I walked proudly up to the stage to retrieve my first place trophy. I was on the verge of sprinting to the stage and snatching the trophy and just hug it till it broke, but I remembered to stay calm. In my mind, I was filled with butterflies and thought no one would have the same trophy. So close to the stage only to see that everyone else got the same trophy just for participating. I felt embarrassed for getting my hopes up to high. Although trophies are a great way to make someone feel good, you shouldn't get a trophy just for showing up. Some experts say that giving trophies to everyone might send the wrong message to a child, therefore everyone should not get a trophy just for participating because trophies can lose their meaning once everyone gets one, you shouldn't get a trophy for simply doing what is asked, and kids need to learn how to make mistakes and learn from them beneficially. …show more content…
On page 27 in the article “Should Everyone Get a Trophy?” the author stated “Both Coffin and Anthony point out that trophies can lose their meaning when everyone gets one.” I also have personal experience because I am a competitive dancer and I would not feel like I did a good job. Then I would think that if I didn't work as hard I would still get the same trophy. Then this makes you lazy. Yes, I do get a little upset, but this teaches you to be humble. The last thing is that in life when you get a trophy or a reward that no one else gets you will feel proud. You will get a trophy that will not lose it’s meaning and you would feel good. How the evidence I stated supports my reason and my claim is because, like I said I would not feel proud if I had a trophy and everyone else gets one too. This will happen to your children everybody will get one and the trophy would lose its meaning
Should Everyone Get a Trophy? Most teams have the “Trophies for all” rule, But the question is “Should everyone get a trophy for doing what’s required”? Some experts say giving out trophies to everyone sends out the wrong message even though it encourages kids to keep playing. Although some people feel that trophies lose their meaning if everyone gets one, But other people believe that tropies encourage players to keep playing.
As Abate says, “children today need as much of that as they can get in our society.” Parker says trophy’s and not receiving one yourself can be degrading. In addition to acknowledging their effort, they also receive trophies or certificates, reminding them that they were a part of the
To start, trophies are a thing that was brought into this world for people who win a game. sociologist Hilary Levey Friedman says, "That first participation trophy, it does mean something, especially among the younger kids. The children see them more as symbols and remembrances of an experience," participation trophies are for people who earned it, not for people who didn't do anything on their team.
Participation trophies send a dangerous message. I have many trophies,but i worked hard for these trophies. Everyone on my team deserves my team. For the people who think giving out the same award at the end of the year to all the children; i am sorry to inform you that your hurting the child more than not giving the child the trophy at all. Children need to know the importance of working hard than someone else. In life you do not make the same amount as your boss makes just because you show up on time everyday. Why would the kids who just show up to practice everyday vs the kids the more elite kids get the same reward. Life does not work like that.
Yes it might make kids feel good when they receive a trophy. But the kids that do nothing don't deserve a trophy.
If young kids get a trophy for every year that they play a sport and don’t win, they begin to think they are entitled to get a trophy. “Everything in life should be earned”, says James Harrison of the Pittsburgh Steelers. Kids just need to learn that sometimes you win and sometimes you lose, that is just how the world works. “They don’t let kids pass classes for just showing up”, says Kurt Warner, former NFL star. The fact is that sometimes your best just is not enough. Life will not give you a trophy for just trying (Website #2).
According to Bob, YOUR thoughts, attitudes, values, and beliefs show in your life and your kids learn a lot through what they live with you. A trophy doesn’t have any of that..” A child who has a flair for a sport for example, will win because they can, not because of a mini statue of feign significance. Trophies are expedient because they help encourage young athletes to achieve more. In conjunction Cook recognizes that “ the real issues aren’t magically fixed simply by [scuttling] a trophy from the picture.” This is very candidly spoken because, it’s not about a score, it’s about making children grow and letting the youth call their own shots. Loading kids with hordes of pressure to be the best will only make them think less of themselves, because maybe being the best isn’t what they really want. People need to stop acting like private envoys to their children, and more like parents who truly support
Should every kid get a trophy? Well, I think not every kid should get a trophy. That is because they need to learn you are a winner sometimes and sometimes you are a loser.
The general argument made by Berdan in her work, “Participation Trophies Send A Dangerous Message,” is that participation awards commemorate individuals for everyone being a winner. More specifically, Berdan argues that distributing participation trophies to all participants diminishes the meaning of the first, second, or third place trophy. She writes, “When awards are handed out like candy to every child who participates, they diminish in value.” In this passage, Berdan is suggesting that rewarding children constantly with a trophy decreases the value of the trophy that the actual winners earned. Personally, I agree with Berdan because I agree with the concept that providing children with constant rewards sends a dangerous message later in life. On the other hand, writer Eric Priceman defends his opinion that these continuous awards are a necessary part of the education process for young children and will benefit them to strive for better. More specifically, Priceman argues that there is a difference between an award and a reward; he states that an award is given for achievement while a reward is given for accomplishment. He writes, “Just syntax maybe, but anyone that has ever achieved at the highest level has had to endure multiple levels of accomplishment first.” In this passage, Priceman is suggesting that people who have reached the highest levels of trophies and medals have also been encouraged along the way with things such as participation awards. He describes the action of distributing participation awards similarly to encouraging phrases that motivate an individual to strive for greatness. Despite his argument, I believe Priceman is wrong because rewarding children with a meaningless trophy or certificate provides no benefit for them in their future. More specifically, I
All across America, you see the topic of “Should children be receiving participation trophies” being brought up. The idea that all kids should get some reward for being a part of the game and helping it grow. To some, it seems like an excellent idea, but to others not as much. For example, NFL linebacker James Harrison took his children 's participation trophies and gave them back to their coaches saying "EARN a real trophy." Other parents believe that their children deserve to be praised and want them to feel good for doing something they have worked hard. So which side is correct? Should we give our kids these trophies or not?
Should everyone get a trophy? shouldn't get participation trophies because they need to be earned.the more trophies we give out, the less each one means. Some people believe that trophies should only be given out only to the best. However, participation trophies may encourage kids to keep playing. Participation trophies need to be taken out of the system because they don't boast the kids moral and they should only give trophies to the best.
It is also a good thing to give trophy to kids because you can out a smile on their face and make them feel special. There are many reasons to support those that people and coaches should not just give trophies to kids
Coffin is stating that trophies don’t motivate players to get better, but the players are doing well how they are now. The kids think that they don’t have improved, but instead have to play the best they can at a game. This doesn't motivate players to get better as well and be successful in the sport or what they are getting the trophy for. This is important because watching kids play with no skill will be boring to watch and will be a waste of money and time
John Steinbeck was born on February 27, 1902 in Salinas, California. He was the third child of Olive Hamilton and John Ernst Steinbeck. He had two older sisters, and one younger sister. From his birth until he went to Stanford University in 1919, Steinbeck enjoyed his childhood and his teen years in Salinas. His family experienced some setbacks when he was a teenager. His father lost his job as manager of Sperry flour then he opened a feed and grain store that failed. Only when Steinbeck was in college did the family’s money stabilize and John Steinbeck’s father became Monterey county treasurer. After leaving Stanford in 1925, he occasionally worked for next three years at a lodge in the High Sierra near Lake Tahoe as a caretaker and handyman.
Participation trophies are changing kids ideas of winning around the globe in many ways. First off, it gives children the wrong impression on working or putting an effort towards something. Trophies are something you should have to earn. Life doesn’t give you a participation medal, you have to earn it (Website #2). Kids just need to learn that