Why Should Women Stay In The Military

For years women have been trying to gain gender equality throughout the working world, along with in the military. Since the beginning of a uniformed military, women could not serve in military occupational specialty (MOS) positions that put them in direct combat roles. Although many women have contributed in significant ways, they have not been authorized to serve in MOS such as infantry, artillery, or armor. As the war on terrorism has developed since 9/11, women have slowly worked their way farther into the military and its many roles. This resulted in women being placed into direct combat roles. Though women have been allowed into many different roles, there is still one battle that they have yet to win and this time the majority is not backing them. Women are trying to gain access to United States Special Operations units in every branch of the military and the majority of these operators are not happy about it. While some people believe women deserve equality and the chance to do what men can do in the military, that is why women should not be

Men have always been looked upon as the leading sex. Looking back through history women have been the ones who take care of the home and children, while men are the ones who work and go to war. However in recent years there’s no doubt that women have become much more equal in the work force. Nevertheless men are still the ones who are forced to fight our wars when the time calls for it. Many think that women should be entirely equal to men having their choice to be drafted taken away but the fact is that they are physically at a disadvantage, too emotionally oriented, and the increase of female presence would have a more negative impact in the military in the way of social interactions.

Over the past few years, there has been huge discussions when the topic of equality for women who have joined the military is being brought up. Being that gender equality is a big thing in the military now, I decided to chose this topic and discuss how I feel about it. According to the United States constitution, all men are created equal and this does not exclude women. One of the main things I learned is that equality for women in the military is a major issue. There should be no gender inequality in the United States military period. Most jobs are now open to women that were once allowed for only a man to do but when it comes to something such as the military, it should have always been that way No one should be told they can’t do something when it requires fighting for your country. Even back when men were drafted in the military, women should have been able to get drafted as well. You would think the military would take any and everybody that is willing to fight for his or her country simply because it would make our job easier as a whole. Frequently, women are stereotyped as feeble and incapable of doing certain things. Nevertheless, this should not be applied in any kind of career, particularly in the military.

The big worry stems from an idea about the degeneration of the combat community structure. So, with that in mind, let 's suppose that women are granted full entry and that the requirements for men and women are exactly the same. Let’s also suppose nobody tampers with the vetting process, meaning no overseeing, “Yes Men generals,” pushing women through, as well as no misogynistic gate-keeper putting an extra sandbag in a girls’ rucksack prior to some training

could not do the required amount, so the Marine Corps had to make a change. Conzachi states: The United States Marine Corps quietly announced recently on social media that the current requirement for female Marines to do a minimum of three (3) pull-ups as part of their training by January 1, 2014 has been delayed for another year. Currently, females are not required to do even a single pull-up, but rather a test called a “flexed-arm hang” in which they can score points based on the amount of time that they can hang from a pull-up bar absent any gear. A maximum score can be obtained if they hang for 70 seconds with their chin over the bar.

In recent years, the United States military has been expanding and adjusting its policies to remove as much discrimination as possible. Although women have been allowed to enlist in the military since World War II, many positions and MOS’s in each branch do not permit women to perform them. Such positions are primarily combative, and require a large amount of physical and mental strength and endurance. While many feel that this is sexist and discriminates against women, it is simply a matter of whether it would be beneficial to have women placed into combat for national safety as well as the safety for the other soldiers. Since the majority of females cannot meet the requirements necessary to fill these combative positions, there is no need to revise the military regulations on the matter and in turn risk the lives of other soldiers and the protection of citizens. Despite its positive impact on removing discrimination and misogyny in the armed forces, it would negatively impact military operations and efficiency.

Women believe it is not fair for a combat job in the military be only suitable for men. Not only do they want to fight on the front lines to express their patriotic attitude, but also reap from the benefits that come with being in the military. College is an expensive investment after high school and often people join the military to have college paid for. This could be a tremendous help for those struggling to pay for school. Also, when out of college, a military experience is an appealing trait for getting employed. The military also has numerous other benefits like health care, dental insurance, care insurance, and discounts on various items. These benefits do seem charming, but other girls just want to show they have what it takes to fight for our country. The first two women, out of nineteen, completed Army Ranger School in August of 2015. Ranger school is known to be one of the vigorous schools you can attend in the Army. Ranger School has approximately a 60% drop out rate. It wasn't until the year 2015 until they allowed women to take on the exhausting course. Capt. Kristen Griest and 1st Lt. Shaye Haver were the first two women to complete Ranger School in history. These women were expected to meet a male's standard in everything they completed. "No one I knew met the women's standard -- they made it a point to meet, the men's standard, because we knew that

