Why The Financial Crisis Was A Specific Law Case Involving Lehman Brothers

Introduction The collapse of Lehman Brothers, a sprawling global bank, in September 2008 almost brought down the world’s financial system. Considered by many economists to have been the worst financial crisis since the Great depression of the 1930s. Economist Peter Morici coined the term the “The Great Recession” to describe the period. While the causes are still being debated, many ramifications are clear and include the failure of major corporations, large declines in asset values (some estimates put the drop in the trillions of dollars range), substantial government intervention across the globe, and a significant decline in economic activity. Both regulatory and market based solutions have been proposed or executed to attempt to combat the causes and effects of the crisis.

Additionally, when America’s economy was melting in 2008, the Federal Reserve played a big role to stabilize it. Besides the Great Depression during the years 1929 through 1939 the worst economic time for the United States, 2008 was unmistakable one of the worst years of America’s economy history. When this economic recession was taking place, the Fed had to take action to avoid another depression and to stop a fall from the financial system. With the help of the Federal Reserve J.P. Morgan Chase and Co.’s they planned to help Bear Stearns (an investment bank) with financial assistance to help the government to buyout AIG, a well-known insurance company. This helped to produce a strategy targeting to stabilize the credit market and also the short-term interest rate from 45% to almost 0 from the benchmark (Coste). Thanks to the Federal Reserve and their well design plan to avoid another recession they prevented the economy of the world or better known as Macroeconomic system from falling and getting it

I. Introduction In 2008 America’s financial system was brought to a stand still as decades of negligence and financial decisions caused our economy to sink into the worst recession since the great depression. Cultivating a problem worse than America has seen in roughly a century points one finger not at a particular cause, but a string of events that finally gave way. Now, eight years later our economy is still recovering, and time has allowed us to look back at decades of mistakes to try and connect the dots of the perfect storm that collapsed our financial market in 2008. In 2009 Brookings Institution, one of Washington’s oldest think tanks, concluded there were three causes that resulted in the crisis. Economists Martin Baily and Douglas Elliot stated that the results of government intervention in the housing market, the influences Wall Street had on Washington, and global economic forces were the three main causes of the economic collapse. They believed that a housing bubble inflated when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two government-sponsored enterprises, intervened in the housing market. The banking industry was called out to be blamed for years of manipulation of our political and financial systems. Lastly, Baily and Elliot cite the global economy and the existence of a credit boom throughout European and Asian nations. Low inflation and consistent growth throughout the world economy spiked investors’ interest in acquiring riskier investments, which encouraged

Bear Stearns Bailout “The Fed did not bailout Bear at taxpayer expense, but enabled – as it is mandated – the financial markets to continue to function. History will call the Fed’s action the right move at the right time”, says Jeremy Siegel, Ph.D. The Bear Stearns Company began a financial meltdown in July 2007. By March 2008, it was ready to file Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Some people believe that the Federal Reserve should not have stepped in to bailout Bear Stearns because it was rewarding reckless business behavior and Bear should have been left to file bankruptcy. The deal of Bear Stearns was not a government bailout; it was rather a loan to preserve jobs, homes, savings, the economy, the shareholders of Bear, and the financial

During the spring of 2008, rumors were circulating that the investment bank Bear Stearns would fail due to their massive investments in subprime mortgages, or “toxic assets.” These rumors were able to decline the companyʻs stock from $171 to $57 dollars a share, and bankruptcy was imminent. Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, realized that Bear Stearns could not be allowed to go bankrupt because they were deeply connected to many other firms, which would result in major economic failure. In response to the crisis, Bernanke lent money to JP Morgan, which then lent the money to Bear Stearns, as the Federal Reserve could not directly lend money to Bear Stearns as it is an unregulated investment bank. After this process, Henry Paulson, the Treasury Secretary, relied on the principle of moral hazard and notified the other banks that

In 2008 the world faced the worst financial crisis since the great depression. Many banks closed their doors for good that year. Among them were both small and large banks. One specific bank that collapsed that year was IndyMac, one of the largest banks in the United States. IndyMac marked the largest collapse of a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured institution since 1984, when Continental Illinois, which had $40 billion in assets, failed, according to FDIC records (“The Fall of IndyMac 2008). This paper will talk about the cause of the collapse of IndyMac in 2008, the handling of the issues, as well as the aftermath of the collapse.

