Why Is Mr Bauumer Guilty

Mr. Baumer did not cause Slades tragic death. This is because, Slade couldn’t read what the barrel said on it so he assumed it was just plain alcohol. Mr. Baumer found Slade cold and dead laying down on the floor lifeless. Slade just figured it was alcohol and not poison. But, after he took a sip, down he went. Slade killed himself by drinking the poison, Mr. Baumer didn’t have anything to do with the incident. Slade was finally dead.

This paragraph will state reasons to prove Mr. Baumers innocence. It started when Baumer was trying to get Slade to pay his bills. They got into a fight and Slade was the first to swing. Slade went off with his horse across the snowy land, despite the fight that had just took place. If Slade had paid his bills along with being nice to Baumer, he would still be alive. These prove Baumer is innocent.

In Mr. Baumer's defense, he is not guilty of Slade's death. Slade drank wood alcohol and he couldn't read. It is Slade's own fault. Slade should have acknowledged to read so he wouldn't have died. Slade took his own risk at drinking it.Mr Baumer could have gave it to him to poison other things to get rid of them. He also could have gave it to him to do other things. Slade and Mr. Baumer had feuds, Slade always hurt Mr. Baumer. Slade was a bully to everyone and never paid for anything. Slade cherished alcohol and he couldn't read. It led to the event in the book that Slade drank wood alcohol and died from it. Wood alcohol is very poisonous. Slade deserved his punishment.

In the early morning of August 4th, 1892 Andrew and Abby Borden were found murdered and mutilated in there home in Fall River, Massachusetts.

Today we are discussing whether if Steve Harmon should be held guilty or not guilty. I, the defender, says that he is not. We’ve all experienced being accused of doing something we didn’t actually do but Steve’s situation is just more extreme than most of ours. It’s not everyday when we get told a friend is being accused of felony murder. I will be using O’brien’s closing statement along with other quotes to prove to you, that Steve Harmon is not guilty.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Today we have a very serious charge before you. We have Dr Richard Kimball, who is before you on the charges of first-degree murder. However, he is not guilty based on our success to provide reasonable doubt that Kimball planned and deliberately kill his wife or that he was provoked into killing his wife in the heat of passion.

I believe Montresor is guilty. In the text he says “ I must not only punish, but punish without being punished. Someone might have seen them at the fair before Montresor put his mask on and seen him walking out of the fairgrounds with Fortunato. Montresor is trying to intoxicate Fortunato so he wouldn’t find out what montresor’s

On December 22 Alguinaldo Nesbitt, was murdered when Bobo Evans and James King were trying to rob his drugstore. Steve Harmon allegedly went into the drugstore to check for cops. We the jury have decided that Mr. Harmon is in fact not guilty of felony murder Mr. Nesbitt. Many testimonies stated that Steve Harmon didn’t participate in this crime.

In the book, And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie, I was surprised that the judge decided that Anthony Marston was the least guilty. In my opinion, he was the most guilty. Not only was he drinking and driving, but he ran over two kids and felt no remorse whatsoever. If he wasn't as guilty, then he would have at least felt bad about what he did.

Bob Ewell is responsible for a man losing his life, due to his lack of care, intent, and disregard of others, he didn't care for anyone, not even his own daughter. He is to be charged with voluntary manslaughter.

After the arraignment, the trial process begins. Both the prosecutor and the defendant had to produce enough evidence to sway the jury to either call the accused guilty or not guilty. The trial in the movie started off as loosely following actual court proceedings because the defendant had never been part of actual court proceedings and did not know the proper etiquette to follow. This was perceived through the actions that he showed in court and not knowing his rights to the evidence that the prosecutor had at his disposal, in which all should have been given to him in the beginning of the case. Although the trial process in My Cousin Vinny was not as formal as that of real proceedings, the way in which the judge made the lawyers act within

Is it fair that someone is murdered, but the murderers get away pronounced innocent? That is exactly what happened in the case of OJ Simpson and Lizzie Borden. On the night of June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were were found gruesomely slashed to death at the entrance to Nicole’s home. It is believed that OJ was responsible for this murder. This case caused confusion and question to who did this in public reactions. Years before this case, there was a similar case. On August 4, 1892, Andrew Borden and Abbie Borden were found murdered in their home. There were similarities on how the victims were killed in this murder and in the other one. This murder caused the majority of the public reactions to support Lizzie Borden,

First here is one way the author is telling you that Skidmore was guilty. It was well known that Skidmore wore hats that were slightly too big for him, so his eyes were hidden in shadow. The author is showing that wearing a big hat that covers his eyes makes him more suspicious because eyes are very telling of feelings and intentions. It also shows that if he did kill him he didn’t want his brother to look at him and realize what was coming.

Reverend John Hale was a man who had only good intentions. His strong beliefs in witchcraft led him to believe that everyone who was accused of the crime was truly guilty. Hale underwent a huge change that challenged his beliefs, but helped him change in a positive manner. Reverend Hale began as a strong person with overconfidence, consequently, because of the guilt he felt for those wrongly accused people, he changed into a disillusioned, but sympathetic person trying to right his wrongs.

In the story of Maus, guilt is portrayed in many different ways throughout the entirety of the story. We not only see guilt through Vladek as a post survivor of the Holocaust but also through Artie as he learns what happened during the times that his dad suffered through his past. Does the evidence of guilt from the characters in the story of Maus negatively affect the relationship between Artie and Vladek? If so does this contribute to the way they communicate, making it hard for Artie to truly know what happened during the Holocaust? The story of Maus is a book based off a book being written by Artie from the experience that Vladek went through. Sometimes the relationship they have, makes it hard for Artie to tell a story without being too biased and basing it off of emotions towards his father.