Why Texas Is The Most Important Star Out Of The Fifty.

Texas has all three political cultures all over the state, but when people outside of

Throughout Texas history, especially in the 1920s, the state had many impediments barring a normal life from anyone who was not anglo-american. From politics to churches to even bars, life was purposely made hard for anyone who was different from this standard of purity or whiteness. However, despite the overwhelming culture of white supremacy in Texas that impeded any opposing cultural differences, there remained pockets of differing ideological backgrounds and attitudes. Consequently, clusters of progressive communities became normal in Texan society, exemplifying the deepening trends of discrimination into Texas history and the lack of control anglos held on the southern portion of Texas.

Texas will meet the increased demands placed on it by an ever-growing population with continuing to focus on and expanding the four industries (cattle, cotton, timber, and minerals) that have dominated its history. The expansion and increased revenue of these industries will help Texas sustain and even nurture its population growth. For years Texas politics has been dominated by individualism and traditionalism. The tradionalistic and individualistic cultures that abound in Texas can make this issue difficult to solve. Expansion often brings change in the many political and financial areas of these industries.. Texas individualists have a negative viewpoint of government and are against government involvement or regulation in industry and Texas traditionalists favor wealthy individuals and

When we think of a Texas hero, we think of people with important titles, like Sam Houston or Stephen F. Austin, but never once do we think about those people who gave up a pleasurable future just for us. We never think about those people like José Antonio Navarro, who never even gave a second thought to abandon Texas.

There were several extremely fascinating aspects regarding the history of Texas found in Passionate Nation's pages 195-219 and Major Problems in Texas History's pages 146-150 and 162-167. One of the most salient of these was the fact that Texas was its own independent nation. This fact was fairly startling for a number of different reasons. One of these is the fact that the United States allowed another nation to be created within its borders. This is something rarely done in history, and probably never done again in the history of the United States.

Texas is one of the strongest and Republican states among the fifty American states. However, Texas was politically dominated by the Democratic Party for more than a hundred years until the late 1960s, when the Republican party began to gain an increasing political strength. “In a reversal of alignments, since the late 1960s, the Republican Party has grown more prominent within the state based on an influx of primarily white voters (the majority in the state) from the Democratic Party. By the mid-1990s, it became the state 's dominant political party” (Politics of Texas). But this situation may not last so long because Texas is going through demographic shifts. The Hispanic or Latino population as well as minorities has been growing in the

This item focuses less on finding the historical truth events that occurred during the battle at the Alamo and more on how popular understandings of this battle have influenced, evolved, and clouded daily social/cultural relations between Texans and Mexicans. This item proved quite useful in providing a source grounded in exquisite research and analysis that looks at how society was transformed not only from the battle for the Alamo, but also the understandings, myths, and legends that resulted from the battle. One weakness of this piece is its complexity. Although I still gained valuable information from this piece,

Texas’s liberty is an essential part of our culture and who we are today. The heroic soldiers fought long and hard for Texas’s liberty and their sacrifice shouldn’t be forgotten. Our history is also important to remember. Learning about our independence from Mexico in school is essential so we know how Texas became what it is today.

In Ivans article, she explains that culturally she identifies Texas as resembling a mix between people from “Arkansas” and people from “Alaska” (Ivan 783). Ivan perpetuates the fact that Texans much rather identify as “Texans rather than Americans abroad” (Ivan 785). Additionally Texas Tribune took a poll on respondents on whether if they considered themselves “Texas first and Americans second” (Blank 2). The tribune found that surprisingly twenty-seven percent considered themselves Texas first and Americans second. However when polling only democrat and liberals an average of eighty-eight percent of men and women identified as Americans first and an Average of thirty-six percent of Republicans identified as Texans first. The two previous topics; Homophobia and Racism strongly relate to Texas identification due to the fact of the “old south” stereotype and proven research of the two hate crimes constantly

When most people think of Texas, they immediately think of how big the state is, and sometimes the misconception is that it is the biggest state when it actually is not. However, there is more to the state than its size. Texas is populated with a majority of racial minorities, governed by the most limited government that follows a very minimalist model. In Erica Grieder’s Big, Hot, Cheap, and Right: What American Can Learn from the Strange Genius of Texas, she points out that the genius behind Texas is the model it lives which calls for low taxes and minimal services, a limited government constructed from prior disdain of the federal government, and the creation of a business friendly state that helps stimulate the growth in economy and in population; and though each carry their own disadvantages, Texas seems to find a way to teach America something.

There are many reasons why the hearts and eyes of Texans glow when asked about their home state. Texas pride seems an infectious emotion among the population of the southern state. This could stem from any number of things but there is one facet of Texas’ history that warrants a great deal of pride, and that is the Texas Revolution. The event breeds pride partly because no state in the US can boast of individual sovereignty preceding statehood. Although the rebellion occurred before Texas’ annexation, without any aid from an official United States Army, the confrontation will forever be celebrated as a quintessential piece of American history.

According to a recent poll, 70 percent of Texas residents say that they are proud of their state and rank it among the best places to live. One of the most striking features about the poll was that the residents of the Lone Star State ranked their trust in local and state government significantly higher than 88 percent of residents in all other states (Aasen, 20014). The Texas legislature is so efficient in its tasks that it meets less than any other legislature in the United States. Coming from a Southeastern state, this trust in government is a concept that is quite unfamiliar to me.

The book addresses the very often overlooked and critical elements of the state’s history which include the methodology obtained by marginalized Texans in their pursuit of more just, equal and humane society. Minority groups that challenged established capitalists, industrialists or racists on pragmatic grounds frequently triumphed. The prices the Texans generally compromised with inadequate economic, social and political reform.

Texas is a state that has always been recognized for its size and politics. Elections are a huge part of democratic societies that are intended for citizens to choose their public leaders and approve the policies set by candidates. Political parties and interest groups also play a key role in shaping opportunities for public participation. Most Texans and historians know that the Democratic Party’s historical dominance is important to state politics. It is less likely that people are not aware of the consequences of the one-party system for public participation and democracy in Texas. Like many of the rim South states, the white elitist belonged to the Democratic Party which stemmed from the end of Reconstruction until the late 20th

While Texas leader Stephen Austin initially had no contempt toward Mexicans, the Anglo-American citizens in the area did. The American Texans of the 1800’s defined Mexicans as “a race alien to everything that Americans held dear” (De Leon 4). This sentiment would serve as the primary catalyst to the Texas secession from Mexico. When Austin began colonizing the area, he envisioned a place in which Anglo-Americans and Tejanos, Mexicans living in Texas, could live together. Eventually, though, the public opinions of North American settlers in the territory and in Washington would make him realize that the goal of unity between the two groups was impossible.