Why Should People Be Allowed To Vote?

Like any good argument, there are always two sides. This one is not an exception. There are some benefits. For one, it would give everyone an equal voice. Of course, one person is only one vote; but when it comes to non-partisan voters, they have almost no voice compared to their partisan counterparts. Two party elections have been the primary setting for every election in the United States. It has always been one side versus another. The independents and third-parties have been lacking representation in almost every election. If voting was mandatory, the number of independent voters would skyrocket. The result of such high numbers would be the fairest election to date. If everyone voiced their opinions, instead of sidelining, we could achieve accurate numbers for our elections. Some people don't vote because they believe one vote is worth nothing. If people were required, the phrase "Strength in numbers" would really show its accuracy. If voting was required in the 2016 election, Bernie Sanders may have taken the presidency. Just because someone lost, doesn't mean they lost in numbers. It means they lost in voting numbers.

If you don't voice your opinion by voting, you shouldn't have the right to voice your complaints when things don't go the way you want them to.

I believe that American citizens should be required to vote in national elections. Jury duty is mandatory so why isn't voting? (“Telling Americans to vote, or else”1).

Selecting the right candidate is hard and need more people to participate and to achieve that all citizens need to voting and select the future leaders to benefit themselves and their country. By adding the voting as mandatory will ensure more responses and also keep the country on the right path. For example, In the United States, the recent studies conducted by various governments show that twenty percent only of the population gave their voting voice in the

There is value in having and exercising the right to vote. Americans today have developed a mindset that their vote does not make a difference, and that voicing out their opinions is a waste of time. This is not the case, however, as the rights that Americans are neglecting are the same rights that our ancestors have fought for during the enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The laws that affect the average individuals, the influences of various platformed parties, and the importance of voting in society exemplifies why Americans should value their right to vote.

Proponents say the voting method ensures that whoever is elected has the support of a majority of voters. They say this helps increase civility because candidates need to appeal to a spectrum broader than just their base in order to win over their opponents’ supporters on subsequent ballots. And theoretically it eliminates the possibility of a “spoiler” candidate winning.

Voting should be an easy access to everyone; it is the cornerstone of representational democracy. The very thing that makes America a place where peoples voices are heard or at least make them feel that

But when voting booths are limited and people are forced to wait in long lines they tend to leave. To some that vote was faught for and needs to be preserved but for others they simply dont have the time of the day to leave work so if there is a line when that blue collar worker gets to his voting place he may not be able to afford to give up the appicable time to wait to vote becuase he has things at home or an even he has to be at. This a real problem the system faces today, in Arizonas 2016 primary certain poll places ran out of votes. Ultimately denying voters the right to vote. With new systems like internet voting being put in place in specific state primaries to determine if it woud be a possibility, but in the end this is just providing temporary fixes to a long term problem. Certain states in the Electoral College system get away with extending voting hours to appeal to blue collar demographics and raise voter turnout. This can be deemed to be not fair to other less important states that suffer the same issues the ones in swing states that have voting hours

If there were less elections open to the public, maybe voters would take their rights more seriously. This is not to hinder our democracy, but rather develop it. By leaving the decisions to more house and senate members, this will still keep intact representative government and democracy in America, but also help the voter turnout to increase. There are so many elections going on within the voter's own state that they simply take the right to vote as a common thing instead of a luxury. In many countries voting is required to obtain a driver's license thus making it more of a priority for citizens to vote. America should consider require voting by all eligible citizens -not registered. Registration is a lengthy process which should ultimately not be required which would open the polls up to anyone of the age eighteen, not only to those registered. Subsequently, many people do not vote because of the lack of availability as most elections are held on work days. Therefore, making voting easier by having it held on weekends would be beneficial for working

Voting is a part of the consent of the governed, letting people vote for the representatives they desire to have in the office. Requiring someone to have a say by voting, would hurt the outcome and national voting average. Having everyone involved won't give out 100% honest voting. For instance, suppose 40% of the votes are those who really want that candidate running for office. The other 60% are merely voting for anyone. That will affect the poll's turnout by a long shot and the other 40% won't have a fair say in the decision process.

Firstly, both sides of the spectrum which are upon those who agree and disagree both have compelling cases in this question. Such as citizen number two describes that “ if we force everyone to vote, those who don’t vote or care about the process of voting will not respect the process. Thus, making elections chaotic and improper “. On the other hand the opposite side of the spectrum where citizen number one is located,

Many people feel that voting is important and most people feel like it’s only right to do your part in choosing your leader. In the US we are not forced to vote however some feel we should be. Now in the 1820s in america the only group of people that can vote was white men who owned land. As times changed other groups got the chance to vote and participate in choosing our leader which is in fact a big deal. In my personal opinion I don’t think we should be required to vote because no matter what it is us as U.S. citizen should always have a choice.

In 2000 Riverside County California decided to spend 14 million dollars to make their voting system all electronic. This decision was made on the basis that in 1998 more than one million dollars was spent on paper ballots (in Riverside), but when only half of the county voted the extras had to be trashed. For local elections their new electronic system fetched a 99% approval rating from voters (Wired.com article). The only foreseeable downside to this technology is the start up price and with internet voting not likely due to security issues, this maybe the best solution.

The primary advantage of the mail ballot is that it requires little time and effort on the part of the voter. We think that also is a primary shortcoming of this process.

Many groups opposed to electronic voting want a paper print out like a receipt that could be used for recounts. The request does not seem absurd but returning to this paper system introduces some new complications, among them: What happens on Election Day if the printers fail, as printers often do? How do poll workers and voters prevent tampering with the paper ballots? These questions do not have strong enough answers to make companies add printers to the machines. The main reason there is a demand for the electronic voting system is because of the rumors of fraud with the older paper ballots.