In late 2007, America was hit with the most significant blow to its finance sector since the Great Depression. Upon careful retrospection of the nations economic policy since the Great Depression, many discovered that slowly but surely, America had been setting itself up for the “perfect storm” all along. Without question, it was evident that due to deregulation, excessive accumulation of debt (especially in the form of over leveraging), greed, treacherous decision-making, and obscure practices between financial institutions, America’s economy was brought to a screeching halt. While facing the impending failure of the country’s powerhouse banks, the federal government was forced to intervene, saving some banks, while merging or leading others to their demise. Additionally, the United States Department of Treasury was faced with rectifying the lack of credit available to fuel commerce, both business and personal. After jump-starting the nations cash flow with government assistance packages, the government introduced reform to oversee and limit corporations that are deemed “too big to fail” hoping to ensure that no such economic downturn should arise in the future.

The Dodd-Frank Regulatory Reform Act is one of the most influential regulations in response to the financial crisis. This acts primary focus is to prevent future financial system collapses, by reducing excessive risk taking by financial institutions and by protecting the consumers (Rose & Hudgins, 2013). In addition, the Dodd- Frank Act gives the Federal Reserve the authority to monitor financial institutions and gives them the power to restructure or liquidate firms that are financially inadequate (Investopedia, 2010). Fortunately, since the 2008 financial crisis a number of new regulations have been enacted, the Dodd-Frank Act is the most monumental new regulation, because it seeks to prevent future bank bailouts and the risky behaviors of financial institutions. While these regulations may not be enough to fully prevent another financial crisis, the necessary steps have been taken to minimize the disastrous effects of overt risk taking by financial

On Monday, March 10, the rumour started: Bear Stearns was having liquidity problems. In fact, the maverick investment bank had around $18 billion in cash reserves. But soon the speculation created its own reality, and the race was on to keep Bear’s crisis from destroying Wall Street. In what the economists called a “credit crisis,” the big banks were so spooked they had all but stopped lending money, a nervous Fed, in what some believe was the greatest financial scandal in

The 2008 financial crisis brought panic and fear to the nation as the stock market plunged, reducing the wealth of millions of Americans. The housing market crash put nearly all the major financial institutions in grave danger of insolvency. The government reacted quickly to not only stop the bleeding and

In 2008, the financial industry dominated the market. Bankers were giving themselves hefty bonuses with which they purchased yachts, vacation homes, jets, cars, etc. “Finance is supposed to be a service industry, an aid to the business of genuine wealth creation,” says Sean Corrigan, who oversees more

Lehman Brothers On September 10, 2008, Lehman Brothers announced the lowest decline as the shares dropped to 45%. It left the market value at $5.4 billion after the Korea Development Bank rejected to make an investment deal that could rescue Lehman. The company would seek capital from other investors in order to recover their financial situation. These efforts faltered and the situation grew more severe, even after the US government had already saved the Bear Stearns and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Though it is less likely that the US government will keep Lehman's bailout, there should be a resolution from the Federal Reserve System to bolster Lehman’s finance so as to prevent the US economic declination.

One of the first banks to show that there was a financial problem besides the subprime loan industry was Bear Stearns. One of the United States largest investment banks would declare for bankruptcy because 2 of their hedge funds lost almost all of its investor capital. They attempted to use money from other operations to try to save the company but the loss from the other 2 hedge funds was too large (NPR, 2011). Other banks soon followed and caused the central banks coordinate to inject liquidity into credit markets for the first time since 9/11. To show this crisis went global, the U.S. Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Banks of Australia, Canada, and Japan all injected money. The countries largest mortgage lender reported that foreclosures and mortgage delinquencies, which meant that barrower has not paid back the lender, have risen to

Chapter 2. Background 2.1 Introduction This chapter is about the background of 2007-2008 financial crisis. The 2007-2008 financial crisis has a huge impact on US banking system and how the banks operate and how they are regulated after the financial turmoil. This financial crisis started with difficulty of rolling over asset backed

Should Lehman Brothers Investment Bank Have Been Allowed to Fail? Name: Ran Linyan Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Corporate profile of Lehman Brothers Bank 3 2.1 Corporate Profile and Business 4 2.1.1 History of Lehman Brothers 4 2.1.2 Lehman Brothers Investment Bank 4 2.2 Forces of Change and Competition in Lehman Brothers 4 2.2.1 Change in Lehman Brother’s Business Strategy 4 2.2.2 Financial Competiveness in Lehman Brothers 5 2.3 Financial System and Bank Management Attitudes 5 2.3.1 Deregulation of United States Financial System 5 2.3.2 Bank’s Lending Policies 6 2.3.3 Bank’s Risk Management Attitude 6 3 Causes of Lehman Brothers Bank Failure 6 3.1. Before the firm became bankrupt, they had more than $275 billion in assets under management. Furthermore, since the time the bank went public in 1994, the firm had increased net revenues over 600% from $2.73 billion to $19.2 billion and increased its employee headcount over 230% from 8,500 to almost 28,600 (Demyanyk, Y. S. and Hemert, O. V. 2008).