Why Should Air Freshener Be Banned

Dihydrogen Monoxide is a colorless and odorless chemical compound, also referred by some as Dihydrogen Oxide. No it shouldnt be banned because it's what's keeping us all alive. It also shouldn't be banned because its water people don't get hurt really. It should not be here because its basis is highly reactive hydroxyl which mutates. In conclusion that's why I believe it should not be banned.

The ozone should always stay in tact to protects the earth from UV radiation, which is harmful to humans (skin cancer) and also the earth (global warming). If allowed to build up indoors, VOCs often contribute to lightheadedness, headaches, allergies and more importantly has also scientifically proven harmful to asthma sufferers. As a matter of fact, according to Professor Roy Harrison, professor of environmental health at Birmingham University, there is a body of research on VOCs in the indoor environment which links them with those kinds of symptoms - headaches and not feeling so good (news.bbc.co.uk). After proven to have negative effects on the ozone layer as well as humans, the production of CFCs was shut down and in fact it’s banned in the US. Some scientists were not convinced by the act of banning CFCs in spite of all these evidences. “Given the large economic impact of a ban — it was estimated that industries relying on CFC production generated $8 billion in business and employed 200,000 people in 1974 — several scientists in the field advocated waiting a few years for science to make more progress on the issue before making any policy decisions.” (bio.sunyorange.edu)

Fracking in the U.S. is affecting the environment and can affect us in the future, but it isn’t causing earthquakes. Fracking is used in the U.S. so it could affect us in the future. Fracking has no way that is could cause earthquakes. Fracking should be banned because of the problems it may cause for residents near the sites of fracking and what it could do to ut water supply.

The law against the use of CFC’s in products such as hair spray aerosols and some paints luckily was made in 1994 to make it illegal to sell any product with harmful CFC’s in.

Improved air quality wasn’t a subject of national concern until the mid 1900s. After decades of coal burning, unregulated gas emissions from cars and the excessive burning of fossil fuels, people started noticing bad air quality as a hazard to their lives. Over several decades, after seeing the costly effects air pollution was having on the environment and people’s health, interest groups like the Friends of The Earth club and the influences of Theodore Roosevelt and Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring finally came together to persuade the government to enforce legislation that would reduce air pollution. Because of these efforts, the policies of the Clean Air Act of 1963 and the Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Act of 1965, that aimed to control air pollution and raise air quality standards, helped create the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on December 2, 1970. Since then, the EPA has passed more air quality improvement acts, and amendments to previous acts passed, to increase restrictions on air pollutants, with their main policy concern being the Clean Air Act. Improved air quality acts imposed by the EPA have been successful in cleaning the United States’ air quality by reducing ground-level ozone pollution and reducing emissions, allowing for a decrease in pollution related deaths/illnesses and a better standard of living. The EPA, through regulations and the Clean Air Act, has delivered it’s promise to improve air quality in the United States.

It is something that is highly debated due to the smoggy world that American’s live in. Metric tons of gas and smog are pumped into the atmosphere every day in America, which leads to the debate of the right to clean air. Smog obviously can cause health problems when breathed in for too long. This is a bigger problem in big cities which have factories and lots of cars. As an American we are promised many things when we are born or immigrate over here. We gain a lot of rights living here compared to some others, but is the right to clean air among those? Clean air is a subject to debate, but it isn’t always considered when talking about human rights. Moving into the future this will continue and grow as a problem for our country and world as a whole. Having the right to clean air should not only be considered but passed as a human right that everyone

E-Cigs and Secondhand Vaping may not seem harmless but it is just as dangerous as smoking an actual cigarette because of the nicotine that is in the juice and it also when smoked indoors makes the air quality worse. They are not regulated in the US because they are not considered tobacco but that may change. Other states and cities have already put restrictions on e-cigs. Studies have shown that e-cigs may contribute to heart disease and they deliver their own toxins such as formaldehyde, nitrosamines, and lead. Though the toxicant levels of e-cigs may be “9–450 times lower than in cigarette smoke,” as this study suggests, levels of formaldehyde and metals have been found to be comparable to or higher than those found in conventional cigarettes.

This article is based on the dangers of vapes & e-cigs. In 2015 Harvard University scientists confirmed that “lung destroying” chemicals are found in the liquids used for electronic cigarettes and vaping devices.

Paragraph: Also, air pollutants in the form of particulate matter is harmful to our health. Short-term effects like irritation to the eyes, nose and throat and long-term health effects like lung cancer, heart disease are all possible results. The continual exposure to air pollution can affect the lungs of children and complicate medical conditions in the elderly. Even worse, it can cause the brain damage of growing kids or deaths.

Electronic cigarette vaping has shown to release harmful chemicals and metals into the air via secondhand vapor, which is, in fact, aerosol and not vapor. However, the State of

Why should we ban something if we don’t have enough evidence to ban it? We use High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) in most of our everyday meals or snacks. We shouldn’t let HFCS get banned because of scientists assuming what happens to the human body when HFCS is absorbed. Scientist have a graph that shows when HFCS got used more the obesity scale rose with how much the product got used. This product helps us save money, make energy, and has no artificial/ harmful ingredients.

Air, is one of the most substantial source to mankind and our planet. While it exists, so does everything else along. However, in today’s epidemic, there has been certain factors that have increased in understanding whether the air we breathe today is healthy or not? Is it doing more harm than we thought? In other words, the health risks against air pollution have risen in the past few decades; all from what you may ask? Well, it could be for various factors and evaluations; either environmental or materialistic. Pollution is a major public health crisis in the world. (Friis, 2012). This is one of the conflicts that contribute to various aspects of an individual’s life, whether they may realize it or not. In this paper will include the sources that cause pollution with the effects it cause as well as policies on the regulation of air pollution.

Air is a part of all of our lives. Without clean air, nothing we know of can

We use all kinds of chemicals that are damaging our air. Sprays containing chlorofluorocarbons damaging ozone layer in very top part of out atmosphere. Pesticide and other chemicals use for protecting some plant might protect plants, but they are not helping to our air at all.

The article ‘New Green Solvent Could Help Clean Our Air’ has clearly demonstrated the application and limitation of using chemicals to filter the contaminated air that affects human health.