Why Is Natapoff Important To Overcrowded Prisons?

The “get tough approach” to crime control has been prevalent since the 1960s. This approach takes the stance to a more firm and no tolerance policy against crime, hence the term “tough” in the actual title. “"Tough" crime control normally denotes more emphasis on police resources, faster apprehension of criminals, quick trials, and more severe sentences for guilty offenders” (Skoler 1971:29). The “get tough approach” emphasizes the need to arrest and punish criminals over rehabilitation and addressing the social factors that underlie criminal behavior (Barkan and Bryjak 2011). Deterrence of other criminals through severe punishments is the primary focus. The “get tough approach” of criminal justice institutions has been under scrutiny due to the outcomes that we will discuss further on. The purpose of this paper is to simply present the pros and cons that have resulted from the “get tough approach” on crime. The paper will try and remain completely unbiased to the “get tough approach” and solely focus on results that have come from said approach. We will begin by discussing the background and history of the “get tough approach” and what led to its development. We will then discuss things such as incarceration rates (US Department of Justice), crime rates (Dilulio 1995) juveniles in prison (Hinton 2015), policies that have been implemented (Shephard 2002), correctional costs, and destabilized urban neighborhoods (Barkan & Bryjak 2011; Black 2007; Mauer 2006) that result

Prominent among them is the reduction of the prison sentences for nonviolent and low-level drug crimes. However, this is not enough. “Even if we released everyone imprisoned for drugs tomorrow, the united states would still have 1.7 million people behind bars.” That massive statistic comes as a great shock to readers, as they only now realize the true urgency of the issue. The authors acknowledge that “half the people in state prisons are there for a violent crime.” However, “not all individuals convicted for a violent crime are alike.” They are convicted for different levels of violence: some are mass murderers or serial killers, while others are “battered spouses who struck back at their abusers.” Mauer and Cole also refer to studies that found that longer sentences are not better deterrents, as most serious offenses were committed under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The authors call for acknowledgement that excessively long sentences are merely a waste of money and totally

Part 1 of the book highlights chapter 1 and 2, which talks about politics and the consequences of incarceration while chapter 2 talks about the politics of being punished within the united states, some sub topics between chapter 1 and 2 include problem ownership, philosophies, historic changes with the corrections policy throughout time and the economic impact of being incarcerated. Chapter 2 talks about the process in which politics can affect the outcome on crime and punishment, throughout the 1960s the criminal justice system has changed a lot especially correctional professionals who have brought issues to crime and its political forefront.

In society, things are not as they seem at times. The criminal justice system was created to help deter crime and to punish those who break the law. Laws are put in place to be fair to all citizens. Your economic situation, gender, race should not become a factor for you to be given “due process”. Years have come and gone and the crime rates increases and decreases with the years. There have been many senseless killings and everyone has their point of view as to the causes. The focal point of this report will be the findings from the readings of, “The rich get richer and the poor get prison by Jeffery Reimer and Paul Livingston”. I will discuss the causes of the rise and fall of the many different types of crimes ; why the rise and fall of crime rates; what contribution has the criminal justice and or police system has contributed whether positive or negative; and lastly discuss which economic group ends up in prison and why.

Few, such as Webb, are courageous enough to describe the United States prison system as “flawed” in its approach for targeting, punishing and releasing individuals identified as criminals. Truthfully, our current prison system unfairly incarcerates people who do not belong in jail and does an inefficient job at protecting its citizens from violent criminals. It is crucial, then, to devise a way in which to tackle the issues of crime such as drug trafficking and nonviolent criminal behavior, while working towards minimizing violent crime and large-scale gang activity in order to fix the current prison system (Webb 1). Currently, the voting public is largely uniformed regarding the criminal justice system. And it is this lack of education

When we think about what happens when a criminal is arrested, we just assume that they will end up in jail, but that is not always the case. Not only are there jail, and prisons, but there are also probation, house arrest, and parole. In the text we learned how the system has many different ways of sentencing a person that was convicted of a crime. It is up to a judge to review what the sentencing investigation reports and decides which one of these punishments is appropriate. We looked at the different levels of incarceration; minimum, medium, maximum and super max. We learn that unlike county jails, there are no space limitations to state and federal prisons.

