Why Read Shakespher

Some people might say that Shakespeare makes great plays that people enjoy. Finally,Shakespeare is very difficult to understand and it's very hard to comprehend when it's being taught by a teacher. The teachers can teach about more modern writers that we might be able to understand. Shakespeare is 400 years old and i think we should be learning more about writers from the twenty first century. That's why Shakespeare should not be taught in high schools around the

Simply stated, students should study Shakespeare's works in school because of the incredible value within them. In addition to exposing students to a multitude of literary techniques, Shakespeare's plays challenge the student with difficult language and style, express a profound knowledge of human behavior and offer insight into the world around us.William Shakespeare is recognized by much of the world as the greatest of all dramatists. The intricate meanings, extensive vocabulary, and powerful imagery contained within his works demonstrate the phenomenal story telling ability of the English playwright. "Shakespeare's use of poetry within his plays to express the deepest levels of human motivation in individual, social and universal

First and foremost, Mack uses a wide variety of counterclaims to connect with his audience comprised mostly of college students. It’s difficult to convince a group of young adults to read something as old and abstract as Shakespeare, so why not have the group of young adults come to it? Mack refers to an array of different yet everyday people such as a “normal guy” with “bowling buddies” or a student who is looking into something more “professional” (line 59). By doing so, he effectively

Lines 3-5 “the obvious argument to the contrary is that reading Shakespeare is hard work and not particularly rewarding. Counter claims is a good way to help state your side of the story. The way that Mack used his counter claims is ineffective because stating that its hard work to read Shakespeare and not rewarding will convince non reading Shakespeare freshmen that there point is valid turning off their ears. Lines 52-59 “reading Shakespeare is just not me…”. “I’m in a profession school…”, and “I prefer something more scientific…” Once again pointing out that freshmen’s points are valid by stating a counterclaim that is true. Shakes per is not professional and most certainly not

“This phenomenon of people having difficulty Shakespeare is hardly news.(Line 30). It is a problem that the editors of the First Folio addressed in 1623.(Line 33), Mack explains to his audience that even Shakespeare’s editors struggled to understand Shakespeare’s work and it is acceptable for them to struggle at first. Mack follows with, “Struggling with the complexities involved in interpreting Shakespeare is a superb preparation for struggling with the complexities of life. (Line 103) Mack used these lines to inform his audience that reading Shakespeare helps prepare them for the real world. This is important to his audience because they will soon be graduating and going out into the real world on their

First of all that Mack uses to advance his argument is his use of counterclaims. One of the CounterClaims that Michael Mack used to ask his college freshmen was from lines (3-5). The Obvious argument to the contrary is that reading shakespeare is hard-working not particularly Rewarding.

Do you ever wonder why Shakespeare is still taught in high school. In high school, Shakespeare was shoved down our throats and I despised Shakespeare and his works. I thought that they were pointless and was just a way to torture high school students, but the more I think about what Shakespeare is trying to teach through his works. The more I respect and understand the themes and the language of his works. The more that you understand the more that you can relate, the more that you can relate the more that you can reflect on the things that you have learned. In this essay, I will argue that Shakespeare’s works are important to learn . I will support my argument by explaining the universal themes in Shakespeare’s

Mack is showing how reading Shakespeare helps you out in life. Also he says “Struggling with the complexities of interpreting Shakespeare is a superb preparation for struggling with the complexities of life.” (103-105). Mack proves his argument with this saying this is one way that makes it worth the

One of the devices he uses to enhance is argument is analogies. In line 9 he says “ let me try to explain by comparing Shakespeare to music” by comparing Shakespeare to music he is explaining to his college audience using something they would understand. Also, he says in lines 1o6-107 “ Shakespeare offers a world of vicarious experience, a virtual

Since before I can remember, I have always loved books. Over the years, I have read a plethora of books. Those books have varied from tales of knights, princesses, and castles to books about real world situations. Although I have read so many books of so many genres, very few of them have consisted of Shakespeare.

Why read Shakespeare? Is the argument made by Michael Mack, is it good? Or extremely flawed? Let's find out by analyzing his speech and everything he said in it to find out if Shakespeare is really worth reading.

I’ve heard before that, generally, no one reads Shakespeare for fun. The author of the article observed that many students go out of their way to stay away from literature, art, and the thinking of the past, as little or as far off as the past may be. I think that the thought process of those students, while likely frowned upon, is reasonable. The five lines of Shakespeare’s work included under the article’s first paragraph had one word I don’t know the definition of, and I’m sure the meaning of the piece flew over my head altogether. Trying to understand literature of the past can be hard, because you only have a few options of what to do when you run into something you don’t completely understand. Especially in the works of Shakespeare,

Can reading Shakespeare better help you understand reality? In the excerpt of “Why Read Shakespeare?” by Michael Mack; Mack is inspired to tell college students how reading Shakespeare can help them better understand life. Mack constructed an effective argument that in which we live or that struggling with the complexities involved in interpreting Shakespeare is a superb preparation for struggling with the complexities of life through his use of rhetorical questions, and analogies. Mack advances his argument in his use of rhetorical questions. In lines (2-3) Mack asks his students “Why should Shakespeare be one of the interests that you seek to develop at CUA?” He then gives an explanation to this statement in line (3-5) by saying: “The obvious

For high schoolers, Shakespeare is the stuff of nightmares. Although English, his flowery, indirect language seems foreign. His five hundred year old characters and plots seem completely unrelated to today's world, right?

Shakespeare has many unknown things about him and has done more than what people realize and give him credit for. He has theories and ideas going around him that could change the way you think about him entirely.