Why Is Reading Better Than The Book

Many people may agree that the movie was better, but personally, i think the book was better. The book let your imagination go wild, but the movie just held your imagination back by showing you the scene on a screen. Unlike the movie, the book gave a more vivid description of “The Tell Tale Heart” by telling you every single detail. That is why I think the book was more enjoyable to read instead, of watching the movie.

I think the movie is better than the book because it’s more visual, has more action, and has props.

Following on to why the book is more superior than the movie. The persuasion of the fact that the novel was better, is that the story line was a little bit slower, and easier to follow along in the Flipped book. This is easy to realize when watching the movie. They had rushed along a few things, then backtracked. For a representation, some words were repeated two or three times

The book is much better than the movie this will explain in the following paragraphs as to why.

The perception that the novel is usually better than the movie version in this case is true; I preferred reading the novel over watching the movie. The novel

The 3 major differences that were seen are the shattering of the conch, the pilot’s presence, and Ralph’s attitude towards Piggy. Due to these major differences the novel left a greater impact on its readers than the movie on its viewers. Seeing the movie and as well reading the book, personally the book was a better. The book has a very different approach of that showed these 3 major differences to their full extent. Out of the two though, I would choose the book as more pleasant and

The book was an extremely detail and had lots of character evolution, however, they do need a bunch of time to invest in. They take days to read, but movies take up to three hours to watch, moreover they do not have as much character development. Also, not as much detail or all the points that books have.

- This book is a really good book not a very good movie because they have so many differences if they would have not started in the middle of the book then it would have been really good and entertaining but it just doesn't give me the vision in my head of the whole book . A movie to me is where a book comes to life and, but it still was a good movie but could have been

I didn’t pick the book over the movie because I think books are boring. When you are watching the movie you don’t have to use your brain that much. When I’m watching a movie about any type of genre that has a book that goes with it, I usually ask questions to myself (in my head) about

The book is better because it gives more excitement and emotion. The book just explains each of the events in great detail. I don’t know about other people, but for me the more information there is, the more I understand it. And in the movie of “The Outsiders”, it does not really say much about what’s going on. For instance, when Johnny dies, in the movie, Ponyboy goes home but it does not tell how long he had been out. In the book, Pony is walking home from the hospital and a man asked him if he wanted a ride (Hinton 151). Though others might think that the movie is better because it visualizes the events that are happening. But, even though it envisions what the book tells about does not mean that it is one hundred percent better.

Finally, between the book and the movie I really liked the book better even tho I don't like to read i thought it was better.Because the book had more detail than the movie did in my opinion. The movie was more sad because you actually saw them and what they were doing. In the book you would have to imagine it and it wouldn't be as sad. Overall the movie and book were good but very

I think the novel is better than the movie because in the movie they left some parts uncleared. Like for instances, in the novel at the beginning of the story the novel mentions about how a plane was around Jonas neighborhood and later they “released” the pilot for not going to the right direction. Though I believe the movie is not better than the novel but not worst than the novel also I think it’s down the middle in my own opinion. This because when I finished reading a book later I watched the movie as I watched the movie I always tried to remember what I read in the book to connect to the movie. So in other words when I remember a familiar passage from the book and see it in the movie it really fascinates me. So getting back to the point

After reading the novel and watching the movie the novel is better. These are the reasons why. First, Kenny is different in the movie than in book. Second, Byron has a way different personality in the book than in the movie. Last, Grandma sands is just way different in the movie that in the book.

Memory affects the reading of literature because it allows you make connections and will assist in recognize patterns in the novel. Patterns, in turn, can reveal hidden meanings in the text, for instance, if something is mentioned repeatedly through out the novel that is a large clue that it is of extreme importance to completely comprehending the piece of literature. Symbols reveal to you what text can 't and guide you to a more complex and complete understanding of the underlying point the author is trying to make.

Which is better reading the book or watching the movie first? There are many debates whether one should read the book or watch the movie. Reading and watching are similar in some ways. Reading is thrilling because you don’t know what’s going to happen, and it’s the same with watching. Another similarity is, both can help us visualize characters and expand our imagination. The only difference between the two is the educational part. But both have their own benefits and drawbacks. Reading the book first is a proactive way to learn about details, while watching is a entertaining way to learn.