preview

Why The United States Should Fund NASA

Better Essays
Open Document

President John F. Kennedy, in an address to Congress in 1961, said “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth” (“Excerpt from an Address”). He inspired people to push the limits of what was possible, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) finally completed his challenge eight years later. The financial burden of such space programs was balanced by an intense desire to learn and discover, which led to advancements across all areas of life. Today, in a time of federal financial struggles, some are calling for an end to NASA’s expensive programs. However, the United States should continue to fund them …show more content…

The Office of Management and Budget, which outlines the White House’s plans for economic success, maintains that it “look[s] to scientific innovation to promote sustainable economic growth” (Zients and Holdren 1). NASA contributes to this notion by spending its budget on investments in and collaboration with other scientific institutions. It plays a part in each of the nine areas of science and technology (e.g. clean energy and advanced manufacturing) outlined in the Office of Management and Budget’s plan for economic prosperity (“NASA Socio-Economic Impacts” 9). Moreover, NASA participates in the development of 14 different technology types, from launch propulsion systems to nanotechnology (4). These involvements by NASA stimulate the economy in several ways. The administration encourages prosperity and innovativeness in other companies by contributing funds to their efforts. This, in turn, spurs competition in the technology marketplace, as more companies want to participate in NASA’s endeavors. Also, NASA’s participation in energy research guides the United States towards energy independence, which promotes a stable economy. This shows that the federal government’s funding of NASA is justified because the administration’s contributions to society and the economy are more valuable than the 0.5% of the federal budget that it …show more content…

Currently, an estimated half a million people in the United States have a job description that relates to space, and NASA is “the strongest power that provides jobs in the space industry” (Machay 128-9). Each of those citizens contributes their knowledge and money to the national economy. NASA also promotes job growth: “Giving $1 billion to NASA can create some 24,000 jobs via contracts to the private sector” (128). Those potential employees would provide diversity and experience that could only advance the country. Thus, removing NASA funding would potentially leave thousands unemployed, halt the growth of hundreds of jobs per year, and subsequently encumber the economy. It is nonsensical to damage the nation in this way in exchange for a small percentage of the federal budget, when NASA clearly has such as positive

Get Access