Why Teaching Intellingent Design and Creationism in Schools and not just Evolution Isn't a Good Idea

The debate over teaching evolution in public schools is not new at all but the debate has been elevated through the media over the past few years. Conservative Christians and other conservatives serving on school boards (particularly in the South) have been insisting that if schools are going to buy textbooks that have evolution chapters then they should also have a place in that textbook near the evolution chapter for creationism. Progressives and scholars that understand the scientific basis for evolution argue that there's nothing wrong with putting creationism or "intelligent design" in textbooks but that subject is not science-based and therefore should be published in the "religion" chapter (if there is one). Should evolution be taught in public schools? The answer is yes, most certainly; to ignore evolution is to deprive public school students of some of the most important knowledge relating to our planet and our society. Scientific ignorance is unacceptable in a country that calls itself the "greatest nation on earth."

Given that certain polls estimate that almost half to as many as sixty-six percent of Americans do not believe in pure evolution(Branch; Morris), it is hard to argue with a plurality or majority of the population whether or not to believe in evolution. To many, it is not a matter of

Because of this, it should be taught in schools just as other theory with scientific proof. “Evolution should be one of the first things you learn in school…and what they (children) get instead? Sacred hearts and incense. Shallow, empty religion.”[Sunday Telegraph (UK) interview with Richard Dakins, Sept.26, 1999]. This shows that kids would not be learning all about how humans or animals came about and if you don’t know of a theory to at least give you and idea, and then you are not fully informed to what you should know. Some people think along the lines of “I have encountered a few “creationists” and because they were usually nice, intelligent people, I have been unable to decide whether they were _ really _ mad, or only pretending to be mad. If I as a religious person, I would consider creationism nothing less then blasphemy. Do its adherents imagine that God is a cosmic hoaxer who has created that whole vast fossil record for the sole purpose of misleading mankind?”[Arthur C. Clarke, June 5, 1998, in the essay “Presidents, Experts, and Asteroids,” pp 5322-3]. Sentices have found many fossils that show the evolution of certain species. The fossils show the species at different stages of their development. This contradicts the basis of creatisum which states that God created each specie as we know it today. So how do creationists say that evolution is not true? Evloution has proof,so why not teach it in schools?

There are diverse embodiments of counterfeit science, cheap science, and deviant science. Over time, mankind has seen the rise and fall of various scientific fields of study. However, none ever seem to vanish completely. Humanity’s views of the flat earth, astrology, crop circles, ancient astronauts, and perpetual motion continue to gain advocates even today. These are compelling paradigms of how human beings possess the ability to hold on to various forms of reasoning without any use of appurtenant evidence. With that being said, the matter of intelligent design and its counterparts, Darwinism, evolution and creationism, are noteworthy topics to discuss.

In public schools, evolution is taught as the way the world came to be. In most cases, if a student believes otherwise they get in trouble for talking about their own beliefs. Many people who follow different religions believe creationism. Creationism should be taught in public schools as a valid view of how earth and present forms came to be.

If you continually ask difficult questions to an evolutionist and if you ask increasing specific questions they are bound to eventually and possibly even quickly run out of answers. Evolution has to many questions that are posed that they cannot give an answer to, such as how the earth was created their answer is that somehow particles joined and the Big Bang happened, this leaves many unanswered questions. Fossils disprove evolution, no creature actually “evolved” into a different species and if they did the changes would be much more dramatic. In Genesis 1 it says that all creatures reproduce “after their kind” which basically means they stay the same species and they reproduce with their own species, therefore fossils prove intelligent design. Spontaneous reproduction cannot be proved through evolution either, the unanswered question of how there are two different sexes of species and how they evolved into that way from one species isn't something they can prove, with an intelligent designer or a God then it is much easier to explain how there are two different sexes. Life from non-life also cannot be supported, evolutionists have the same “random particles” answer but a designer would clearly answer the question of how life began. Organ development also cannot be proved by evolutionists. How did the life survive growing the blood vessels and organs? Did it have to only have half a stomach and 10% of blood

