Why The Drinking Age Should Be Illegal

Car crashes, sexual assaults, domestic abuse, and alcohol poisoning are just a few of the reasons why people under the age of 21 are devastated by the illegal use of alcohol. Alcohol is the first drug choice by the nation’s youth; which could often lead to consequences. The legal drinking age should stay at twenty-one because it betters brain development and lessens violent assaults.

In recent discussions of the drinking age limit, people have always said that the drinking age limit should be lowered. Some may argue that alcohol is not bad and that it can actually be beneficially. Many people would want the drinking age limit to be lowered so that it is legal for young adults to drink. If the drinking age limit were to be lowered there would be a drastic difference in society. In my perspective I will argue that the drinking age limit should not be lowered.

Most people would concur that alcohol should not be given to teenagers. Despite the fact that we concede to this essential truth, underage drinking is still a noteworthy issue in our nation. Since adolescents need development and information with regards to liquor, they put themselves, as well as others in incredible danger when they decide to consume. Regardless of the risk, there are individuals out there who believe that the drinking age should be lowered.

Realistically, teenagers are going to drink no matter what. The minimum drinking age debate in America seems to primarily revolve around one issue: drunk driving. The increased minimum drinking age does not solve the problem of drunk driving in any real way, it just shifts drunk driving deaths into a slightly older age group. Additionally, because teenagers are afraid of getting caught drinking, many end up drinking large amounts of alcohol in short

During World War two, there was limited amount of troops due to the age requirements while drafting. Because of this, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, president of the United States at the time, approved of lowering the drafting age from twenty one to eighteen years old. This strengthened the United States’ troops, but at the same time, it formed a gateway for more issues to be discussed in the future. At the time of World War two, not only was the drafting age twenty one, but you had to be twenty one to vote, and also, setting the drinking age was a state power. Because of this soldiers of ages eighteen to twenty began to raise the issue of being able to hold a weapon

The minimum drinking age in all 50 US States should remain at 21. Exceptions do exist on a state-by-state basis for consumption at home under adult supervision, medical necessity, and other reasons. If parents allow their teenagers to consume alcohol, then we are saying that it is acceptable for a 10 year old to drink beer. In 1976, US Supreme Court case Craig v. Boren ruled 7-2 that this age difference violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment (American Medical Association).

The question people ask is would we have fewer problems with the drinking age being lowered to 18 like the European countries? Someone said that they thought European countries have fewer underage drinking problems because their drinking age is 18. Well from what Madd35 says is “Did you know that more than 21,000 lives have been saved with the age being 21. And Studies show that Europe has more underage drunkenness, injury, rape, and school problems due to alcohol”. (1) Another question

The minimum age limit has been a topic of debate for years even though the choice is simple. Did you know that most parents living in Kansas nowadays grew up in a time in Kansas when they could drink a little alcohol when they were only 18 years old? Many people believe that if we allow drinking at younger ages such as 18 or 19 it would get rid of the “forbidden fruit” effect on alcohol. This is a way of thinking for fools about the problem of legal age of alcohol consumption. The reasons why we shouldn’t change the drinking age to 18 are it damages brain development and it causes more social problems. This problem came about soon after the Prohibition on alcohol was repealed in 1933, it was left up to the state to decide what

Drinking alcohol is a privilege. Many people abuse it, but that doesn’t mean we should get rid of it because that's unfair to the people that won’t abuse that opportunity. My brother graduated high school and is going to college, he’s 19 and he is in the United States Marine Corps, but it is illegal for him to consume alcohol. He’s considered an adult because he’s not in high school and he can get a tattoo if he pleases. He fights for his rights so shouldn’t he have some alcohol. I have a very strong belief that if you are 18 and you are considered an adult so shouldn’t we all be given the same rights?

The drinking age should be decreased from 19 to 18. Firstly, at 18 you are considered an adult; therefore, you are responsible for your own decision making. Secondly, people that are 18 drink anyways, whether its legal or not. Therefore, I think there would be less trouble with police activity and underage drinking fines. Next, if at 18 you were able to buy alcohol, I feel lots of young adults would and it would increase the tax dollars. In conclusion, I think lowering the age to 18 would be a good decision for our province.

POP TSSST. You feel the cold beer against your lips on a hot summer day. But no you cannot. You can go fight for you country. You can smoke a cigarette. You can vote. You can do so many things but you cannot sit, relax, and take a drink.“Alcohol is a drink that contains a substantial amount of ethanol (informally called alcohol), a depressant which in low doses causes euphoria, reduced anxiety, and sociability(...), ”(Wikipedia). However, you have to be 21 to consume it. Even though “Approximately 40 million American adults ages 18 and older, or about 18.1 percent of people in this age group in a given year, have an anxiety disorder” (http://www. thekimfoundation.org/ )..Likewise, the United States drinking age should be 18 because you are seen as an adult, you can legally smoke, and can die for your county.

The United States’ minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) of twenty one is almost a perfect example of a policy with unrealistic expectations and serious unintended consequences. The current policy that the United States has in effect criminalizes youth who consume alcohol at less than twenty one years of age. Young adults are going to drink under twenty one, so why shouldn’t the United States lower the MLDA to eighteen? Following Prohibition in 1933, many states made their MLDA twenty one. During the 1960’s and 1970’s, many states lowered it to eighteen to match the drafting age (Alcohol Policy MD). President Reagan passed The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 which required all states to raise their minimum purchase and public

Do you know of anyone who has had an alcohol related death. There are so many deaths in the U.S alone that have been caused by alcohol. Alcohol is a go to drink now a days. Alcohol has been traced back to around 12,000 years. The MLDA didn’t always used to be set at 21. In the late 60s states began to lower their MLDA, although this resulted in many deaths alcohol related. President Reagan signed off a law saying that the MLDA (Minimum legal drinking age) must be at 21. This was proven to be safer and reduced number of alcohol related deaths.

Ever since its creation in ancient times, alcohol has been used for many reasons and purposes. Since then, controversies have risen on the topic of alcohol consumption and production. Among these controversies is that of the legal drinking age. While that age is 21 years, the legal age for smoking and for holding political posts is 18 years, and the legal age for consent for sex is 16 years – two of which are activities that are equally, if not more, detrimental to one’s health than consuming alcohol. Because the legal ages for the latter three activities and drinking are discrepant, and because many people who are under the age of 21 years drink despite its illegality, the legal age should be lowered accordingly.

The topic of drinking alcohol around young people has been taboo among parents, usually because of aversion to their children consuming alcohol altogether. Though arguments against lowering the minimum drinking age are valid, I’d like to present reasons as to why a lower drinking age would be beneficial overall.