Why The Electoral College Should Not Be Preserved

Most states are always republican or democratic in the way they vote. So the amount of votes is already in favor of one candidate or another before voting actually arrives.(Document 7). Since the candidates are always insured a certain number of votes, the candidates only have to worry about “swing states” or states that change their decisions every election. Since the non-swing states never decide in favor of one candidate or the other by themselves the power to elect a new president resides with whom the citizens of swing states vote for. Without an electoral college, each citizen's vote would be worth more and everyone could help determine a new president instead of the select few who are living in “swing states.” All of these reasons help to make it clear that the electoral college is a corrupt

Your vote should mainly matter! Yes, the electoral college should be abolished. The delegates did not believe the president should be chosen by a direct population vote (of the people). They didn’t trust voters would have enough information to make a good choice. The Electoral College is where the president and vice president are chosen indirectly. This system is where all states and the District of Columbia get one electoral vote for each of their US senators and representatives. Also, each state has a slate of electors for each presidential candidate. Another way this system works is by winner-take all method. The winner-take all method is where whichever candidate wins the most votes in the state, wins the state electoral votes. Lastly a candidate must receive a majority (one more than a half) of the electoral votes to be declared president. That is how everything goes in the electoral college. The electoral college should be abolished because 12 states and D.C. total have double the amount of electoral votes but less people than Illinois. Also, the winner of the 1876 presidential election isn’t what people wanted, it was based on the number of electoral votes. Another reason the electoral college should be abolished is that the states with the same representatives dont have the same number of voters. All these issues that continue to happen, need to be resolved by getting rid of this system.

In the debate about whether or not we should abolish the electoral college, my concern, as well as so many others, is not on the small/big states or Democrat/Republican states, it is about what the people want. More importantly, it is about equality in every vote cast in a presidential election. With the current system in place, it is impossible for this to be achieved. The electoral college should be abolished because of the unfair distribution of electors per state and coverage of states in the presidential run, refusal to give the people what they want, and because it is no longer relevant or needed.

The Electoral College is a system that creates a compromise between the election of the president by a vote in congress and a popular vote from the citizens of the U.S. This results in a total of 538 electors from congress and to win the presidential election you must have over 270 Electoral votes. There is people who do not like the electoral college because the system is old fashioned and not democratic according to the two articles In Defense of the Electoral College by Richard A. Posner and Time to End the Electoral College by The New York Times. There is people who do agree with the Electoral College process. The Electoral College should not be abolished because the system gives an opportunity to political parties to express themselves in the American government, gives small states a chance in the elections, and the system is determined by the constitution. If presidential candidate does not get over 270 votes then the House of Representatives decides with votes from the top three other presidential candidates with the most electoral votes and same goes for vice presidential election except Senate decides with only top two.

The electoral college should be abolished because candidates can win with very minimal popular vote, electoral college votes are not evenly distributed throughout the states, and many states are ignored by the candidates.

Is it possible that the heart of the election process hurt the principles of democracy more than it helps? The Electoral College has existed since the time of the Founding Fathers leading many to believe it is a crucial aspect of the election process meant to protect the ideals of democracy. In truth, this system has largely hindered the possibility of a representative government. Thus, the Electoral College is archaic and anti-democratic, supporting unfair election practices such as underrepresentation and must be abolished.

Even though the Electoral college worked in the past it isn’t working for the present. The Electoral College was created to help elect a president. How that works is the 50 states are assigned so many voting representatives depending on population in that state. This worked in the past due to most states population was equal but in present times its not so some states have more of a say so in electing the president of The United States. Even though the Electoral College worked in the past, it needs to be change for the present and these reasons are; it gives bigger states more votes and is unfair to smaller states (Clayton)

It all starts with the winner-take-all system set up in all but two states (“Electoral College”). This system creates deep red and deep blue states. These states are ones that one party almost always win (“Electoral College”). For example the Republican party usually wins Texas and the Democratic party usually wins California. For people that support the minority party in these states, their vote feels unimportant. Since they know that the state will most likely not go to the party they support they do not feel motivated to go and vote. This is why America has one the lowest voter turnouts of developed nations (Wattenburg). Supporters of the Electoral College say, despite the low voter turnout, it forces candidates to appeal to a wide variety of people. This is false, candidates know the states they have secured and what states are up for grabs. These up-for-grab states are known as swing states, and this where all the candidates time and money is spent. There are only twelve swing states which means that these twelve states basically determine the election, the biggest ones being Florida and Ohio (Cole). According to Adam Cole $38.9 million was spent on ads in Florida and an additional $28.3 million spent in Ohio. All this money is spent for the one reason all the electoral votes from these states go to the winning party in the state (Cole). Along with swing states being too important and the

