Why Shouldn T Shakespeare Be Taught In Schools

To begin with, Shakespeare is very hard for most 9th graders to read. Shakespeare uses language that is not modern and students most likely did not learn. As said by Powell, the director of Salisbury Playhouse, “Shakespeare had made them feel stupid rather than empowered.” (Powell). Most 9th graders do not get the language and don’t

Some people might say that Shakespeare makes great plays that people enjoy. Finally,Shakespeare is very difficult to understand and it's very hard to comprehend when it's being taught by a teacher. The teachers can teach about more modern writers that we might be able to understand. Shakespeare is 400 years old and i think we should be learning more about writers from the twenty first century. That's why Shakespeare should not be taught in high schools around the

When Shakespeare was a kid going to grammar school, a school open to boys only by the way! they learned Latin, Greek and rhetoric, persuasion through logical argument. Students read Latin and Greek writers to learn about the history of ancient Greece and "the glory that was Rome” and this material was translated by them into English or French after many hours of work. I'm glad the school curriculum of the 21 st century has evolved and we no longer spend our days doing boring stuff like that! Their old-fashioned, subjects that have little relevance in the modern world of the internet and space travel. The question is: shouldn't we allow our education system to further evolve and file Shakespeare in the same drawer where we've stuck Homer,

Students aren't the only ones who need to learn the message behind Shakespeare, adults at times need to as well. The message teaches people about the world, and about how peoples decisions catch up with them at times."Shakespeare Teaches us about love, honor, duty. About parents and children. About ambition and greed. These are the things that all of us face, the things that make us human." (J. Holtham, 2). The message is quite clear in a way. If Shakespeare can teach us about human conditions, then anyone can. "I don’t believe that a long-dead, British guy is the only writer who can teach my students about human condition. I do not believe that not viewing "Romeo and Juliet" or any other modern adaptation of a Shakespeare play will make my students less able to go out into the world and understand language or human behavior." (Dana Dusbiber, 1). There are other authors out in the world who have the same message, why not read a new author, rather than Shakespeare? Shakespeare uses his own words in his own way, to show that what he is trying to tell us about love and greed, are important, and no one else could teach us better. "Shakespeare is more then just a 'long-old dead British guy' and I believe he has as much to teach us about the

The morals and values presented in his works speak to the audience, often offering a new perspective on the world in which they live. Students are affected by the powerful and complex characters and are rewarded with profound insights into human nature and behavior.I firmly believe that Shakespeare's works, like no other literature in the high school curriculum, challenge and invigorate the minds of students. Because of the complex characters, difficult vocabulary and style in which he writes, students must elevate their level of learning to grasp a clear understanding of his works. Shakespeare's plays hold intricate meanings and messages. His

If one was able to look into our classroom, they would see the kids rushing to the whiteboard to try and get a part that they can read. Spots filled, they anxiously wait to continue on with the story. Then that person would ask, “Why would they be so excited to read something so old and outdated?” Well to answer, it’s because Shakespeare’s work is still applicable to our lives today. Shakespeare should stay in the 9th grade curriculum, because it strongly relates to today's day and age, keeps the kids in the class active and paying attention, and helps convey a strong message that everyone should follow.

Is William Shakespeare worth teaching in the ninth grade curriculum? Shakespeare is not worth teaching in the ninth grade curriculum.Shakespeare lived from 1564 to 1616 he was 52 years old when he died, He wrote 38 plays. poems and sonnets. He was an english playwright, poet and actor. His plays have been translated into 75 different languages. That's all we know about him.

Despite the fact that Shakespeare’s plays were written hundreds of years ago they still retain their relevance today, surprising students with their uncanny ability to relate to the hearts of all, both then and now.

Do you ever wonder why Shakespeare is still taught in high school. In high school, Shakespeare was shoved down our throats and I despised Shakespeare and his works. I thought that they were pointless and was just a way to torture high school students, but the more I think about what Shakespeare is trying to teach through his works. The more I respect and understand the themes and the language of his works. The more that you understand the more that you can relate, the more that you can relate the more that you can reflect on the things that you have learned. In this essay, I will argue that Shakespeare’s works are important to learn . I will support my argument by explaining the universal themes in Shakespeare’s

His work touched an extensive amount of different topics and themes, all of which are still relevant today. His writing is the foundation of some of the most classic literature, and a great amount of modern pieces can be traced back to his style and ideas in some way. His language deepens the analytical, reading and writing skills of young readers, and develops an appreciation for the progression of the English language through time. If Shakespeare were to be terminated from school curriculums, students would lose important, education enhancing aspects of English and would be unable to create a far more in-depth understanding of the literary work of the past and

Where will student be today if it wasn’t for Shakespeare? Student wouldn’t be living the life if it wasn’t for Shakespeare? Shakespeare was a great writer making some of the best plays of his time for example Romeo and Juliet. This is why I believe Shakespeare should be in the 9th grade curriculum, because in the 9th grade people should know about Shakespeare, also some student should know about Shakespeare because is good to know what Shakespeare has done for

Shakespeare is dead. Shakespeare is not relevant in today’s times. It is very boring for students to listen to the material, and only a certain type of personality can appreciate Shakespeare.

William Shakespeare should not be taught in ninth grade because it has lack a of proper english.The language may have been considered proper back then when it was used, but in current society it is not used, therefore is no longer necessary to be taught. Some readers can be confused about what they are saying, which is not good when you are trying to point out important facts about certain things. Critics think that they should change the wording to the so people can understand. If the actors could have change it the english if they wanted to.The use of the old english is unuseful at the point now.

Most English teachers adore Shakespeare, but what about students? Is Shakespeare really relevant to high school curriculum? Shakespeare is not diverse enough for today's students, difficult to understand, and is meant to be seen and heard, not read. Shakespeare was an English playwright, poet, and actor. He was from Stratford-Upon-Avon, United Kingdom and lived from 1564-1616. He wrote 38 plays, poems and sonnets that were translated into 75 languages. Shakespeare should not be taught in a ninth grade curriculum because it is not culturally diverse to represent today’s students, he is difficult to understand and Shakespeare is meant to be seen and heard, not read.

William Shakespeare's Relevance Today For as long as formal education has existed in Britain it has been a largely standard assumption that teaching the works of William Shakespeare is relevant and necessary. Perhaps the relevance of his writing is taken for granted, perhaps it is necessary to re-examine the role of Shakespeare for the modern audience. There are indeed many people who question the relevance of this 440 year old playwright to a 21st century audience, taking it even as far as perhaps the greatest heresy of all, questioning the necessity of GCSE pupils learning Shakespeare at all. This “proposed vandalism from the policymakers” (Guardian 09/02/01) is opposed wholesale by supporters