Why The Human Resource Department Is Responsible For New Employee Orientations

Performance appraisal is an important issue in human resource management and has a significant effect in the performance of an organisation. It is the system of evaluating the performance of employees regarding the accomplishment of their responsibilities and determining their potential to grow and develop. Bias in the evaluation process can affect the accuracy and appropriateness of the performance appraisal. Bias is a serious issue because it affects the ability to make appropriate decisions about the promotion of employees. A performance appraisal system that works to the disadvantage of members of a group can also pose legal issues.

An appraisal is one of the most commonly used methods of formal assessment and is used to evaluate and assess the performance of an employee against agreed targets and objectives, with the aim of improving employee performance. Where an employee has been able to achieve their targets, the appraisal can be used to recognise successes. This often helps to increase an employee’s confidence and motivation and can lead to better organisational performance. Many organisations will use the outcomes of an appraisal to identify potential candidates for promotions or even an increase in pay. At the same time, an appraisal meeting may include discussions on underperformance, identifying why this has occurred and how this can be avoided in the future.

Performance appraisal is a method which is increasingly used to evaluate employees to determine the degree to which they are performing effectively and encourage them to direct their energies towards organizational performance. Although the appraisal is being practiced, there are criticisms made against the system which generally arise from within the Orthodox and radical management frame work.

Although performance cannot be judge alone with 360-degree assessment, it provides a commentary aspect that will assist an organization in Leadership Development and Succession Planning. Including the 360-degree appraisal in the performance management process will provide a broader perspective about an employee’s performance and detail to annual appraisal. In addition, the technique facilitates greater self-development for an employee. Moreover, it enables an employee to compare his or her self- evaluation about performance with the perceptions of others.

Formal employee appraisals provide a strong reinforcement of the corporate aims and values. It gives managers an opportunity to show employees how their individual roles contribute to the company goals and give feedback to the impact that the employee has on those goals. It also provides management with a solid forum for

Generally, any successful organization has numerous factors behind their success. But among them employees are the most vital factor and have a huge impact on the performance of the organization. Any organization can achieve their objectives with ease if the human resources play an instrumental role in achieving the intention of the organizations. So, it is the objective of the organization to measure accurately the performance of the members and optimize them as a vital resource. Therefore, an appraisal is an important factor which has an incredible motivational impact on the people.

Development of a performance appraisal system that is effective in a human service organization is of benefit for the organization and the employees. For a performance appraisal system to be effective, the system has to be strategic, designed to fit the specific needs of the organization, non-discriminatory, non-bias, with correct implementation and administration. Many different components, must to be incorporated to make this type of system beneficial for all who use it, and all who are evaluated by the system.

A commanding performance evaluation is obtained from several different resources. A proper evaluation is not issued only from management but also with input from peers and subordinates. It is also not uncommon to have customers; both internal and external contribute to the appraisal process. Self-appraisal is also an effective tool for appraisal as it can assist with establishing goals for the future. This type of 360º degree appraisal process can provide a complete assessment of the employee’s strengths and weaknesses. Often times, this type of appraisal process can assist to identify area of concern that traditionally would not have been recorded. All evaluations should be recognized for their source. A self evaluation may be slightly biased and not overly critical where an appraisal from a peer could be affected by the employee’s willingness to properly cooperate with the process. The self evaluation has a tendency not to be objective in relation to the requirements of the position. An affective self evaluation must be based on the requirements of the position and not based on the judgment of the individual performing the activity.

Managers are charged with making judgments about their employee’s performance and capabilities. Employees should have a formal evaluation process and should receive regular informal updates from their managers on the job. Performance Evaluations should include basic information regarding the employee, job objectives, job competencies, employee contributions and developmental goals and needs. A performance evaluation should also include an opportunity for management to focus on positive contributions the employee has made, areas that need development, and space for the employee to respond to the appraisal. Setting performance expectations, gathering outcomes from the year and comparing them will help determine whether they are satisfied or whether new initiatives are taken (Andersen, 2016). The

“Performance appraisals can enhance employee performance as well as advance the mission and goals of an organization. There are many advantages of performance appraisals if they are applied fairly, consistently and objectively. Performance appraisals not applied fairly can be counterproductive and even destructive to

Annual performance reviews are not an effective form of performance management system to measure the employee’s performance because they can be biased, waste of managerial time, too sporadic to make a lasting impact, and can affect the employee’s behavior. All companies strive to be successful at meeting their company goals in a time efficient manner. As time goes on, companies are realizing the key to a successful business is happy employees. Companies must experiment with new methods to find the right process of evaluating employee performance and ensuring that success continues. Many companies use performance appraisals to relay information to the employees about their performance level within the company. Annual performance appraisals are so prevalent that 72% of companies use them to measure employee performance (Fawcett). Though the success of the review to motivate and improve employee performance, greatly depends on how well the manager executes the appraisal. Performance appraisals are important to companies but, the question of at what cost to the employee should it continue still continues to linger.

Never a fan of organized yearly appraisals, employee evaluations should foster improving communication and collaborative teamwork to encourage innovation and

Performance appraisals, popularized during the Industrial Revolution, are conducted widely throughout the business world (Williams, 2014). This process evaluates the performance of an employee in their respective positions (Lussier & Hendon, n.d.)- it provides feedback on how well they have done and where they have fallen short, in addition to setting performance goals for the upcoming assessment period. There are many benefits to annual performance appraisals to include identifying training needs/opportunities, charting an employee’s progress in goal attainment, relationship building between managers and employees and motivating employees to excel in their duties and obligations (Webb, n.d.). Despite their widespread usage, some opponents believe that annual performance appraisals are antiquated and no longer effective in today’s fast-paced business world (Scullen, 2011). This paper sets out to review and discuss the opinions of one such opponent as well as discuss my theory on annual performance appraisals.

This suggests that performance appraisal is a dominant tool to evaluate, assess, develop and compensate the performance of employee/subordinate helping to create goal congruence between the organization and it employees.

According to Wanna, et al (1992), the objective of staff appraisal is to improve planning and service delivery at the general level and also to provide feedback to individual officers. Thus performance appraisal provides information to help manage employees in such a way that employee performance improves (Denisi and Robert, 2006). The ultimate goal of most performance appraisal systems is to increase employee motivation and productivity