Why Should The Burqa Not Be Banned Case Study

There has been debates about whether the Islamic face veil should be banned in countries. The arguments that governments of countries that have banned the Muslim face veil (France, Syria, Netherlands, Spain, and Belgium) argue that the full-face veil is oppressive, degrading towards women, and goes against values of each country. However, many Muslim women believe otherwise and strongly disagree with the banning of the veil. I strongly believe that the Islamic face veil should not be banned because it is a complete violation of religious and expressive freedom and forces them to conform to an alternative culture.

Since the incident of 9/11 occurred, many people have debated over the Muslim faith and its practices. Muslim extremist groups such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS have affected the name of Islam causing majority of Muslims to be blamed. Recently, a tragic event that occurred in Paris killing over a hundred people left the people of France shaken with fear and anger. These events have lead to an increasing amount of hate and tension towards Muslims all over the world from protests at mosques, where Muslims go to pray, and anti-Muslim rally’s. Islamophobia is a massive issue that has steered European counties like France to enforce laws that ban religious garments that Muslims wear such as the niqab and burqa. Some people perceive these garments to be

The anticipated law, whose purpose is to ban the use of the burqa and veil, finally took place in France. The ban started within school, and expanded into a restriction within the entire country. France drew international attention, questions, and opinions on the justification of this new law. Even though France’s main response to their justification of the ban is to preserve the French culture, the law also positively addresses other problems such as: religious freedom, public safety, and women’s rights.

Muslim women living in North America and Europe often face scrutiny over their choice to wear the veil, even though many Western people do not fully understand the practice.

The burqa should be banned because it can cover up some people’s abuse incidents. Domestic violence has been reported from eighty-five to ninety percent for women that do not wear their burqa out in public. Most of the women who wear their burqa out in public are forced to by their husbands. Additionally, research indicated that wear of the burqa can lead skin problems, hearing loss, headaches, and other health issues to the women who wear them. The burqa has also been linked to depression, claustrophobia, and anxiety.

The banning of the burqa has become an issue in many places, including France. The French Parliament has decided it is time to ban the burqa in public. They believe is a sign of the subjugation and submission of women to males. Some believe it is used to cover up abuse and they also believe it is unfair to the public that citizens cannot see the women’s faces. However it is unfair for these women to be banned from wearing what they choose as just everyone else does.The banning of the burqa should not be allowed because it is discriminatory towards Muslim women and violates their freedom of religion and their freedom to express themselves.

Multiculturalism has always been perceived as one of the integral components of Canadian Culture . Under the Canadian Multiculturalism Act, Canadian citizens are free to exercise their religious and cultural practices . However, niqab ban takes effect in some public aspects of Canada . Supporters of the ban believes that wearing niqab is not a part of the Canadian Culture and should be banned in order to free Muslim Women from oppression . Niqab ban, however, infringes on the religious and cultural freedom instilled in the Canadian Multiculturalism Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom and is unlawful . A careful examination on Canadian culture and laws, the origins and arguments of the ban, and its implications is needed in order to further understand the issue.

Under the PROTECT-US Act of 2017 section two prohibits the wearing of a burqa, except in a private residence. This section violates the 1st amendment, under the 1st amendment, it clarifies freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. By prohibiting women the right to wear a burqa it denotes Although section two violates the first amendment, the Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion. As long as the practice

What is oppression? By definition, it is an unjust exercise of authority by the government, limiting one’s liberty to do what one desires. The niqab is a cultural practice that predates Islam and not a religious obligation. Ironically though as it may seem, the niqab is not a sign of oppression. The Canadian ministry of immigration mentioned the hijab to be a ‘misrepresentation of the Canadians’, however the then prime minister, Stephen Harper mentions it to be a niqab- most probably to strong arm his case. A niqab and a hijab are two different items of covering oneself. The primary covers the entire body as well as the face only allowing for the eyes to be seen, whereas the latter is a medium to cover the head and face except the eyes. Many Muslim women find the two an appropriate way to mark and create their identity.

Wearing the burqa can represent threatening Islamic beliefs. But not only can the burqa represent dangerous beliefs but it also poses a threat just in the appearance of the outfit alone. The only visible feature is the woman's eyes. When a woman is wearing the burqa bystanders and authority members can not see her face thus her identity.

A nun can be covered from head to toe in order to devote herself to god. But when a Muslim woman does the same she is being oppressed. It may be argued that wearing a burqa benefits only a few and brings more harm than good to society. The real question is who does it harm? That should be the basis for banning this piece of clothing, not one based on fear or an arguably feeble argument that the women do not have a choice. To say that a ban on a specific item like this is undemocratic is an understatement. Following the French senate’s unanimous vote in favour of banning the burqa in late 2010, many European and western countries including Belgium and Spain have made the decision to take the

The niqab is a veil that Muslim women wear that covers their face, except the eyes, to show as a sign of modesty. There is some controversial quarrel that these women are not allowed to have their covering on during the oath of citizenship at Canadian ceremonies. The beliefs on this ban is growing as people now think that the niqab should be restricted while in the position of public service. The articles Ten reasons to ban the niqab - in the public service by Barbara Kay and Niqab ban for public servants would be considered, says Stephen Harper by Tonda MacCharles, highlight notorious dispute on the issue suppressing if this subject should be carried out or not.

When I was introduced to the topic of France’s ban on the veil, I disagreed with the law. I took a position based on my customs as an American citizen, which differs completely from those of France. International critics began to argue that France is violating what people call “Freedom of Religion,” which I agreed with at first. As a foreigner from America, I am accustomed to the American government’s definition of freedom of religion. Protected by the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise.” (Religious Freedom). You can express your religion in public, during church, mass, or religious meetings. So the presence of religious items such as the burqa's and veil do not disturb the people or government.

Here in the United States, some individuals think that by wearing a hijab you are you enforcing the belief that Muslim women are being forced to wear one despite the reason that some of these women wear it’s a sign of freedom. Therefore, it appears that to some women, the veil is unjust; while other women feel it is not unjust but a decision they made on their own in dedication to their religion. Still, for many women especially the ones in Western countries, they have no choice and for that reason alone, they are being made to wear a

Burqa bans are unlawfully stripping Muslim women of their right to follow and show their commitment to their religion. Many countries in the United Nations are beginning to put a nationwide ban on wearing burqas in public. This restricts Islamic women by giving them the choice to either defy their religion, or stay inside their house and not get anything done. Not only does this restrict daily activities, but it makes it challenging for islamic women to get a quality education. Overall, countries are putting a national ban on niqabs, forcing muslim women to betray their religious beliefs in order to perform simple activities.