Why Ukip Are Bad

Multiculturalism, according to Tariq Modood, is the "recognition of group difference within the public sphere of laws, policies, democratic discourses and the terms of a shared citizenship and national identity" (Modood 2). On the surface, this would appear to be a good and healthy thing: ethnicities are encouraged to retain their respective cultural identities and retain the customs that are their heritage. And yet there is something devious about the idea: it sees in terms of "groups." The idea is like a pie: each culture is given a slice in the much larger pie that is the nation. You may enjoy

The Author Marable defines “multiculturalism” as “the recognition that our nation’s cultural heritage that does not begin and end with the intellectual and aesthetic products of Western Europe, rather multiculturalism rejects the model of cultural assimilation and social conformity.” However, Multiculturalism is often been misinterpreted, Marable according to him said that, the “melting pot” never existed.

In the essay, “No Place like home” by Neil Bissondath argues that although multiculturalism has emphasized differences it has also created a divide. Canada is seen to have a record of racism, that shows an ongoing separation in Quebec. This would also include sexism, and various forms of discrimination that are tied in with racism. Till today, people are discriminated on their physical appearance. As multiculturalism grows in Canada racism becomes to be a problem to some. Bissondath goes on to say that although there is a damage of multiculturalism, many Canadians need to, “pursue acceptance of others-not mere tolerance of them” (Bissondath, Page 307). What is meant to be said by that quote is, Canadians need to learn to accept other’s rather than parting ways due to someone’s color, race, or their appearance. However, Will Kymlicka says in his essay, the more multiculturalism the better. Kymlicka says that immigrants are supportive and that they have

Multiculturalism is a political process whereby the government uses it to create peace between its people, but really it undermines much of what is valuable about diversity. When we talk about diversity, what we mean is that the world is a messy place, full of clashes and

Multiculturalism has played a significant role in Canada, since its establishment 40 years ago. Much of Canadian society is reflective of different cultures from around the world making multiculturalism a very relevant topic to Canadians. While it can be argued that the majority of Canadians are in favor of multiculturalism, there are some who hold a different opinion. Though some critics claim that multiculturalism promotes a form of ‘hyphenated Canadianism’ that exacerbates divisions in Canadian society based on such characteristics like ethnic, minority, or immigrant status, the social advantages such as how multiculturalism is a source of

Canada is routinely defined as the exemplar multicultural society with the most diverse cities in the world such as Vancouver, Toronto and Quebec. The concepts of integrity and complexity are being shaped in Canadian society because of its co-existence of different cultures. Indeed, multiculturalism has been a keystone of Canadian policy for over 40 years with the aim of pursuing Canadian unity (Flegel 2002). Accordingly, Canada is generally estimated a country where people are all equal and where they can share fundamental values based upon freedom. Diversity is sustained and promoted by governmental policy, however, there are still racist interactions, which are destructive to minorities integration, especially recent ethnic groups’ arrival (Banting & Kymlicka 2010). This paper will examine challenges that multiculturalism has brought society and residents of Canada.

With diminishing control of what happens in Britain, the British people decided it was best to vacate the union. The British were dealing with the laws given by the European members who were not living and experiencing the country themselves. To provide an example of a ghastly law given to the British people, they, as part of the European Union, were only allowed to catch 20% of the fish swimming in British territorial waters. What this meant was that tens of thousands of jobs were lost and they were not able to use one of the most significant resources given to them, as Britain is surrounded by ocean. Nigel Farage, Leader of the UK Independence Party, says that his fellow Englishmen, “effectively gave away the ability to look after one of our greatest resources to a bureaucracy based in Brussels.” Because of the way the government was set up, “Not only could the voters not change anything, but the institutes themselves are incapable of reform.” With an already maimed government, the European Union was creating more problems than it was solving. The British people had enough of giving up their rights as British citizens so the European Commission could tell them how to live. Therefore, with problems like those arising from the Union and with no hope to resolve them, Britain filed for secession and pulled out of the union

This seems to be the case in Australia where research reveals that, despite the relatively tolerant social attitudes concerning multiculturalism and national identity, many Australians are quite suspicious of migrants and tend to exercise negative behaviours (Fozdar, Spittles & Hartley 2015). Indeed, this is especially evident with Middle Eastern migrants coming from largely Islamic countries. In a recent quantitative survey undertaken in 2012, 12 percent of the participants involved reported uncomfortable feelings towards Iraqi immigrants (the highest of any group) (Markus 2014). Therefore, it would seem that nationalism has some life in Australia and it is connected to assimilation. To understand this further, this essay will now move to an examination of Australia’s political history, with a specific focus on the decisions made during the Howard-Coalition era (1996 -

