Why Is The Grapes Of Wrath Banned

Once upon a time, in a world not far from here, there are students who are forced to miss their annual train ride to Hogwarts, lock the wardrobe to the magical land of Narnia, and walk through the English countryside themselves instead of upon the back of Black Beauty. Why are these students deprived of those occurrences? They live in America, the land of the free- except when it comes to the books they can read. In fact, many schools across America exercise the practice of banning books. Since 1982, libraries, parents, and schools have attempted to ban 11,300 novels, according to the American Library Association. The essentially innoxious books are challenged for an assortment of reasons, including use of malapropos language, graphic or explicit

According to the American Library Association, the most common group of people, challenging a book being read in schools, was the parents of the students. Parents have a right to be in charge of what is put into the minds of their students, however just because one parent objects does not mean that the whole school should ban the book from the list. A solution for this book would be to enforce parental consent for books to be read in the classroom. If a parent does not want a book to be read in the classroom, then there should be other options for the student to read. The school and teacher should not trespass on a parent’s rights of raising their child. I believe that if a parent has a concern, they should go and discuss the problem with the teacher so that the teacher will be able to defend their reasoning for choosing the book to be read in the classroom.

Red and others said. For that reason it was banned in different schools all over the United States like california porterville high school (1992), New York John Jay High School (2000); In Norwood High School Colorado, after the book was removed from reading lists and to be destroyed, the parents asked to burn it - The book was removed by the superintendent after two parents complained about profanity. He gave all copies of the books to the parents who "tossed them in the trash." The superintendent later apologized after students organized an all day sit-in at the school gym.

Gerald Haslam’s “The Grapes of Wrath: A Literary Journey” from Bakersfield College dissects Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath in varying styles. To say Haslam is completely reasonable due to the fact his review is a college lecture and credible is quite an understatement, but Haslam does provide brilliant points regarding Steinbeck’s work. Haslam states, “ ...The Grapes of Wrath was never intended as a documentary listing of events and personalities. It certainly was intended as, among other things, an expression of outrage.” (Haslam 1) to illustrate Steinbeck could have presented the Dust Bowl as a historical text, but approached it in a different manner. Haslam is justified considering the various times throughout the novel how social suppression

John Steinbeck’s use of the intercalary chapters in The Grapes of Wrath helps weave the reader’s sympathy of the Joad family into a more broad sympathy for the migrant farmers as a whole, in the hopes that the readers would then be compelled to act upon what they have read.

Banning the book from high school curriculum to keep students from profanity is an attempt to accomplish something that is basically impossible. Unfortunately, Profanity is everywhere and all around students almost every day. It’s in music, in movies, on television, and profanity is even said by students themselves. Therefore, students cannot be rescued from profanity. Holden’s cursing is unacceptable for someone so young, however, his swearing seams almost innocent. ”Holden's profanity does not stem from the same motivation that prompts other adolescents to swear—the urge to seem "one of the boys." His profanity is so much ingrained by habit into the fabric of his speech that he is wholly unaware of how rough his language is” (Edward). He tries to express how he feels about the world and feels its best expressed with bad words, he doesn’t do it on purpose. At points in the novel, it seems as if he said them almost on accident. “That's the whole trouble. You can't ever find a place that's nice and peaceful, because there isn't any. You may think there is, but once you get there, when you're not looking, somebody'll sneak up and write "f*ck you" right under your nose” (Salinger 204). The bad word that he uses emphasizes how he feels about something that seems to be written and said everywhere. Even Holden seems to take notice of the profanity

This is because the community comes up with the wrong decision and does not know what they are doing. The teachers and the parents themselves rather than the whole community should control what is read in schools because they know what is best for their kids. In the first paragraph of the article it said that the school board voted against having the book banned and won. This shows that school board and the people within it know what is best for the kids that they teach and that they should control what the kids in their own school read.

