Why Is Oklahoma Creating Jobs?

• The awareness of alcohol consumption can be harmful to personal healthiness and society (drunk-driving, violation etc.) may have unfavourable effects on beer companies.

Those who are opposed to this ban contend that it will hurt economic prosperity of their bars/taverns/clubs/restaurents, which are the areas that would be most effected by this ordanence. However, according to a recent study conducted by the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program in New York, this is not the case. Quite the

If young adults under 21 are allowed to drink, then the revenues for businesses would intentionally increase. For businesses, it would be great for the law to lower the drinking age because it would increase their profits of young adults under 21 purchasing alcohol. Researchers found that if the drinking age lowers, industries are likely to make a huge amount of profit (Science Daily). According to Science Daily, more people to consume alcohol will likely increase the amount of money in the industries. In this context, the more the

The legal drinking age in the United States will always be a point of contention. No one can settle upon a drinking age that everyone is in agreement with; should it be 18 or 21? Ages 18 and 21 are the most popular options, yet neither one has 100% of the vote. With the current legal drinking age in America standing at 21, meaning that people under the age of 21 cannot purchase or consume alcoholic food or beverages, there is the question of whether or not to lower it to 18 or 19 years old. This paper will argue that the drinking age should be lowered, and examine its impact on State University.

To begin with lowering the drinking age to eighteen would be good for supervision. For example being able to drink at age eighteen will have the citizens drink legally in bars, restaurants and other licenses establishments ( DrinkingAgeProCon.org#4).In fact all licensed establishments have a time that says only certain amounts of drinks to a person. Future more that will cause the workers at the restaurants or at the public place to be notify how much that one person had to drink. Which that will prevent that one person from not over drinking. Or if the person already drink intoxicant the workers can assistant them the safely route to be getting home, safe and un harm. According to the website (DrinkAgeProCon.org#4) it says “allowing eighteens to twenty year olds to drink alcohol in regulated environments with supervision would decrease unsafe drinking activity". In fact having restaurants or any licensed establishment’s serving alcohol to eighteen years olds would help the economy because the age group went down then" greater amounts of tax revenue should be collected by the government (DrinkingAgeProCon.org#4). So public drinkers will be in save drinking because there will be regulations to be follow. At the same time they would be making money for the government, how can the government

The stakeholder group that will gain most of the benefit from lowering the drinking age to 18 is the alcohol companies. In a sense, the stakeholders between ages 18 and 20 and alcohol companies go hand in hand. Because these young adults are, for the most part, eager to purchase alcohol, the potential skyrocket in sales for that age group would ensure massive profits for alcohol companies. This is made clear considering that underage drinkers in the United States consumed “an estimated 19.7% of the total alcohol consumed”

As Americans, we are always wondering what we can do to save lives. We suspect cancer, disease, suicide, violence, and distracted driving as taking the lives of our fellow Americans. What you may not know, is that we are already saving lives, and we have been since 1984 because of one simple law. The Uniform Drinking Age Act of 1984 moved the minimum legal drinking age from 18 to 21. Lowering the drinking age is a step backward for our safety and our health. This claim is viable because more young people will die if the drinking age is lowered, lowering the drinking age will not cause people to drink more safely, and a lower drinking age negatively affects people later in life.

In 1984, the United States’ federal government passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. Under this act, the federal government gives highway funds to States that forbid people under the age of twenty-one years old from “purchasing or publicly possessing alcoholic beverages”(23 U.S.C. § 158). The incentive created a sense of a standardized minimum drinking age when legally there cannot be a federal minimum drinking age. Even though this Act has been in effect for decades, there are many debates on whether or not the age should be changed. The minimum legal drinking age should stay the same because it prevents a large number of drinking and driving accidents; it reduces overall alcohol consumption; and it has very horrible health effects on youth.

Powerful interest groups like big candy and soda corporations will be important to appease for this act to be passed. Money and strong lobbying has been shown time and time again to control what legislation will be passed. A way to close the gap in the loss

In 1984 the United States Government approved the National Minimum Drinking Age Act that required that “the States prohibit persons under 21 years of age from purchasing or publicly possessing alcoholic beverages as a condition of receiving State highway funds.” Even though this bill was nowhere near the magnitude of the prohibition act that was passed less than a century before it, the act still damaged the relationship between individuals, firms, and the United States government. Although the intentions of the government were to control alcohol consumption among citizens aged 18-21, the passing of this act affected the equilibrium already established by a consumer-producer market, created a market failure and a black market, and introduced excise taxes into the market.

In Canada, the legal drinking age ranges from 18 to 19 years of age. The United States, Canada's neighbouring country has an increased legal drinking age limit of 21. For quite some time, raising Canada's legal age limit has been a debate. Raising the drinking age across the country and more specifically in Ontario would not be an effective decision by the legal system for society today due to the detrimental effects that this change might have on the economy as well as young adults' safety and freedoms. Raising of the legal drinking age limit in Canada is not a good choice because businesses will be affected, at 18 years of age people are considered adults and finally, raising the age limit might contribute to the flourishing temptation for teens to drink illegally.

I am going to address the Oklahoma State Liquor Laws. The law specifically in question is section 534, chapter 3 of Title 37 in the Oklahoma Statues. The issue being that, in the state of Oklahoma, the sale of any alcoholic beverage that is over 3.2 percent alcohol volume by weight has to be sold at room temperature and cannot be sold in grocery stores or convenient stores. By law it can only be sold by state-licensed liquor stores. This means that the general public has to pay a higher mark-up for the alcohol purchased in these privately owned liquor stores and businesses. The law says that such drinks are to be sold only at room temperature. It is also illegal for the sale of higher alcohol content drinks on Sunday’s, on election days, and on holidays. Texas, on the other hand, makes the sales of all alcoholic drinks legal in grocery stores, convenient stores, and liquor stores.

In fact, of all underage drinking, some 90 percent is consumed through binge drinking [as of March 2014]” (Hall). That being said, by making alcohol more readily available it will reduce pregaming and excessive drinking on and off campus. “ The main consequence of this law has been to drive college-age alcohol consumption underground, which has in all likelihood increased that consumption and probably actually increased drunk driving,” says Gordon. Nevertheless, pregaming can lead to heavily intoxicated individuals driving drunk to their final party destination; which could cause more alcohol related traffic fatalities. By lowering the drinking age young adults could safely drink a reasonable amount of alcohol, legally, without the fear of getting in trouble for doing so.

III. A. Lowering B.A.C from 0.08 to 0.05 will solve the Drinking and Driving Problem in the United States.

The 21st Amendment to the United States Constitution gave states the right to control the transport and use of alcoholic beverages within its state bounds in the 1930’s. The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, or TABC, is the state agency responsible for regulating the alcoholic beverage industry in Texas (The Organization). Texas state law grants the right to hold Local Option Elections. Local Option Elections allow localities (cities, counties) the opportunity to vote to choose whether to be dry, moist, or wet. This vote says what type of alcoholic beverages can be sold, and by what means they can be sold (What Are Local Option Elections?).