To begin with the electoral college should be abolished because it is undemocratic. In the chart by George C. Edwards the comparison of population and electoral votes with other states do not add up correctly.(Doc D). This shows how the electoral college is unfair because not all of the states are represented equally. The data shows how the candidates that won the popular

Every state gets one electoral vote based on the number of members in the House of Representatives and two extra points for its two senators. This system allows a candidate to not get enough popular votes but get enough electoral votes and still win the election as shown by the Presidential Election of 2000. If a popular vote was enacted, the process would be more democratic. The Electoral College also manipulates presidential campaigns. For example let’s take a Republican named X. Assume that Minnesota, Maine, and Nebraska tend to vote for Republicans. Mr. X will not spend much time campaigning in those states but will focus his efforts on swing states. Mr. X will visit those states more and spend more money campaigning there. To gather votes, Mr. X will disproportionately focus on important issues in that state. To carry Florida, Mr. X will have to earn the support of senior citizens, Latinos, farmers that grow citrus crops, and other influential bodies of

The founding fathers created the Electoral College as a compromise for the Constitutional Convention. Since the delegates could not agree on a solution for the problem of creating a system to elect the President, it was given to the Committee of Eleven on Postponed Matters. Ultimately, that committee decided to create the Electoral College. The first system consisted of electors which each had two votes for president. Whoever obtained the most votes would become president, and the person who received the second most amount of votes In order to compromise for the best solution possible, they added a limitation that electors could not cast votes for two candidates from their own state.They justified this restriction for three reasons. One reason the committee chose to use the Electoral College was the electorate system promotes federalism or a system of government where the individual states share power with the central state. One example of a federalist system is the United States. The United States’s central government sets laws for the whole country, but each individual state can make their own

The Electoral College is a process, not a place of schooling. The Electoral College is responsible for electing who will be our next president of the United States by compromising between electing the president by vote and electing the president by popular vote of qualified citizens. The electoral College should be abolished because it is an unfair and unnecessary way to choose the president. Each candidate earns points by winning individual states. Each state is worth a different amount of points based on population, added with the number of senators. There are 538 electors within the college. People are finding it a challenge to decide if the Electoral College should be changed or abolished. If it were up to me, it would be abolished, because if the president wins the popular vote, they get the majority of the citizens votes. This system is unfair because each state has a different number population, so each has a different amount of points. When I am eligible to vote, I want to be able to vote for who I want, the majority of my state’s population should not be able to decide. The Electoral College may be

The United States Constitution Twelfth Amendment, Article II, speaks that“each States shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.” The total number of electoral college in the country is 538. This includes the number of representative which is 435, plus 100 the number of senators; since the country has 50 states, each State received equal amount of senators which is 2 but the number of representative are best on the population live in that State. The extra 3 is for the district of columbia, which is washington D.C. In order to be a president, someone must have 270 electoral votes. This simple means that the tuesday after the first monday in November every four years, people do not votes for the president but they vote for electors who will votes for the president the Monday after the second Wednesday in December of the same year. Different time in history the presents has won the popular votes but because of the electoral college they end up lose the election. As one can see, this is a serious dilemma that need a change in the constitution. Although this plan seems like a good plan because it has been used in the country for many years; however it has weaknesses that has affect the U.S presidential votes more than one time in the history.

YES! I do believe that the electoral college should be eliminated. I think that this should happen because it makes some peoples voes greater impacting than others which aren't fair. the electoral college is in a nutshell 538 votes that determine who wins the presidency. split evenly across the population about 309,000,000. Every 574,000 people would be represented by 1 electoral vote but the electoral college does give votes to people only states. which is unfair in many ways such as, Ohio with the population of 11.5 million it should get 20 votes but no the electoral college only gives them 18 the other 2 votes go to other states that should only deserve 1 or 2 but get 4. and several other states are missing votes that they should get.

The electoral college should be abolished because it clearly makes no sense that a presidential candidate can win the popular vote and end up losing the presidency, it's not as democratic as it used to be , and let us not forgot about the 3rd party candidates that you never hear of as often as they should be. There are many unanswered questions about this topic and why this is seen as undemocratic to critics.