Frankly, I find it surprising and almost offensive that the armed forces would lower the minimum standards in an effort to allow more women into combat roles. It is dangerous to those women, and for all those who would serve with them. If the pressure to lower standards in order to allow more women into combat is coming from D.C. politicians, that needs to be addressed as

Women have been enlisted in the armed forces since June 12, 1948, when President Truman signed the Woman’s Armed Services Integration Act. Throughout this time, women have served several different roles; however, women were not allowed to serve in combat forces. Arguments offer the idea that women are physically and emotionally capable of performing the same as men, Researchers have proven that only a small percentage of women are capable of performing the physically demanding aspects as that of men, although there are a select few women that are capable of completing the qualification standards to join the combat forces. With that being said women should be allowed to fight on the front lines.

Ever since the Revolutionary War, women have been serving in the military serving different roles, mostly the job of being a nurse or medical personnel. Their main duties included cooking, nursing and fixing the men’s uniforms, but putting women on the front lines in combat is where the issue begins. Many researchers have argued that the American leaders are discriminating against women, while other researchers argue why we aren’t trying to protect our mothers and daughters. It should not be allowed for women to participate in ground combat due to the physical nature of the conflict, psychological and emotional differences between men and women, and lack of support from today’s society to see its female population

Many people disagree with women joining combat forces because they think that women are the weaker sex. As stated by Captain Katie, US Marine corps, in the article, “WOMEN IN COMBAT PROS AND CONS”, “The standards of physical fitness have been set to suit men, and women attempting to reach them will over-stretch themselves...Women serving in integrated units will suffer higher injury rates as a result of this” (1). Meaning that men in combat deeply believe that women are not suited to meet combat standards. In spite of the beliefs of many, women have proved that it is possible to accommodate with training. Women can avoid female injury rates by extra pre-training for muscle building. According to the article, “Army Ranger School’s Assessment of women”, Commander Lamothe states, “Eight of the initial 19 women made it through the initial Ranger Assessment Phase...the women were joined by 156 male soldiers who training in the mountains…” (2). This example shows that women are capable to meet standards, they just need official military support to get there. Allowing a mixed gender force may keep the military strong. It will only join the capability of taking down the opponent. In addition, it will double the talent pool for sensitive jobs that require interpersonal skills that not just anyone can have. Women are no stronger than men, they both have strengths and that is what allows them to be in the military positions they are in. The changing nature of modern warfare and the critical role that women have played, led to a historic policy changer. SWAN is a service network that supports the women in combat policy. “SWAN believes that the most effective military is one that integrates women into all sectors”

In the article “Women in Combat: Education, Leadership Keys To Success” Jacqueline Hames talks about the different concerns there are for women joining the military. Hames discusses how different groups are actively trying to decrease the health concerns that arise for women that join the military. No matter what branch of the military women choose to join there will be health concerns that arise, so women should not be banned from some roles in the military just because of health concerns, and allowed in others. According to Hames, direct combat roles for women raise certain physical and psychological health concerns, but that the Department of Defense and the Army are actively researching on how to find a way to still integrate women into these positions. Also, Hames says that the Women’s Health Task Force is focused on the gender-specific health needs of women who serve in the military, helping to make sure that the military meets all the health needs of women and men equally. Women should not be banned from certain roles in the military just because of some health concerns that may arise, they should have the right to choose if they would like to serve in the military or not, just as men

Some people question about putting women in combat and it’s whether they have the necessary strength and stamina. They also have said the inclusion of women in different combat units may harm unit cohesion, similar to the argument regarding gays. They say that Americans won’t tolerate large numbers of women coming home in body bags, but apparently it wouldn’t matter if a man came home in a body bag according to this. Some people think just because some people in the military are women that it means they can’t do the same things that men in the military which is not true. Women have

Interactions among individuals from diverse races, cultures, religious backgrounds and genders have become a key contribution towards helping to define society. Society has set a certain standard for women to follow. Women in society have a lot of pressure put on them like how they are expected to work and then go home to their husband and children to cook and clean for them. Gender integration in the military has always faced the issue of social recognition, whether society can accept how women will be treated and respected in the military. Throughout the history of the United States military, women have battled alongside men in the in every major battle since the American Revolution. Although it wasn’t until the last two years of World

Women believe that they can serve because other countries and nations like the Israeli, the Kurds, and Palestinians allow women to be in their infantry, but they are only allowed because it is necessary for their survival and not about equality. Not allowing women in the infantry is not about subduing women’s right and blocking off gender equality but it is for the combat effectiveness. Capt. Serrano and other Marine officers have the same view to not allow women in the