Why People Become Exclusivists

This group either deconvert or change faiths due to negative experiences. Their characteristics include: varying levels of resentment, disavowed returning to church, moved on from Christianity, regrets usually center on parents and they are broken out of constraints. The last of the three groups is the exiles. Kinnaman discusses these in chapter four. He uses the example of Ryan. Through this we see exiles are pushed out and pushed away from something familiar, which in this case is the Church. According to Kinnaman, in the modern day we see those who grew up in the church are now physically or emotionally disconnected in some way, but also remain. These mosaics are energized to pursue God-honoring lives. Their profile includes: they are not inclined to being separate from the world, skeptical of institutions but not wholly disengaged. Young exiles sense God moving outside the walls of the church and are not disillusioned with tradition. They are frustrated with slick or shallow expressions of religion. They also express a mix of concern and optimism for their peers. They found faith to not be instructive to their calling or gifts and struggle when other Christians question their motives. Finally, most exiles feel tension between work and their

And so, to conclude, Fordianism is that institution, and in Brave New World, the author Aldous Huxley uses the psudeoreligion Fordianism to emphasize the need for human kind to have a sense of purpose, and how that can be taken advantage of and satirized in today’s religious culture . Which begs the question: How far are we willing to push the boundaries and possibilities of religion for our own gain? When will the general, good hearted populous regain their senses and fight back what was rightfully theirs for the sake of their beliefs and spirituality? Is religion REALLY just a construct to gain control of

being kicked out of western europe for their beliefs, or being afraid that they would be persecuted

the belief that "salvation came only as a free gift from God" and those who

There are a couple of authors that I agree with. I first would like to share why Canagarajah is the author who I mostly agree with before the other one. Her intention to write her statement was to have both evangelicals and non-evangelicals dialogue in the TESOL field. She mentioned that post-positivist scholars are tired of being stereotyped. On the other hand, believers feel rejected because they have pawned their attitudes and values to one way. Canagarajah offered on her statement what other authors did not. On her statement she did not lean to one particular side, Christian or non-Christian. Instead, she politely exposed both sides on the plate. She asked a number of questions to why do Christians hinder and do not attend non-Christian

For a organized religion to function, there is a need for unity, thus no disagreements allowed, an insider who disagrees with the establishment, or finds themselves in opposition to the establishment perhaps by no fault of their own will quickly become an outsider and usually on a whole new level, but a outsider nonetheless. In the Book of John, Chapter 8 in the New Testament Christian Bible there is a story of Jesus of

Dr. Iwuchuko defines inclusivists as a Religious group that opens their hearts to others in a way, suggesting that people by extension are part of them. For someone to open his/her heart to you, shows a loving concern and the willingness to cooperate with you. One can welcome somebody verbally but the heart will not be there. There is this proverb: “where your treasure is, there will your heart be.” This implies that Inclusivists, treasure non-Christians for whom they are and also, respect their religion. The heart is a very important organ; biologically, the heart receives oxygenates blood and send to the entire body organs. The deoxygenated blood is send to the lungs for purification. Non-Christians are welcome by inclusive but for those

Wurmbrand portrays himself as torn for leaving Romania, but believes it is his duty to preach to the free countries in hopes that we will adopt his mindset, “I hate the Communist system but I love the men. I hate the sin but I love the sinner” (Wurmbrand, 52). With his surprisingly kind words towards his torturers, one would think he would show the same love towards fellow Christians in the West who are willing to help his people; however, he comes across in a harsh, judgmental, degrading tone. He plainly states that he suffered more in the decaying Western civilization than he did in a Communist prison (Wurmbrand, 85). I find this hurtful as he continues to degrade our society rather than coming alongside us. While I am rather guilt ridden for feeling this way, his accusations of how Christians of the West are not serious push me to a state of defensiveness. His words cut deep and poke fun at my personal faith, and due to these words, I would have the urge to resist his pleas for help. While I know this would only adhere to his insults, I cannot help but consider how his words effect my self-esteem and outlook on Christ-like

I also saw the comparison and relation between The fear of losing a culture and The Times are A-Changin although I chose the poem Go Down,Moses to compare Rodriguez's essay with. I perceived the subject of change and its effects to be of great importance in these works. I felt that Rodriquez focused on the change of his own people while Dylan focused on the change of the society in which he lived as a whole. The tones seemed to offer a personal feel and can really make the reader see the world from their point of view. Good work and best of luck with your

Some reason is that they are loyal to the laws of the caste or the dharma. The Aryans wanted to maintain control so they did not want them to leave or go to another social group. And the varnas wanted to have good karma and be reincarnated in a higher group so they did not want to leave their group. So that is a few reasons why they want to stay in the social groups. Although the outcasts suffered harsh conditions they stayed hoping to be reincarnated in an upper class or that maybe they were afraid that if they change they might not be accepted in the other group. So they had some harsh punishment if you speak to a lower group one of the punishments is that you get molten lead poured into your ears. So the varnas faced some harsh

Cultural relativism suggests that whatever any culture does is acceptable and we must positively judge other cultures’ practices—it is “right” for them. Who am I to judge differently? Cultural relativism arises out of a concern not to impose our cultural values on other cultures. The problem with believing that all values are

There has also been a decline in spiritual enrichment in churches to its followers which has allowed new religions and new age innovations to come up. Christians convert to these religions trying to look for spiritual enrichment and fulfillment. “Christian knowledge is being challenged with scientific and worldly knowledge. There is no longer the idea of one truth, one correct body of knowledge,” (Bruce, 1996). In a world based on facts, Christians are continually looking for facts of God’s existence and they forget that faith believes in the unseen.

Misguided peoples are outcast by God and left to their immoral habits and their deteriorating health.

When it comes to faith or belief Nash says that inclusivists have a different focus. “Inclusivists believe that an act of faith is necessary for salvation, they insist that this faith need not have Jesus as its direct object” (Nash, 1994, p. 123).

However, there is another side to religion, one that is quite contrary to idea of unification and acceptance. When looking through the scope of history, we can also see religion as an exclusionary tool, often used to differentiate groups of people on an innate level. As many of these idealogies attempt to assert