love is most important. In spite of the difficulties that stumbled upon their path, Eloisa and Abelard managed to get secretly married. This courageous act of rebellion emphasizes that true love directly corresponds to marital fidelity and devotion. Their total awareness of the fact that there are going to be consequences to their relationship, whether these consequences were caused by the morals of the society or by Eloisa’s family, did not stop them

By doing so, Shakespeare further implies that it is not the physical perfections, or having a voice as lovely as music that make up love, but rather personality and more skin-deep qualities that make up true love. The utilization of excellent diction, and the use of paradox and allegory techniques throughout conveys to the reader the admirable tone the speaker seems to have for his love, and the realistic point Shakespeare tries to prove in that love is not just simply looks, but character and quality of a person that form a truer and deeper bond.

We only call a certain category of those in love, lovers (Symposium 7) and in contrast with what Aristophanes had said about lovers being in search of their other half, Diotima argues that lovers love what is good. After all, the aim of loving beautiful and good things, of course, is to possess them, because the possession of beautiful and good things is wisdom and with wisdom comes happiness and happiness is deep-down what everyone is ultimately in pursuit of.

The modern concept of love owes a great deal to the Humanist tradition of the Renaissance. The humanists focused on perfection and exaltation of this life as opposed to the afterlife. In Tristan and Iseult the seeds of Renaissance love are present in the Middle Ages. To the modern eye, it is a mystery how the period of the Middle Ages produced the seeds of the diametrically opposite Renaissance. Yet it is necessary to understand this transformation if one is to fully comprehend the forces that helped produce the modern consciousness. Courtly Love is a transitional concept that emerged in the Middle Ages. It is transitional because it emerged early and acknowledges God as the creator of love,