John Steinbeck, widely viewed as one of the most finest and powerful American writer, born to a middle-class family in 1902 in the Salinas Valley of California. Steinbeck is a writer who often spoke for the people. The Grapes of Wrath is a great movie, published in 1939, filled with many universal truths and views on human nature and society, especially where class is concerned. In the article, John Steinbeck The Grapes a wrath: A Call to Action says, “Steinbeck’s novel showcased the other side of the coin: the people who remain behind the scenes while the public benefits from the fruits of their labor, literally” (1). Steinbeck was outraged by the socioeconomic system. In particular, he displays the utmost respect for the dignity of the tenant farmer to whom the novel gives voice to. In the early 1930s the Great Depression was not the only tragedy to take place, a massive drought destroyed the agricultural lands of the Great Plains, especially in Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle. Moreover, reasons where excessive wheat cultivation after the first World War, these lands were already suffering from loose topsoil and, without rain, the crops simply were not able to take root. The novel centers on Tom Joad and the Joad family’s experiences during this hardship. However, the Joad family 's life served as the symbol representing all California migrant workers during the period. Moreover, the novel is also a display of conflict between poverty and wealth, as

Both John Steinbeck’s criticism and optimism was written into The Grapes of Wrath, a book that he researched for nearly two years before he finally finished the book. While writing the novel, he said to his friend and literary agent: “I must go over into the interior valleys. There are about five thousand families starving to death over there...The states and counties will give them nothing because they are outsiders. But the crops of any part of this state could not be harvested without these outsiders. I 'm pretty mad about it... Funny how mean and little books become in the face of such tragedies. (Steinbeck)” His opinionated viewpoint on the treatment of the migrant workers is what drove him to write The Grapes of Wrath the way he did. Though Steinbeck’s goal with his stylistic choices was to write a story with allusions that many people would be able to understand in order to deepen the meaning of his novel, he also used The Grapes of Wrath to share his own religious and societal beliefs with his audience.

Since 1982, 11,300 books have been brought up in different school systems throughout the United States to be challenged (Dankowski). When a book is challenged, it enters the “Reconsideration Process” where the book is then closely examined to determine if it is eligible to stay in the school systems (American Library

“We need to make sure we’re all working together to change mindsets, to change attitudes, and to fight against the bad habits that we have as a society” Justin Trudeau, the 23rd and current Canadian Prime Minister in the Liberal Party this quote could have not been better said other than. The Grapes of Wrath a novel written in the year 1939 by John Steinbeck. The novel is about a family from Oklahoma moving to California hoping that they will get a job and their hopes and dreams will come true. After arriving there they realize that they are still at the same spot as before letting the book as an open ending in the barn without any resources checking the readers reality. John Steinbeck persuades the reader with his writing by getting them

One of the worst injustices done in the classroom is the censorship of novels, especially teen novels. Amongst the censored and banned books lay: The Catcher in the Rye, The Scarlet Letter, Huckleberry Finn, Harry Potter, The Diary of Anne Frank, Animal Farm, To Kill a Mockingbird, and The Grapes of Wrath. In high school

The “Grapes of Wrath” a story written by John Steinbeck tells of the woes that surround the great “Dust Bowl” that took place in our country during the 1930s. After already being hit by the Great Depression, the bread basket of our nation sinks even further as they soon delve into an economic disaster. Within this novel, Steinbeck opens a window for readers into the lives of the people who suffered to survive tis catastrophe; while also bringing up many social, economic, and political issues surrounding it in symbolic ways. The book itself is centered around the journey of a singular family, but is representative of the horrifying journey thousands of people dealt with at the time. Amid the narrative story, Steinbeck gives readers a more

Last but certainly not least, the freedom of press contributes to the permission of having such a novel in high schools. No doubt without such a fantastic right in our country this novel would be shunned. This right lets everyone individual to say or write what they please. One cannot stop or change the words that are printed in a novel just because they are not meeting to their own personal standards. If it is not favored they will have no choice but to take a different alternative for example, make a petition to ban the book from desired school system.

NCAC is composed of a total of 56 organizations dedicated to the preservation of free speech and the fight against censorship. Together they are a nationwide organization that combats censorship both on the national and local levels. Recently, in Chesterfield, Virginia the school district was facing criticism from parents who believed some books within a summer reading list were inappropriate. The parents had requested that the books not only be removed from the reading list, but also removed from school libraries. This would effectively create a local ban on the books The books in question, Eleanor & Park, Dope Sick, and Tyrell, delve into topics such as domestic abuse, substance abuse, and poverty. These are all important topics which the teenage readership need to be aware of in their own lives. In reaction NCAC wrote to the school superintendent, Dr. James Lane, with a plea that the books not be banned for the sake of free speech. The next month a school board committee deemed the books appropriate and the ban was avoided.