Why People Should Be Censored

to be censored, even if it’s not explicit, if you personally take offense to a book you can challenge it to be a censored or banned book, but with that you have to have a valid reason on why you want it banned or censored. There are thousands of books that are considered to be explicit and are banned out of libraries in some schools even if they aren't that bad of books,

and they were banned? Books like “The Outsiders” could be banned for censored information about drugs and alcohol. Libraries have been debating this problem for a long time to get a rule on censorship or no censorship. Censoring in libraries is a big problem. People don’t know if certain books should be banned from libraries, and libraries don't know what would be censored and what wouldn't be censored. I don’t think books should be banned from libraries because they can show you what not to do and

Nowadays many people try to convince other people that censoring music on the radio and CDs is not a right thing as censorship can hide a meaning of the song. There are a lot of different factors why many people want their songs to be the way that the songwriter writes them. But these people usually forget that there are many more factors why songs should be censored. On the other hand, people want songs to be сensored because uncensored music can highly affect young children, limit the exposure

many censored books are prevailing on library shelves and remaining in the hands of students. Without a doubt, banning a book entirely deprives people of being able to think differently and learn about new topics. However, censoring books is an exceptional way to allow those who are easily offended to read a written work without raising an eyebrow. A person will still comprehend the idea of a censored text, while not becoming insulted by it. Written texts should not be banned because people should

“For everything that needs to be said there are always these things that never should be” (Witherbee). This statement has rung true for many generations and for many reasons. Censorship helps solve this problem within T.V. shows, art, media, internet, and advertisements. In the world today people are easily offended and some people use information to their advantage. Despite what some people might believe, there are people in America that can use uncensored information to hinder the productivity of

The Catcher in the Rye has no need to be censored as suggested in the thesis; “The Catcher in the Rye should not be censored. It is a novel from which high school students can benefit” because it is. The vulgar language included in the novel helps it to be descriptive and unique. Freedom of press contributes to the permission of having this novel at high schools. The Catcher in the Rye should not be censored for the sake of humanity’s individualism. First of all, it is true that it is a novel

“the less you know the better,” which couldn't be more true. Why bother with information that will cause more stress and unnecessary worry in your life? This is where censorship comes into play. Whether it be about the world or your country, there will always be something you do not know. People automatically assume that it’s a bad thing when certain information is kept away from society. But is it? I mean, censored material is censored for a reason! It’s not a difficult concept to understand. Daily

basis. Why can people use these terms and not have to worry about receiving any punishment or any ridicule? The reason is because of the First Amendment right of free speech. The first amendment gives people the right to basically say anything that comes to mind whether it is something nice or something like a derogatory remark. The first amendment is good and freedom of speech has its advantages like most things, but however, it also has its disadvantages. The disadvantages are that people can

In today’s world, a number of topics that are considered to be mature are being censored. Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, touches upon the topic. The book indicates that censorship is not justifiable and letting people think freely is what makes the world what it is. Censoring subjects that are considered mature is not justifiable. Censorship limits the author and restricts the readers, prepares people to fail in real world situations, and humans have the right to know about any subject comes to

are banned or censored and every year there are hundreds more that get banned or censored. American Psycho is a book published in 1991 by Bret Easton Ellis which is heavily censored. This book cannot even be sold to anyone under 18 and must be wrapped in plastic. This fictional book was written for adults that like black comedy and the thrill of a gruesome and violent book. American Psycho is a book about a murderous rich man that is censored for a few very good reasons but still should be able to be

The internet is a place where people from all over the world can connect with others who have similar interests as well as share information on almost any topic. While the internet has brought us closer together as a global society some people believe that what is on the internet should be censored. While the content of the internet should have to comply with the laws of the country it is being accessed in I do not believe that there should be any further restrictions as to what viewed on the internet

about censored artwork, I think of artworks that show visuals such as violence and nudity. This semester, Levi’s showed his opinion of hitler by making fun of him. This artwork shows the humiliation and evilness of Adolf Hitler. During this semester, our principal, Mr. Barzetti physically took down his painting from the learning commons; leaving it on the ground with both canvases smashed together, risking the painting of being destroyed. I feel that todays community struggles with censored artwork

with hope of one day becoming a journalist or paid blogger. By the time a student journalist enters college they have most likely experienced some type of censorship. I believe that Student journalist should have all the same rights as a paid journalist has and not be censored on what they can and should not say. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution gives everyone the right to freedom of speech. This prohibits congress from restricting the press and from taking away the right each individual

Ban Books (Rough Draft) Censored books in the library is a pretty big deal to either some schools or to the parents, some just don't want anything to do with a book if it covers a certain topic. However, to have censored books taken off the shelves, that will leave a little selection to choose from and to have the same books in the library, kids will lose interest in them, so it's better to keep censored books on the shelves so a student doesn't lose interest in reading. Given there will still be

Censorship Censorship is a very thought-provoking topic. For centuries artists have fought for their right to reveal their freedom of expression through their art. Restriction on art is not a cutting-edge concept. Censorship has been taking place since the 1500s, thus art has been restricted for ages. The suppression of art could be for a number of reasons. Political, moral and religious can all be possible reasons for censorship. Michelangelo was a victim of censorship. He experienced it quite