preview

Why Stories Matter Convincingly Questions The Belief That Securing More Accurate Narratives Of The Past Essay

Decent Essays

The postcorrective historiography of Why Stories Matter convincingly questions the belief that securing more accurate narratives of the past is possible and desirable. Hemmings intentionally sidesteps the philosophical question at the heart of most histories and historiographies: Are more accurate and unexpected renderings of the past in existence, waiting to be uncovered? Hemmings’s concerns are epistemological: what matters is how the past is depicted and what is remembered or forgotten as a result. They are also methodological: feminist scholars need the requisite tools to understand how the past is portrayed and how it might be portrayed differently. The existential question remains unanswered, which in her view leaves room for “unpredictability” in conceptualizing the past. One’s reply to the question depends largely on how one defines their source base, however. Although the extensiveness of Hemmings’s study is astonishing, her study begins and ends with feminist theory and the affective impulses escaping feminist theory’s discursive threshold (and inadvertently shaping it). Therefore, the social, cultural, economic, and geopolitical forces that do not fall under the category of feminist theory, such as structural and institutional relationships and forces that make possible the production of academic feminism, cannot be included as part of its history. Why should the scope of feminist history be limited to only what feminist scholars have published? Important factors

Get Access