Why Killing Is Wrong

The death penalty has been considered one of the most severe punishments by governments. However, recently, many people have rebelled against the death penalty. The death penalty is an act that is similar to being ruled under fascism instead of democracy. Under the rule of democracy, citizens are responsible for the acts of other fellow citizens, which can be inferred that crime is caused by the lack of responsibility in society. The victim's loved ones suffer due to the victim's death. It is understandable that they would want the murderer dead, but society often does not work that way. People need to think on behalf of the society.

The death penalty is never the right choice. In America last year fifty three people were executed, and at this time in the USA over 3500 people are on death row.

There is a time where killing is a justified action. Times like this our self-defense, war, euthanasia, and assisted suicide. Another great example is in the book, by John Steinbeck, Of Mice and Men. George had to kill Lennie because Lennie’s punishment could have been worse, Lennie is not safe to be around, and George realized Lennie would never get better and the dream would never come true.

Killing another is nowhere near “justifiable”. Imagine this, someone close to you is framed for a murder they didn’t commit. If your state had the death penalty, they could be punished for nothing. There are many other situations when killing another is unacceptable and wrong. Killing someone takes away the meaning of their life. It will hurt those around them and those close to them. We were all put on this Earth for a reason and everyone should be able to achieve the goals they want to in their life. Whether it’s capital punishment, euthanasia,or the case of George and Lennie, killing others is an unjustifiable act.

Are there ever good enough reasons to kill a person? Killing a person is a major debate all around the world. No one should ever be killed no matter what the reasons are. Killing a person should not occur because of anger. Getting jealous over something or someone should not lead them to hurt them. Frustration often makes people do things that they should not, but that should not happen.

Police officers are licensed to shoot, not kill; often when they are put in a dangerous situation where they feel threatened or fear for their

Police officers have been beating and harassing people for a very long time without being punished for it. Why do they shoot to kill? If they feel like they need to shoot, why don’t they shoot to wound? In an article from Huffington post, former chief Troy Church stated, “Officers are trained to shoot to

Sometimes in order to protect the people, they may have to put force on another. Shooting is a common last resort, and many people are affected by the gun. In order for a situation to get terrible enough for the use of guns, there are a variety of different options that the suspect could be doing: wielding a weapon, suicidal, mentally troubled, running when told to halt (Chappell). If one is opposing a large threat to the community or an officer, and that officer knows someone could possibly get killed by that person, the officer has the authority of self-defense

Killing anyone is wrong, whether they’re a criminal or not. When any state goes through with the death penalty, they are

Killing is wrong because it deprives someone of future experiences. Not only what we value now but what we could have come to value. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus of future experiences. He states that it is morally wrong to kill and adult because that would be depriving them of future experiences. So why is it okay to kill a fetus? Abortion would be illegal after 2 weeks and the possibility of twinning is ruled out. Before two weeks there is no unique individual. I fell that he wants to rule out the possibility of twinning because of creating a unique individual and not depriving it of the fetus. Steinbock’s objection to Marquis’s potentially view is that this gives right to sperm and ova since they have the potential of becoming

Therefore, according to Marquis, a new strategy should be adopted to develop the argument o abortion. In this case, the author starts by illustrating why killing an ordinary adult is morally wrong, and tries to apply same reasons to the case of abortion. Therefore, if similar reasons can be applied to the context of abortion, then decision of it being immoral will be made. The wrong aspect in killing relates to depriving the victim life which is inherently valuable. In this case, killing deprives of the victim the very valuable things that he or she could have achieved in future if life was not terminated prematurely (Vaughn, 2012). Among these valuables are aesthetic experiences, relationships, accomplished projects, achievements and goals. Therefore, killing is regarded as wrong because it denies the victim the value of the future. Marquis, therefore, notes that there are various reasons to explain why killing is wrong. Firstly, it accounts for the idea that murder is the worst crime because of the extent of its deprivation. It also matches with the attitude that the terminally ill develop concerning the future death. In addition, the act of killing has no special importance that supports moral reasons to justify abortion. Furthermore, the author reveals that this idea is plausible in the verdict of various ethical activities. For instance, it is used to explain why euthanasia victims are a time allowed to be killed as well as a reason behind infanticide.

To determine whether murder is justifiable you must look at each situation differently and individually. Some people will agree that certain situations are acceptable, and some will say that they were not. For example, in Julius Caesar, when Brutus and the conspirators killed

If I were to ask you if killing someone is justifiable, some will answer with a strong no and others like me might say it depends on what they did. However, that is a job for the police to investigate and figure out. No human being kills another without some sort of

Killing was easier than I thought it could be, and a lot more rewarding. I finally feel as if I've done something important, something that deserves real attention. All my life I've done something important, something that deserves real attention. All my life I've tried done my best, but no one ever truly appreciated my efforts, really saw me for what and what I was.

Capital Punishment was adopted by America when the state of Virginia carried out the colonies’ first execution in 1608 (“History of the Death Penalty”). Since then, usage of the death penalty has been instituted by 36 states, making execution the ultimate form of punishment. Although in theory the death penalty seems like a viable method of punishment, in practice, it has serious flaws that damage the integrity of the state. Capital Punishment has been falsely idolized as a deterrent, applied unfairly for generations, used as a vehicle for revenge, and made people blind to the fact that life in prison without parole is an equally acceptable form of punishment. The death penalty is an