preview

Why Is Shakespeare Truly The True Authorship?

Decent Essays
Open Document

There has been many disputes in the past regarding the roots of Shakespearean writing. Although many believe that William Shakespeare of Stratford was the writer of his own work, others suggest the possibility of another authorship. For the past decades, opposite groups have gathered clues as to who is the true author of the notable plays supposedly written by Shakespeare. The anti-Stratfordians, who do not support Shakespeare’s authorship, have coalesced to believe that a man named Edward de Vere, the seventeenth Earl of Oxford, to be the legitimate writer of Shakespeare’s plays/sonnets. On the other hand, anti-Oxfordians argue that Shakespeare is indeed the author. One of the anti-Stratfordians, Tom Bethell, persuades his audience that Edward …show more content…

It is hard to believe that a man like Shakespeare could have understood all the court insights. A poor Stratford man, without any connections to noblemen, could not have wrote about the French court so detailed in Love’s Labour’s Lost. Also, Oxfordians believe that de Vere wrote earlier plays for court performances. However, noblemen associated with the public was not highly valued during Oxford’s time; hence, de Vere could have used a pseudonym to cover his true identity. Moreover, Oxfordians claim that Shakespeare is not the true author due to his lack of education. As a son of a glove maker, Shakespeare could not have afford to be sent school to receive formal schooling. Bethell indicates that there are no records of Shakespeare’s attendance at grammar school. The fact that Shakespeare had a limited chance to gain education becomes crucial when interpreting his works because his plays are written with accurate grammar and powerful diction. As a result, Oxfordians advocates that Edward de Vere has to be the real author of Shakespeare’s plays because de Vere was able to afford proper education. Evidently, Oxfordians’ justifications to confirm the authorship of Edward de Vere are demonstrated from de Vere and Shakespeare’s …show more content…

Many critics of Hamlet have recognized the resemblance between de Vere and its protagonist. They were Renaissance men of diverse talents; both were scholars, poets, and even athletes. Besides their correspondence, many ironically similar events occurred both in Hamlet and De Vere’s life. To begin with, Edward had made multiple allusions to Hamlet in his own writing. In 1573, he contributed a preface to an English translation of a book consoling advice, Cardanus Comfort, which was also known by scholars as “Hamlet’s book.” In the play, Hamlet’s most trusted friend was Horatio. Edward de Vere’s most trusted relative was Horace Vere, who, in some documents, was called Horatio. In both the play and real life, Hamlet and Edward, on route to England, had been captured by pirates, which both ended in sea battles. These discoveries, that were initially ignored because they were thought to be acts of desperation after the debunk of Francis Bacon as the authorship, eventually was noted by many scholars to be

Get Access