Why Racism Still Occur Today

Ferguson case of 1896 in which the Supreme Court upheld the legality of racial segregation. At the time of the case, segregation between blacks and whites already existed in most schools, restaurants and other public facilities. In the Plessy v. Ferguson case, the Supreme Court that such of a segregation did not violate the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The 14th Amendment provided equal protection of law to all U.S. citizens regardless of the citizens race. The court ruled that the Plessy v. Ferguson case was legal as long as black and whites were equal. After this law came to be, public schools, public transportation and other public facilities were made separate; but they never had made these places equal. Equality represents what the United States stands for. We the people work together in marches, protests to oppose discrimination on the basis of race and gender. The Sacco and Vanzetti case showed the world that the how justice system in the United States really was. Sacco and Vanzetti received an unfair trial and were sentenced to death, not due to the evidence being presented, but due to their political beliefs and ethnic backgrounds. As Americans, we tend to be afraid of what happens and due to these fears we forget about what it truly means to be an American. This is the world we live in and quite some times, things are unfair; it’s the way the world

In 1854, Scott v. Sanford took place. Scott, a slave to the Emerson family, traveled to Minnesota with John Emerson. While there, his owner died and the court declared him free. However, at the Circuit of Appeals, it was ruled Scott was still property of the Emersons'. This decision stood, which declared that slaves are property. This was one infuriating cause of the Civil War.

The Plessy V. Ferguson and Brown V. Board of Education are two cases that changed the way that we live today in a quite dramatic way. The Plessy V. Ferguson was a case that promoted segregation. The majority voted for segregation and the minorities opposed the idea and the key precedent that was established after this case was that the U.S. Supreme Court didn't base their trial off of the constitution and instead based their trial upon the statement 'separate but equal'. The Brown V. Board of Education case was a case that completely opposed the idea of 'separate but equal' because the whole case revolved around the fact that a mother wanted her children to go to a school that was easier to get to however it was a school that was only for white children so the mother decided to take the case to court and the majority voted on letting the African American students attend white schools and the minorities voted otherwise. The key precedent that was established after this case was that segregation in schools violates the 14th amendment and it should not be permitted by the U.S. Supreme Court. These two cases were important for the transformation for the America we have today, and they influenced America's thought process and actions significantly.

It's truly amazing how different daily lives could be with out the American governments judicial system. During the 1846-1950's time period everything was segregated and split by the mere color of your skin. No matter wet here you are African American, Hispanic, White, or any other color you should be treated with the same amount of respect as anyone else.The Supreme Court has made many decisions over the years that have effected everyday lives: "Dred Scott v. Sanford, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. The board of education.

The Plessy v Ferguson case also resulted in the formation of a new set of laws known as the Jim Crow laws. These laws made segregation legal. Everything became segregated, from schools to bathrooms to even their jobs. The Jim Crow laws also developed until there were laws that kept African Americans from voting and running for positions in office. All of the progress and advances that had been made during the Civil War were slowly being lost.

Soon after, the Dred Scott case was introduced into society. The Dred Scott case was a chance to settle once and for all the question of slavery in the territories. Dred Scott was a slave who, after his owner died, sued for his freedom in the Wisconsin Territory, where slavery had been outlawed by the Missouri Compromise. According to the textbook Liberty, Equality, Power: A History of the American People by John M. Murrin, Paul E. Johnson, James M. Mcpherson, Alicea Fahs, Gary Gerstle, Emily S. Rosenberg, and Norman L. Rosenberg, “The Southern Supreme Court justices decided to declare that the Missouri Compromise ban on slavery in the territories was unconstitutional...Chief Justice Taney issued that the Court’s ruling stating that congress lacked the power to keep slavery out of a territory, because slaves were property and the Constitution protects the right of property...Taney also wrote that the circuit court shouldn 't have accepted the Scott case because black men were not citizens of the US and had no standing in its courts.” (John et al., 2012). The Supreme Court seemed bias when they went against the government in the sense that they proved a law unconstitutional simply because a black man questioned if it applied to him. The Supreme Court generally said that Negroes were not citizens, even if they were free, and had no rights. This denied the rights of a man, but after all,

It was a landmark case that is historic till this day. A black man was imprisoned for not leaving a "white" only area. This case helped with the "seperate but equal" law. Although we have this law, not everybody treats other people as equal.

Dred Scott vs. Sandford was a supreme court case that was a slave(Dred) vs. his master(Sandford.)Dred Scott was enslaved by a military doctor who took him from Wisconsin to Illinois.Then Scott sued for his freedom and eventually went to supreme Court.The supreme court ruled that Scott was not a citizen and you can take "property" wherever you go.Also the court ruled the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and popular sovereignty was also unconstitutional.Roger Taney claimed the constitution protected slavery.

A Free African named Dred Scott was accused of being a former slave and was put on trial. The Chief justice, Roger Taney, was extremely biased for the Slave owners because he thought slavery helped America immensely. With his opinion, the verdict was that free states don’t exist and that he is a slave in any state. This verdict forced Dred Scott back into slavery when he was a free man. This event is significant because this court case was during the Mexican American war which fought over the annexation of a slave state and Dred Scott forced back into slavery shows that Slave owners and the Supreme Court justice will stop at nothing to make sure slavery is consistent and successful in America. Abolitionists were frustrated because of all the work been done to abolish slavery has shown to be useless based off of the events that are happening around them. Also, the verdict came out bad for the abolitionists, therefore; there's no telling what Slave owners can do that can influence the government to accustom to their

In Dred Scott v. Sandford, Chief Justice Roger Brooke Tawney and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of John Sanford because of three factors that were derived from the United States Constitution. Most importantly, slaves are not clearly defined within the United States Constitution. Secondly, the Court found that Dred Scott was, in fact, a slave according to the lack of specific placement of African Americans within the Constitution. Lastly, the Court ruled that Scott was property of John Sanford.

Racism is a bad thing because we are all equal.We need to stop and begin with kindness. God created all of us. Racism continue to exist and racism will continue to divide our country. We need pray for all this racism. Every time i think of racism I think of hate. We are divide but we need to come together as one.We should end this hate today right now. The KKK was founded in 1866. They've done marches and rallies over this time period.

Even though it is not as obvious, but racism and discrimination is still an issue in our society and sadly it still exists. The past is never forgotten, and somehow history always repeats itself. That being said, I disagree with the statement. My opinion is that no matter how hard someone tries to think that racism and discrimination is not a problem in our society anymore, is just a myth. There are always issues on this topic that comes up through social media and even on TV every now and then, especially between a person and an authority figure of a difference race. Violent actions would not be happening as often, if racism and discrimination is really the past and people actually have moved on. A trend that I see happening is that some

One of the bigger problems in the World that was occuring more than 50 years ago and still is today, is racism. Racism is when a person or several people assume someone’s standings based on their race, Many times it is even used to make jokes. “Victims” of racism have to live with stereotyping just based on the color of their skin. These people have to deal with people assuming all sorts of things about them, things including their level of education, employment, what they do on their free time, or even their innocence in the court of law. Anyone can racially profile someone, but with this it means that anyone can racially profile you. Racism is not just based on one certain race it spans across many different races. According to civilrights.org

they refer to themselves as "people of color." The fact is that we are all people

We always heard from the news that blacks live matter or Latino lives mater, all lives matter, As I could remember racism go way back when whites people called blacks people "Negros " or when black people couldn't use the same bathroom, Eat at the same restaurant as white, or even use the same waters fountain white peoples use at the park, Although all of it ended in the 1800s but yet racism still exist.