Why Is The Reign Of Terror Not Justified Dbq

During their time in power, the Committee enforced a mandatory military draft, closed Christian churches, and passed a law that “limited the rights of the accused” (Doc B), all of which contradicted the rights granted in the DoRoMaC and, in doing so, went completely against the revolutionary ideals that inspired the DoRoMaC. Therefore, the Reign of Terror was not justified because while the idea was to keep the revolution alive, in actuality, it contradicted everything the revolution stood

The Reign of Terror was not justified because it abused human rights.‘’Revolutionary Government denied legal counsel to accused enemies which went against human right.‘’In 1793, a revolutionary campaign was launched against the Catholic Church. Sunday worship, christmas, and easter were abolished.’’(Document _A_and C_)This facts proves that they took way people freedom they are not allowed to have any religious holiday. The Revolutionary they have been ended up all religions practice. The Reign of Terror were not justified because they abused the human rights and they did not protect the human rights.

The French Revolution began in 1789 as an attempt, by the revolutionaries, to form a new government that would give the people more liberty, equality and value people’s rights. Between 1793 and 1794 the government used extreme ways to achieve their goals. This period of time, led by Robespierre, was called the reign of Terror because between 20,000-40,000 french people were killed by the government forces. The Reign of Terror was not justified for three reasons:The external and internal threat did not deserve it, they denied natural rights against people who opposed them and the methods of the Terror were too extreme.

In 1793 and 1794, were conditions in France serious enough to require such a violent response by the revolutionary government.The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years, from the execution of Louis XVI in January 1793 to late July 1794.During those eighteen months, more than 20,000 French people were put to death by guillotine.The behavior by the revolutionary French government was not justified because Any society that invents the machine to publicly cut off people’s heads is off base. The action is unjustified because it is barbaric.The reign of terror was not justified because Robespierre’s s Desperate times required desperate measures not justified In a government that says it values liberty, passing a law like the levee en mass is unjust because it requires people to do things they do not want to do wrong in a government that says it values freedom and liberty. The revolutionary government made too many demands on individuals who were right to rebel against the oppressive revolutionary government. speech sounds rational, but he is out of touch. When a government has to “smother” its own citizens in order to eliminate individuals who challenge it, the government is not promoting freedom.To lay the foundations of democracy and the rule of law, rulers need to follow democracy and the rule of law, not the blade of terror. Any society that invents the machine to publicly cut off people’s heads is off base. The action is unjustified because it is barbaric.Nine people

The radical turning point of the revolution, marked by the Reign of Terror, was an atmosphere of mass executions and imposed paranoia, with more than ten thousand “counterrevolutionaries” (vaguely defined, which at the end turned out to be anyone with dissent) sent to death under the Law of Suspects. Robespierre himself states that “Terror is nothing but prompt, severe, inflexible justice; it is therefore an emanation of virtue… The government of the revolution is the despotism of liberty against tyranny”. “Severe and inflexible”, as justified by Robespierre, the revolution needed a push in order to reach its goals. France under the committee's total control sent anyone with dissent to the guillotine because they were considered to be a threat to the new government, which ironically named itself “for the people”. An anonymous eyewitness during the reign commented on the Reign of Terror collection of authentic narratives that “It seemed as if their blind fury was particularly directed against the weakest and most amiable.The loveliest, the youngest, and the most interesting females, were dragged in crowds into this receptacle of misery, whence they were led, by dozens, to inundate the scaffold” (325). The sickening extent of human toll

Chop! Chop! You hear as they behead large amounts of people using a guillotine also nicknamed the “national razor”. This machine was invented by, Dr. Joseph Ignace Guillotin, which consisted of a heavy weighted angled blade that would slide down and behead the person who was sentenced to death. People liked the invention because it was fast, efficient, and painless. This was the beginning of the eighteen month period known as the Reign of Terror. It started when the horrible leader, King Louis the sixteenth was guillotined at the public square on January 21st of 1793. This era was led by Maximilien Robespierre and he believed that the government was there to protect the peaceful citizens. If anyone said anything negative about the way they

Would you have wanted to be told what to do by a king or queen, or never be able to have have a say in anything? Well I believe a country should have freedom and the power should be in the people's hands not the government. The leader of the French monarchy was Louis XVI. The french revolution began in 1789 shortly after the american revolution. The three words that became the french battle cry was Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.

The “Reign of Terror” was a threat to outside countries, used a guillotine to execute, and had the ideas of full “liberty, equality, and fraternity.” This phase was not justified; thousands of people were killed

The period of the French Revolution was from September 5, 1793, to July 27, 1794. Louis XVI was sentence to death due to crime like unfair tax system and having France be bankrupt. In a 10 month period which suspect enemies in the revolution were guillotined even innocents. Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was not justified because they were threatened, methods that aren't that necessary, and no evidence of how they

During the Reign of Terror anyone against the French Revolution was killed by guillotine. Over 40,000 people were killed by orders of Robespierre. The Reign of Terror was justified because, it put fear in people against the revolution, it made the people for the revolution feel safe, and it gave France more power.

Without The Reign of Terror they would not have been able to do any of these things. The next reason the reason that The Reign of Terror was justified is that forces from inside the country were resisting the revolution. The group against the revolution was called the Counterrevolution. This group of people resorted to violence and forced the revolution to also revert to violence. The counterrevolution destroyed innocent people's property and even murdered them(Doc C).

¨If you want peace, you won't get it through violence¨ - John Lennon. It all started on September 5th, 1793 after the committee of Public safety was created to fight “enemies of the revolution”. Others who disagreed countered the revolution, creating a revolt. Because of this the committee of public safety began killing others who disagreed with their government in the form of guillotine. The Reign of Terror was not justified because innocent people died, the revolutionists were hypocritical,and it overall was unnecessary.

As more peoples blood is split to gain the rights not extended to them, the Terror grows becoming more and more gruesome. The French revolution began in late 1789 to obtain the rights that every citizen in born with. The motto of the French was liberty, equality, or death and the price to be paid for the civil liberties was blood. The revolutionary leader Robespierre and journalist Marat explained the more blood the better so that was what raged the people and started the Reign of Terror. Were the values expressed by the French Revolution necessary though? Even though, the French Revolution saw the Terror as a sign to create peace and restore a new France it was not justified because the extremities of the internal and external threats

France was experience a great amount of change in the summer of 1793, when the Jacobins succeeded the moderates in the National Convention. With the radical Jacobins in power, the country was in tumult, and a Reign of Terror ensued due to a law of suspects that legalized local revolutionary committees. Because of this, thousands of people were killed by guillotine or other methods. Throughout the summer of 1793, the radical Jacobins’ control of the Committee of Public Safety instituted the Terror which was advantageous in it’s intended purpose, yet it was disadvantageous because of the enemies it created.

Improvements over time like the characteristic of the angled blade and the lunette—the two-part circular collar that held the victim's head in place, were made continuously. Furthermore, there was a period in time from 1793 to 1794 called the Reign of Terror in which the overthrowing of the monarchy and fear lead to chaos Within all of France. Executions by way of guillotine began to increase killing thousands. Nobility, commoners and politicians could all be executed by any crimes against liberty(New World Encyclopedia). These executions also included spectators in which people came to watch the action of the guillotine as a means of entertainment.