In present day Canada, it has widely become known that multiculturalism is a fact of Canadian life. The numbers back this statement as Statistics Canada shows that nearly 6,264,800 people identified themselves as a member of a visible minority group which, represented 19.1% of the total population. Multiculturalism is defined as “the co-existence of diverse cultures, where culture includes racial, religious, or cultural groups and is manifested in customary behaviours”. With this definition, the crucial points become “co-existence of diverse cultures” and “customary behaviors”. In Canada, the numbers show that there exists a large number of visible minority people, around 6,264,800 to be exact, but the real question becomes does this Canada see multiculturalism the same way as the definition? Furthermore, the real question becomes: do new immigrants need to change or adapt in order to co-exist and “fit in” within the Canadian society/culture? In the shortest possible answer, Yes. Immigrants do need to change and adhere to Canadian customs and norms, and most important of all: Canadian rules and laws. To elaborate, this doesn’t suggest for the immigrants to forget to assimilate and give up their culture, immigrants freely choose their new citizenship because they want to be Canadians 2. This change should be limited to a certain extent. Lastly this change is unlikely to happen without Canadian support. In the past, and even today condescending guidelines and racism has

Where Race Does Not Matter is a book written by Cecil Foster that examines racism in European countries mainly giving attention to Canada (Foster, 2005). Cecil Foster is a professor of sociology in Canada and has been a victim of racism in the 1980’s and 90’s as he narrates his story where his parents left Barbados in search of a better life and became immigrants. The book by Foster has a chronological analysis of the issue of immigrants and racism starting with the policies that were used in the past to the policies and procedures that are used today which he terms in his book as the modern era. The primary purpose that Foster strives to achieve in this book is to publicize by laying facts down, the merits of multiculturalism which he firmly

Therefore, Australian Multiculturalism is a unique, strategic construction of a rhetoric that illustrates the capacity

On the bnp website you say that “the bnp is a patriotic, democratic alternative to the old parties that have wrecked out great country”. You are wrong and this is not the case as the voting of next prime minister is fair as the whole of the uk gets to vote in who they want. People don’t like the path you have chosen to run the people of the uk you do not vote for you. You are saying also

Since 9/11, support for multiculturalism has dropped in many liberal states like Australia and Britain. In many western democracies Muslims are perceived as potential terrorists who carry illiberal practices and are unable to embrace the values and norms of the liberal system. In Britain, multiculturalism was blamed for the atrocities caused by the terrorist attacks of London 2005. More recently the issue of ISIS has created lots of worries in Britain and the country seems to suffer from not only a multiculturalism crisis but also an identity crisis. Prime Minister David Cameron made it clear in his speech in a security conference held in Munich 2011 that the policies of multiculturalism that were applied in the past have created a fragmented

Every society has different views on cultural diversities and the ways in which they should be accepted. Multiculturalism is defined as ‘the embrace of an inclusive, diverse society’ (Malik K., 2015). In the past, multiple countries around the world, particularly those in Europe, have embraced multiculturalism through generally relaxed entry for immigrants. Overtime however, things have changed for these multicultural countries. This is evident through the establishment of multiple multicultural policies by governments in Europe, and the increase in standards for citizenship in countries such as Germany, France and UK. Even in Australia, ‘multiculturalism, Australian identity, immigration and ethnicity are concepts that are frequently and intensely

As the majority of people have different definitions of the word multiculturalism as well as different views on the cultural and political impacts, I will put forward the different views throughout the chosen texts. As stated in the text ‘The successes and failures of multiculturalism’, the author defines the idea of multiculturalism as “the essence of multiculturalism is the idea that, if one makes immigrants feel welcome by allowing them to retain their culture and by seeking to address discrimination against them.” (Manning, A. 2011, page 1) This text argues that the apprehension about multiculturalism is interconnected to the conviction that in the United Kingdom, not all the minority groups that are living here consider themselves to be British, due to their ethnicity. In the table showing the Percentages Reporting a British National Identity by Ethnicity, on the second page of the ‘The successes and failures of multiculturalism’ text written by Alan Manning in 2011, it is shown that each different ethnic minority group have certain percentage of their population living in the United Kingdom that consider themselves to be British nationals, whether they were born in the United Kingdom, or abroad. Though the percentages diverge between each minority group, there are still a large number of people that consider themselves as British Nationals (Manning,