Why Legislatures Fulfil Their Representative Function?

While both houses were intended to have new members regularly with each election, the House of Representatives was especially supposed to change. James Madison wrote, in The Federalist No. 57 (1788), “[Representatives] will be taken from that class of citizens which will...be most likely to aim at an ambitious sacrifice of the many and the aggrandizement of the few.” Whereas Senators were

Our Legislative Branch has two chambers or as some will call it bicameral. The chambers consist of the Senate and the House of Representatives just like the National Legislative Branch. In our Senate we currently have a total of 31

A bicameral legislature is a legislature in which there are two houses where each house has a specific jobs to attend to. There are many reasons as to why a bicameral legislature exist, some of them include; historical, practical, and theoretical. The historical reasons are given to us by British Parliament who insisted on having a two house government dating back to the 1300s. The practical reasons came about through the framers. They embarked upon this decision when settling a conflict between two states. And finally, the theoretical reason possible, and the most important reason it was put to action was to prevent the federal

This worked out to satisfaction of the smaller states and for the larger states they were given a House of Representatives that would consist of a larger body of representatives for each state in proportion to the amount of the people in that state.

Many arguments can be made against each state for the right to send the same amount of representatives. Bigger states would have a voice in the decisions whereas the small states would not. The conflict would

It was John Adams who noted that "men in general, in every society, who are wholly destitute of property, are also little too acquainted with public affairs for a right judgment, and too dependent upon other men to have a will of their own."1 This shared attitude guided the Founding Fathers in their establishment of what has become America's modern day political system. When today's modern day student is asked just what sort of system that was, it seems the answer is always "democracy." In reality, the House of Representatives is the nearest idea in accordance with a system of democracy that this country would ever reach.2 Washington, Adams, and Jefferson were the wealth and success of their time, and coincidentally, it was these same

The disagreement persisted, however, and was not solved until the drafting of the Constitution. The Constitution resolved this problem by instituting a bicameral legislature that consisted of two houses. One house had one Representative, called a Senator, per state, and the other house based representation on state size.

Another subject mentioned under Article 1, section 3, the senate, on the constitution mentions how each state should have two senators chosen by legislatures up to six years, and each of them should have a vote. The reason why there are two senators for each state is because if one senator’s laws or ideas seem unfair or not equal for the people, the other senate can take power. Under Article 1, section 2, House of Representatives, it states how each state shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, it is better to have more representatives in each state that way they’re watching over each other and making sure to accept potential future laws for that individual

The main argument in The Challenge of Congressional Representation is whether or not Congress is truly represented. Richard Fenno chose five members of Congress to follow and he reports their thoughts on Congressional representation throughout this book. The five members Fenno followed all seem to want to help their constituents; however, they have completely different means of obtaining constituent approval. The problem of representation within Congress is mainly brought up by constituents. The issue of representation; however, also concerns the representative.

The states had issues over the representation in the House and representative in the Senate. Specifically, in how many representatives each state should have in the house and in the Senate as well. There were two different plans for the states to choose from. First the Virginia plan which was favored by the larger states in population, because according to the Virginia plan the number of representatives to each state is based on its population. On the other hand, smaller states preferred the New Jersey plan, because according the New Jersey each state would have the same number of representatives in the House and in the Senate regardless of the number of the population of the state.

In the paper, “Federalist, no.55, 372-74” James Madison, states that the issue regarding the amount of members who would be serving in the House of Representatives, created many arguments. Madison presents four arguments that were criticized against the House of Representatives. The Author’s purpose is to prove that there is no formula that can fix the ratio of representation in the House of Representatives. He states that the size of legislatures differs greatly therefore the House does not need to be confined to an exact number of legislatures. Then he furthers his argument by stating that the House of Representatives has an appropriate size where it is big enough to allow free consultation and small enough to avoid confusion among the people.

The Founding Fathers were thinking of ideas for what to include in the new government. They came up with Equal representation and Proportional representation. Small states favored Equal representation because each state who have the same amount of votes. Instead of the larger states getting more votes than the smaller ones. Larger states favored Proportional representation

Big states vs small states came to an agreement that each state shall be given the number of representatives depending on the population of the state as said in document C “Representatives … shall be apportioned ... according to [population]...” Small states like Rhode Island and Delaware were given one representative due to their small population. Other bigger states like Virginia with its vast population has ten representatives. This dissection befitted the bigger states more than the smaller states since they would have more of a say during meetings. Although they may have had more power in the house in the senate all

Government in the UK is a representative body elected for and by the people. The UK uses the parliamentary system as its model of representation; this means the different areas of government which are the legislative, judiciary and executive branches work in and through each other as opposed to the Presidential model which separates the powers. Westminster Parliament is the acting microcosm for the UK society; it is a small group of 365 MPs who are chosen to represent their constituencies. Each MP is given power through trusteeship when voted in, this meaning that they will try to carry out what is best for their constituency. They are also once voted in known as a mandate, the authority granted by a constituency to an MP to act as its

Representation is a core principle that governs American politics. The United States Congress is comprised of two chambers based on representation. The Senate includes two representatives from each state, while the members of the House of Representatives are elected based on the population of a state. These congressmen and congresswomen are voices for the state and area that they represent. Traditionally, the people who are elected to Congress are expected to make decisions on behalf of the people they represent. However, a new norm that poses a threat to traditional representation has bloomed. Interest groups in America attempt to influence policy in order to achieve their goals. There are three criteria that define an interest