Why People Switch To E-Cigarettes Research Paper

There are few benefits from vaping versus smoking. Vaping has no bad smell, no bad breath odorless vapor, no cigarette burns or dirty ashtrays, less likely of getting cancer and other smoking-affiliated illnesses, and can help smoker quit smoking. E-cigs’ fluids have a variety of delicious flavors to choose from: cinnamon, cotton candy, vanilla, raspberry, or any flavor you can think of actually. Various studies have proved that vaping is far safer than smoking cigarettes. However, as vaping is new, the long term is unknown. I actually believe on some studies but when I read the article “Nicotine Poisoning in an Infant” changes my belief about vaping. Vaping is safe but with nicotine, is it safe or not? I bet it is not safe because from the article there is a circumstance that almost resulted to death. The label with appealing

Research has been done to understand why E-Cigarette uses are increasingly popular among adolescents and if the prevalence of point-of-sale among E-cigarettes increases this behavior and the one discussed in this paper is ‘Does exposure to cigarette brands increase the likelihood of adolescent e-cigarette use’? This study was done by Best .C, et al. 2016.

E cigarettes are not a good alternative to cigarettes because users are still putting nicotine in their system. Nicotine is an addictive drug that causes many side effects along with addiction. According to the Department of Behavioral Health (https://onlinelearning.hhdev.psu.edu), Nicotine is a stimulant drug and has the addictive ingredient in tobacco smoke. I will cover below the reasons why E cigarettes are not safe to use rather than regular cigarettes.

Many people believe that E-cigarettes ,otherwise known as E-cigs, are a safe alternative to smoking cigarettes, but this is nothing but a misconception. E-cigs are just another way to put nicotine into your body. Not only is nicotine a highly addictive drug but it is also toxic in high doses. Although E- cigarettes have been marketed to smokers to smokers as a way to help them quit, there is no proof that this is true. They are not a healthy alternative to regular cigarettes.

Does vaping offer a safer alternative to smoking cigarettes? We have seen even the most ardent opponents of vaping and e-cigarette products agree to the scientific evidence of it being less hazardous than smoking cigarettes. Certainly it costs less because a cartridge will last much longer than a pack of cigarettes. Mitch Zeller, the Deputy Director of the Center for Tobacco Products of Food and Drug Administration, even said that if they could get everyone smoking cigarettes to start with a vaporizer pen, it would be better for public health.

Some people believe that vaping may lead people into trying actual cigarettes in order to get a stronger effect. This is an especially worrisome possibility when it comes to children. The fact of the matter is that there is no strong evidence to support such a belief. If anything, the exact opposite is true. Most vapers chose to use e-cigarettes because they realized how harmful tobacco smoking was to them and they wanted to find a safe way to quit. In addition, many of these people spread the word of how harmful traditional cigarettes can be, which furthers support for anti-smoking campaigns.

Vaping is a much better alternative to smoking, than smoking analog cigarettes. There are many differences between e-cigarettes and analog cigarettes. Many people are generally confused by this method of smoking, especially non-smokers. They see smoke, something that resembles an analog cigarette and automatically they assume that you are a smoker. Yes, it is true that when you use vapors; smoke is going to come out of it. One of the differences is that, vapor smoke is not harmful like traditional cigarette smoke.

E-cigs are a fantastic way to help people quit smoking, because when switching over the smokers will still be getting the nicotine that they crave without all of the terrible and harmful effects on the body. E-cigs may also trick the mind too, by inhaling the vapor the brain may think it is smoke and be much more satisfied with it than just a nicotine patch. There was study done recently of 657 people with 289 using e-cigs, 295 on nicotine patches, and 73 using placebo e-cigs all trying to quit smoking. After six months, they had the test subjects report back whether or not they were able to quit. The data came back very compelling with 21/289 people quit on e-cigs, 17/295 on nicotine patches quit, and 3/73 were able to quit on placebo e-cigs. They came to a conclusion that e-cigs, with or without nicotine, were moderately effective at helping smokers quit smoking, and with equal to if not better quitting rates than nicotine patches (Bullen et al). It is proven that e-cigarettes/vapes can be a significant and if not the best method to quit

According to SF Gate, discussions regarding tobacco use have hit meeting rooms. The idea is, while e-cigarettes still delivers nicotine to the body, it does however filter out tar, carbon monoxide and other dangerous toxic chemicals found in tobacco cigarettes. And it's because of this why, theoretically, the public is better off with e-cigarettes.

First off cigarettes are so widely used because it causes increased heart rate, constricts blood vessels, and release of dopamine in your brain which causes high alertness. The reason many people get addicted is because you crash quickly and the feeling of alertness fades away. They are so bad is because it forms tar in your body, creates cancer causing effects, blackens teeth, and destroys taste buds. Vaping is bad for you because it contains a base called propylene glycol, which causes irritation to the eyes and respiratory infections.

Although there are claims that e-cigarettes help people to quit smoking, and some people are successful with it, there is no solid evidence. Most of the time when people vape, they still use cigarettes. The case is often that people use their vape in public places that don’t allow smoking, and then smoke at other

Many who use e-cigarettes believe that they are using a healthy alternative to smoking regular cigarettes and they are not dangerous. As e-cigarettes are less than 10 years old, minimal research has been able to be achieved. However I see those who believe this to be under analyzing possible long term effects that are not yet know. Health risks have been found in e-cigarettes, but not enough to classify them as dangerous in the way a regular cigarette is. Although, in the future, these e-cigarettes could be found more harmful than the regular cigarettes, but this is not known as of today. Therefore a e-cigarette user cannot claim they are using a healthier alternative. Just because they

The question should not be if e-cigarettes are bad or not, but if they are better for you than the alternative. Many people believe that since vaporizers have only been around for a little over ten years, people do not know what the long term effects from them will be. Cigarettes have thousands of chemicals in them, with at least seventy of them being carcinogens, while vaporizers do not create big enough quantities of carcinogens to pose a real threat (McDonald). E-cigarettes do have an impact of people’s health, but there is little evidence suggesting that they are not as bad as some individuals make them seem to be.

E-cigarette is believed to greatly reduce on the health effects associated with tobacco smoking. However, e-cigarette has been criticized as a leading cause of smoking among the youth due to its flavor as well as its novel appearance and campaigns. It is also believed to pose some health risks. Despite such drawbacks, e-cigarette has recently gained a lot of popularity and subsequent growth.

The American Lung Association says it's "a myth" that "e-cigarettes are safe" but does not address the relative hazards of smoking and vaping. The ALA also claims it's a "myth" that "e-cigarettes can help smokers quit." Some supporters believe that e-cigarettes could help people quit, just like nicotine gum. Initial research looks promising, but more long term, in-depth studies are needed.