In this day and age a large and powerful military is very important for most countries, and so in many of them you are required to serve one year in the military after high school. In the United States, however, it is purely voluntary to join the military. This topic has been talked about for many years and there is still a large dispute. Some people think it is unfair, and others think it is necessary. For a military to grow strong and powerful youth is crucial, so 18 year olds should be required to serve a year in the military. Men and women of the age of 18 are most likely to be in the best shape of their lives. 18 year olds should be sent to the military because they are young, and fit. The training will have a more positive impact on them and their bodies will be able to handle it better than a 30 or 40 year old going through it. Also, by your mid to late 20's you may have a wife and kids that would be left behind. Drafting a single 18 year old is much easier handle. Why take an older, slower person when there could be a much younger, quicker person of better shape fighting our wars. …show more content…
If we send 18 year olds in the military it will give them these qualities at a very young age. Kids these days are thought of as less responsible and respectable than past generations. The military can change that. Being in the military requires concentration, devotion, and motivation. It is a very real life thing that kids are cut off from. Training 18 year olds to be in the military teaches them respect of their superiors and inferiors. It also teaches them a much higher level of responsibility, unlike if they are partying and drinking in college. These skills are necessary to be successful in the world today, and will better the life ahead of these
During the Vietnam War, the United States' government instituted a mandatory draft. Since it was mandatory, if a man's birthday was selected, he had to report to boot camp or face prosecution. This system was both fair and unfair; it was fair because it was not biased, and it was unfair because the men strongly disliked being forced to go to war. In times of war, the United States' government should not be allowed to institute a mandatory draft because it can cause severe mental issues and the young adults are not always prepared to take on the gruesome task of defending their country.
“Should the United State of America adopt the idea that every American citizen should serve at least 2 years in the military?”, in my opinion, this is a terrible idea. America is “The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave”. Going into the military should be a personal choice.What would this benefit anyways? This is, in my opinion, a bad idea, this would change the course of America’s history as we know it.
There are a lot of graduates fresh out of high schools that make the decision to use the military. There are some people that join the military because that is a fast and easy choice for them. The military gives everyone a wide variety of options. College for instance, the military allows you to serve your country and still have time to attend college and get a degree if you choose to do that. People that choose to join the military get the option to go to college anytime they feel during their military career. The military pays for part or all the tuition. The military has four different branches, Air Force, Army, Navy, and Marines. Each branch offers different trades. Air Force for example, teaches people to fly, have mechanical skills,
With all the controversy surrounding mandatory military service, past and recent incidents have shown a greater need to protect ourselves from those who wish to do us harm. Continued decline in enlistment, and a
Would you be willing to drop everything right now and join the military? Thousands of men were troubled with this question in the twentieth century. The United States draft, also called conscription, was first used during the Civil War but later used in WWI, WWII, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. Napoleon was the first general to use the modern draft. In 1940 FDR signed the Training Service Act of 1940 starting the first formal draft in the United States, but in 1973 congress decided to have an all-volunteer military. President Carter decided to resume the draft in 1980 due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Today the draft is not used but the US still requires its 18-year-old
The United States of America is the nation with the largest, most powerful, and most funded military. The United States has been known to commonly get involved with other nations purely based off the fact that it is militarily capable. In the past the United States has had to implement several drafts to support the military’s need for more troops. The question is, in this day and age, would it be acceptable for the United States to order a national mandatory military conscription to fuel the military? There are always those that are exempt from military service, as well as those who cannot be exempt which increases the gap of inequality which will harm some more than others. Due to evidence presented in previous conscription efforts, possible