IN fact, during the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case, it was found that it is “unconstitutional for a Pennsylvania school district to present intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in high school biology courses because it is a religious viewpoint that advances ‘a particular version of Christianity,’” (Goodstein 1) And what is more, it is morally wrong to teach a science that we know to be false to the future generations of our country. Many people argue that Evolution is “just a theory” and “has large gaps” while failing to realize that a scientific theory is considered valid fact, especially when it is as broadly accepted as Evolution. Furthermore, the theory of Evolution has physical evidence, regardless of how Creationists like to interpret it, which is more than can be said for Intelligent Design. Fossil records, carbon dating, rock superposition, and DNA relations are all superb and examples, to name only a few. Many other Creationists would argue that it is “unfair” to teach one theory and not the other. Besides the obvious constitutional problems and the problem with Intelligent Design being deemed an illegitimate science, this statement is still a tough pill to swallow. Essentially, these people are saying that regardless of one’s religious beliefs, all students need to be

“If religion is not allowed to be taught in schools then why is evolution being taught? Evolution requires much faith in order to believe that the big bang happened and that the Earth is billions of years old. It is not a fact, it is based on assumptions, and it takes more faith in order to believe that nothing made something.” In addition to this, due to the flawed logic in studies and making false facts, evolution should not be taught in

It is to show respect to the 66% of people in your survey those who don't share similar beliefs. It also gives right to the parents to decide whether or not they want their child to be exposed to creationism. This is why believe it is not okay to teach creationism in school as a science. Also if a parent or child does want to learn about creationism than the perfect place to be taught that would be a religious affiliation,the Internet, home, or if you attend a church of some kind you can ask plenty about it there. From experience we know that you can learn a lot about creationism in these setting but believe they should be kept separate in order to allow parents and students to be able to pick and choose what they're exposed to. We also must state that we are not saying to prohibit the learning of creationism, we are countering the argument that it belongs in the science classroom due to its bias and philosophical manner. You also stated that “All in all, creationism should be taught in public schools along with evolution because they are both belief systems, it would help students use critical thinking skills to see what they believe about the models, and people want it to be taught

Personally, I believe that when studying science that evidence of the glory of the Lord is going to prevail. As stated in Genesis, the Lord created everything thing we see, smell, feel, taste, and hear in six days; therefore, while studying science we are really studying God. If creation science is taught to children starting in the early years of school, they will have a better understanding of the glory of the Lord even at a young age. Logically speaking, creationism should be taught in schools if you wish students to learn about the glory of God. Because I strongly believe that creationism should be taught in all levels of education, I chose to attend Lee University and take Physical Science. Throughout this semester, I hope develop a better

This sums up the question of whether or not creationism should be taught in schools. Creationism is the belief that a divine entity created everything, all of the worlds and all life. Another definition of creationism explains it as “a supernatural version [of how worlds and life came into being], often based on the Bible, of life’s origins and development” (Moore and Cotner 1). It stands opposed to scientific theories like Darwinian evolution, or “a change in the allelic frequency in a population over time due to differential reproductive success as a result of inherited variation” (Moore and Cotner 1). While it is true that

I feel that both evolution and Creationism should be taught in public schools. Evolution should be taught in biology class as a scientific concept and Creationism should be taught in history along with religion. Children should be educated on both topics because knowledge will help them develop their own beliefs rather than just going along with what other people may believe. Teachers should be able to teach about evolution and Creation without giving their own personal bias.

Many educators will disagree that creationism should be taught in public schools because they say it is disapproved by science and will be a waste of time since it is religious. Creationism is no more religious than the theory of the Big Bang, if you ask me it takes greater faith to believe that something came out of nothing. The Big Bang theory is

Humans came to exist on this planet from the need for cells to adapt to their environment for evolutionary purposes. The theory of evolution is something I believe to more than a theory, but actual fact. At least in my eyes it is, But I do understand the viewpoint of creationism and their ideologies. After our class debates I still firmly believe creationism should not be mentioned in class, but intelligent design is something that should be taught complementary to evolution. Once I learned more about intelligent design today my first reaction is that it's an interesting theory that makes sense. While I don't necessarily believe the idea of it. I think can still be something can be taught in biology class. Also, creationism can be taught

Creationists say that teaching evolution in school would go against what they believe about the origins of man. But Evolution does not cover the origins of man, but how entire species have changed with time. US public schools should teach evolution as scientific fact because there is fossil evidence, bacterial evidence, and there is evidence hidden inside of the genes in all living things.