First and foremost, if students have to come back from school later in the day then the after school activities will be shortened. Their sport practices will be shortened and they won’t have time work on any work in
Truancy can occur among students if an open campus is accepted. If students have the privilege to leave school for fifty whole minutes on their own, then they have the freedom to not come back. It would break the trust between students and educators, and harsher rules would have to be enforced on the open campus rule. Numerous students who decide to ditch the remaining periods would
Some may argue that we should introduce this new system into all of our schools. While there is a slight chance that using this new method in our school system may benefit us, there would be many shortcomings that would outweigh the good things about it. Although I believe that we should be persistent with our current system, there are minimal changes that could be made to enhance it. Any of the alterations that could be done to improve our system would be minor,
Education is very important. Students being able to concentrate and focus in school is very important. The problem is that we can’t meet everyone’s satisfaction. Dress code, SOL testing, and many other things are issues. One such issue is class scheduling. I believe 4x4 scheduling would be a better option for everyone.
Many people believe that the cost of disrupting the current way things work would be expensive and cause confusion. It’s hard to get people and systems to change, especially when people are accustomed to things operating a certain way. But those who are against the idea might want to reconsider, especially if they are budget-conscious. Since school attendance and federal dollars are linked together, it's in our school's best interest to keep attendance up or even improve it. Later start times increased attendance by 15% at a district in Ohio. In Los Angeles experts predict increasing attendance by just 1% would save around $40
All children need a routine and a loving family home. Without these there may be conflict at their school because they do not know or
students not having to wear uniforms has its benefits. Parents would not have to go out every few
In addition, the cons for this is that the students in the school could have maybe problems are even personal problems in this day and woman could have their personal belongs. Students could get there belongs took on accident, maybe chargers stole after inspection if they forgot to lock it.
Thats what i have to say about the school rules that they need to change the rules to make then student want to
What does school mean to you? Is it about what you learn or what you do? School is getting distracted more and more every year because of the occasions that are being made. The problems with events that have no educational value have a negative impact on Woodlynde. The events such as non-academic field trips, concerts and dodgeball tournaments eliminate the time we could use to learn. They are pointless and not a part of learning for the future. I believe Dr. Fulco and Mr. Shank should replace the non -academic events with actual learning events that teach the students. They can also change the calendar of school. Academics will actually teach the students and prepare them not just for the future, but also what every students wants to achieve.
So, I took some time and researched some of late policies from Cy-Fair middle schools. If we move forward with this policy, it would hold stronger consequences than other schools.
I know it would be beneficial for students to stay in the classroom to continue to learn but should have the opportunity to complete their discipline on school grounds so they are not forced to misbehave in the community. Having them complete task such as helping a teacher clean up the classroom, or be involved with school projects allows that student to know that misbehavior is unacceptable but also shows that the school still cares about the student by keeping them on school grounds.
Students wouldn't be late for class if they had the time to get ready, sleep longer, and eat breakfast. When some students aren't ready, their parent or guardian leaves them behind causing them to either not go to school or be late. There would not be as much skipping school from tiredness and laziness from having to wake up so early, and there would be less zeros in the grade book for late papers. Classes could even do group activities for students being there. Teachers frequently complain about absences, so why not help out with the
Without this part of the system kids could just leave freely without return. The sign in part of the off campus lunch system will most likely aid in the assistance of this problem. When a student who meets the requirements wishes to leave campus for lunch, they must first sign out in the office on a designated sign out sheet. When the student returns, they will again sign in but this time on a sign in sheet rather than a sign out. Whichever teacher is in charge of the kids leaving will check who has left and who has returned. For students who do not return, will be counted as skipping and will deal with the punishment the administrator sees
In this case there is only one teacher and about 30 students. Parents also have to worry about the safety of their child in a public school. Parents have no accountability for their child's actions. Not even voluntarily. Too often a child will get into trouble for something at school with a teacher, get seriously injured, or be getting into a fight with another peer, and the only thing the parents want to know is, "Where the teacher was and what were they doing?"