As mentioned above, military officials see the draft as unnecessary. In addition to these officials, public opposition to the draft is growing. According to a survey, 80 percent of Americans opposed the draft in 2007 (Text 5, graphic). If the majority of the country opposes something that would directly affect its youth, then that something should not be reinstituted. Public opinion on the reinstitution of the draft reflects the opposition that would be present if it were reinstituted. Draft-eligible Americans would most certainly try to find a way out of military service, as draftees have done in the past. But because the public opinion on the draft has shifted dramatically since 1980, where 59 percent of Americans were in favor of the draft, the resentment associated with serving would most likely be higher (Text 5, graphic). This resentment is almost inevitable, especially with pro-draft arguments claiming the need to serve in the military in exchange for citizenship rights (Text 1, line 61). Rights granted by citizenship should not have requirements in order to make use of them; that is why one is granted these rights with U.S. citizenship and not after serving in the military. Not only are citizens’ rights at stake, but also the right to education. Bill Maxwell argues that serving in the military should be a requirement in order to attend college (Text 3, line 45). Military service as a requirement for college would definitely
The legal drinking age is twenty-one. The government has concluded that the mind is mature at age twenty-one. If the mind at twenty-one to drink but not at seventeen shouldn't the legal age to enroll in the military be twenty-one as well. My impression on this is that the immaturity of a seventeen-year-old who is easily persuaded does not have the capacity to make
The Military Drinking Age Should Be Lowered The citizens from the United States of America are known for the constant love they show for the men and women that fight everlasting battles and pernicious wars to keep the country a protected place to call home. The country trusts these individuals to keep the citizens safe and that is precisely what the military accomplishes. A person can enter the military for service at eighteen years of age. However, in most states a person must be twenty-one years old to purchase or drink alcohol legally, even with military identification.
Think also, the possibility of forcing young criminals between the ages of 18 and 25 to join the military. Maybe due to joining the military, these young criminals would be reformed into honorable, self-respecting individuals or become leaders of our great nation. In addition, if military conscription were implemented, the tax payers would not have to pay for the juvenile criminals to be locked up in maximum or minimum security centers.
The current drinking age should not be lowered to 18 despite the responsibilities that are given at that age. While at age 18 teenagers receive a handful of new choices and responsibilities. Of those some may argue that if at 18 teenagers can join the military and are ultimately risking their life that they also should be able have the choice of consuming alcohol. Along with everything else granted to an 18-year-old as they enter adulthood it is not enough to lower the legal drinking age. Let us start with the strongest comment of this argument, joining the military. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, describe the types of occupations and the number of enlisted personals in each occupation in a table. The table includes the total amount of personals enlisted in combat specialty for all branches of military at 151,501(Table 1).
The age of 18 has been the minimum age to join any United States military branch for decades now. Many people would like to see the minimum age to become 21, the same age you can drink, but it is, for many reasons, impractical. The age of legal consent in the United States is a major factor to discuss. Other issues will be the effects of joining at a young age. When a teenager turns 18 he or she becomes an adult and is allowed to make their own choices. The minimum age of 18 years to join any branch of the United States military should remain the same because at that age a person is considered to be a consenting adult.
Less than one percent of all Americans are enlisted in the military. An even smaller percentage of high school students are enlisted. Students are thought to be incompetent, and not mature enough to decide on enlisting in the military. However, students should be allowed to join the military. The military offers many benefits students can use to help their future. The protection of our country is not overlooked for recruits; they are awarded many personal benefits as well. Tuition assistance, job training, and many benefits that help prepare recruits for occupations while enlisted. Not only are students getting great benefits, but they are also in a small group of professional workers.
Most people have, at one point or another, considered what they were going to do with their lives. Whether a person would like to become an activist, an artisan or a business professional, the military has something for everyone. Finding a path in life is often filled with uncertainty and procrastination. The United States military is a path in itself, should one wish to retire from it; however, should a person wish to make their own path, there are benefits for that as well that can remove all doubt and curb procrastination. Due to these many benefits, I believe that it should be mandatory for all adults to enlist for a minimum of twenty-four months.
As many other countries mandate young adults partaking in the military for two years, the United States should follow suit. Many beneficial consequences would be rendered as a result of the increase in service. This would also be a great commencement into the real world for any young adult. These statements can be explored by discussing the benefits of free college tuition, disciplined young adults who are ready to follow orders, and the sheer power of numbers.