Criminality rates based on different societies varies between incarceration and sentencing for reasoning of the crime committed. Prison serves incapacitate criminals from committing other crimes as removal from society, and it is useful as an effective approach to crime reduction (Drago, Galbiati, Pietro, 2009). The consequences of a criminal record is much more severe than one might perceive, and it doesn’t discriminate to either gender. The real consideration is the life after imprisonment, and the issues and challenges the individual is faced with. Associated with each economic analysis approach is the discussion on the consequence of a criminal record. Former inmates are faced with barriers that put limitations to their social status when attempting to re-integrate back into society. With recognition and traction of the criminal justice system, criminal background taints the individual for the rest of their life and shouldn’t be a matter of underestimation. The courts keep records of legal proceedings containing the history of the arrests and trials of the criminals, and these records will remain; if they can’t be removed. This paper will emphasize on the certain barriers an individual may face after they are labeled as ex-convicts.

When viewing prison rates geographically, there is a noticeable trend of the Criminal Justice System focusing on localized communities. These local communities in which law enforcement is concentrate are known as “hot spots”. While the concept of “hot spots” in fighting crime is acknowledge, the consequences of localized focused crime fighting is not. It is important to note that people who live in these “hot spots” experience incarceration at a much higher rate, than most other communities around the country. In this sense, mass incarceration is a localized phenomenon that follow determines “hot spots” by key characteristics. “Hot spots” are communities with sever poverty, high unemployment, broken families, and are home to one predominant

As seen throughout the history of the United States, there has always been a degree of exploitation by politicians in regards to crime that is meant to direct public attention and unease. Over the last four and a half decades the U.S. prison population has grown to more than six times it’s former size. Socially speaking, the impact on certain social groups within the U.S. population cannot be overstated (Gottschalk, 2009).

“I, Casey Apao hereby certify that this Critical Thinking Scientific Paper is the result of my sole intellectual personal property.”

Over the past years, the prison population has increased dramatically. Can overcrowding in prison contribute to inmates not receiving the right treatment? Are inmates receiving the proper care while behind bars? Does locking away individuals who struggle with health and medical needs cause people to become even more unhealthy while they are incarcerated then released from prison. Unfortunately, it is clear that there are many health/ medical issues that affects inmates while they are incarcerated.

A person who is incarcerated is being held in confinement in an institution, usually because he is suspected of, or convicted of committing a crime (Edwards). The rates of incarceration are rising every year, which causes many questions concerning the effects that incarceration has on criminals. There’s an argument that imprisonment does not do most criminals any good, and that they simply receive a slap on the hand before returning to society to commit more crimes. They gain the information and contacts of other inmates, which just ensures the law breaker to continue his path. The

As people walk down the gentle streets of their neighborhoods, sometimes they are blind to the fact that others like them, are locked away for years. Crimes involving the distribution of illegal substances, run rampant throughout the streets of the United States. These offences on many levels, are considered non-violent. Yet, these so-called “crimes”, land people in prison for long periods of time and often the sentences are more intense than the crime itself. Has nobody thought about putting an end to their suffering, and giving them the freedom they so rightfully deserve? Nothing major has been done to combat this ever-growing problem. Attempts made by convicts to explain their case are quickly dismissed, as they are often considered mentally

Every civilization in history has had rules, and citizens who break them. To this day governments struggle to figure out the best way to deal with their criminals in ways that help both society and those that commit the crimes. Imprisonment has historically been the popular solution. However, there are many instances in which people are sent to prison that would be better served for community service, rehab, or some other form of punishment. Prison affects more than just the prisoner; the families, friends, employers, and communities of the incarcerated also pay a price. Prison as a punishment has its pros and cons; although it may be necessary for some, it can be harmful for those who would be better suited for alternative means

On the 17th of June 2016, the prison population of the England and wales was 84,405 and since the 1990s it has risen by an overwhelming 92%! But why? Prisoners often pass golden opportunities to escape because they would actually rather be locked up than on the outside. This then gives us the question is the UK justice system too lenient?