Maryann Yanni
Interpersonal Communication
Patrick Humphrey “Why Men Love Bitches”
I picked up the book “Why Men Love Bitches”, by Sherry Argov, because I'm constantly told
I'm too nice to people and I'm sick and tired of being over looked by the opposite sex. I felt as if this
book could give me a wake up call and in a way it did. Argov is a very charismatic writer, that reels
you in to her text. There's certain areas in the book that seem to flash a light bulb above your head, and
then you seem to understand situations you've had in the past, similar to what's been described in the
book.
Sherry Argov tries to really stress that women need to respect themselves and their wants over
the wants and
…show more content…
I was actually enraged a little bit when I read this section. It just teaches
you how to play up a mans ego and then twist it into a way where he does your every wish. My morales
focus on being honest with your partner and not playing games, but according to Argov, that's all
completely wrong. Apparently men are just all the same, self-centered, idiots everywhere and you need
to train and trick them into becoming your perfect little toy. Argov completely stereotyped men in her
book. This makes the book inaccurate to me because not all men are the same. Her methods apply to
the basic male gender, but she doesn't count the different types of men out there. Not all men are
buffoons or idiots that can just be played into being your little slave sex-monkey.
Argovs book was also inconsistent with how it was telling the women to act around men. One
chapter you have to be indifferent, the next you have to be stupid, the next you have to be independent,
and so on. It was like a roller coaster of 'do this' and 'be like that'. The book should have encouraged
women to be strong but to not lose a hold of themselves. Sherry Argov just encourages you to do what
you want and just not care about how you're affecting your significant other. She also stereotypes
women just as much as men in her book. Which also angered me. It was very frustrating because she
would make some really good points, then she would
you in the chest and makes you step back from the book and think for a
Being that all the characters that were empowered were women, it is easy to see what aspects of gender are questioned or challenged in this novel.
There are countless times that women have been shown or portrayed in a negative light, whether it be in books, movies, or anything media related. This can basically be summed up by the word “stereotype” which has been used many times in the past years. Sadly, women have a set of stereotypes that many people believe, that really portrays them in a negative way. Ernest Hemingway portrays a certain set of stereotypes of women as well, through many of his stories including “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber” and “The Cat in the Rain”. Hemingway portrays women as being unfit to face the realities of the real world. He suggests this by showing women as overly emotional, self absorbed, and unable to make competent decisions whether it be under pressure, or just in general.
The book describes how complex societal dictation dominated the lives of women and left no room for growth as a unique individual with a passion other than homemaking. It called upon women to take a stand against these so called norms and “seek new opportunities for themselves” (“Betty Friedan”). It instantly became sensation and “continues to be regarded as one of the most influential nonfiction books of the 20th century” (Michals). It struck a nerve with all women alike, leading to a “feminist explosion” (Kaplan) because of the recognition of themselves in Friedan’s work (Parry) and the familiarity shared between the women created a sense of community. It also brought public awareness to the glamorized domestication of
When reading between the intercalary chapters and the precedence of the next chapter, I was very visibly able to see what was going
The book is organized in a topical manner. Which means that the chapters appear in collections of stories revolving around a specific topic, rather than in a chronological order. Some of these chapters revolve around her education, her siblings, and what happened after her interpreting session in the psychologist’s office. As mentioned before, she stopped interpreting. In fact, she stops doing much of anything as she contemplates her unhappy childhood. But soon after this event, her sister’s wedding is planned, and she is forced to confront her past at the wedding. She enjoys herself, but resents that she still needs to interpret for her parents.
Both novels characterize men as the hard workers, but it is clear the women also have many difficult tasks expected of them.
The novel written by Barbara Kingsolver, Poisonwood Bible, serves to prove that the roles of women in the 1960s regardless of their background were imposed upon than the roles of men. These women did not have equal opportunity to excel throughout the Congo as they were to serve their husbands only. It was considered to be out of bound if a women tried to attain an education, as well as expressing themselves.
Both authors develop different female characters, who are not seen as level with man but as inferior to them.
It is a well-known fact that men rule the world. Obviously this is not just a problem in America but all over the world. Throughout Their Dogs Came With Them the reader can see what kind of a misogynistic society that we live in. The socialization process of young males all over the world have many similarities. The pattern of misogyny and male privilege has been going on for a very long time and the fact that it still exists brings up the question, where did and where do we go wrong? At what point are boys learning this behavior and thinking that is it ok to act and think in this way. Observing these ideas in the novel could potentially affect the reader by changing the way that they treat the women and men in their life. The story may affect
There are many critics and parents who were outraged about the violence that takes place in the book. This quote by Hinton demonstrates the harsh violence, “I ducked and
He states that they have to be careful of how they come across them, because they could be harassed in a hurry, or how they are nervous creatures, that can be easily excited. This makes the readers believe that men are careful the way they come across women to make sure they don’t upset them or cause anger towards them. The psychoanalyst states that if they ever found them, that they would make a strange strangling sound, which is often mistaken for their laughter. Also they might smile, which is a simple reflex and serves the purpose of disarming us (541). Studies have shown that women are more concerned about their body image, less satisfied and more critical about their bodies, and are more preoccupied with appearance and weight than men (Soffer 578). The narrator uses a metaphor; “if only some dim level, of our reputations in our respective fields” (542) to describe that when the women meet them, they will accept them like their reputations have upheld them. In the diction the author uses to describe how the men think of them shows that if when they do meet the women that the women will want to be with them and accept them how they are. In the mountains where men have never coexisted to women, they might feel as they are being intruded.
One of the most interesting aspects of the book is how the narrative itself is thought of as unsuitable for women. The narration takes place on a small sailing boat, waiting for the ebb of the Thames to bring it out to
To begin with, the power in the relationships in the novel lean towards the women. This isn’t inherently bad, but considering a few aspects, such as how Dicken’s depiction of the female characters and that he wrote the novel in the Victorian era, this portrayal of women is misogynistic. For example, Mrs.
The theme of female struggle against male dominancy is presented throughout the novel and the narrator,