Why Understudies Should Not Be Allowed In College

He makes a strong effort, aimed at creating a sentiment towards government, colleges, and student loans that will solicit change to the system in use today. Whether or not his endeavor worked is still yet to be seen 4 years later, as students today still struggle with the same problem featured in the article: vast amounts of student loan debt. Proposals of “free community college” by former President Obama, and “debt free public college” by Secretary Clinton, but America voted against such ideas. The question lingers whether or not the current administration will take

President Barack Obama is proposing a plan that would allow community colleges to become more accessible for lower income households, who may not have the means to pay for higher forms of education. This issue on whether to focus and divert most of governmental funds to community colleges has sparked a lot of controversy throughout the nation. The United States is known as one of the most influential countries, with the strongest military defenses the world has ever seen. But by pushing for lower tuition prices or even free college tuition it requires a decision that looks at all sides of the spectrum. Powerful men like Nelson Mandela have said, “Education is one of the most powerful weapons which you can use to change the world”; however, education does come with a high price that most Americans are not willing to pay for. Although providing a higher form of education to low income households will increase the number of educated people within our communities; however, it will not compensate for the negative effects on our society.

The article ‘America’s Great Working-Class Colleges’ published in the New York Times looks at the data received from college graduates tax filings and financial-aid records from around the country. Many people believe that colleges that are available to the middle and lower class, and that produce successful graduates is a thing of the past, but the data shown in the article proves that working-class colleges are striving. While these public colleges are filled with students from all types of backgrounds, Ivy League colleges remain to be for students of the elite society. On several campuses of elite colleges, fewer students hail from the entire bottom half of the income distribution than from the top 1 percent (Leonhardt, 2017). With elite colleges being almost exclusively for wealthy Americans, working-class colleges are playing a key role to social

In 1958, the National Defense Education Act provided college students up to one thousand dollars a year in loans, but the average annual loan was actually only five hundred dollars or less because students could afford the rest of tuition on their own. Interest began at three percent a year after graduation and could usually be paid off in ten years. (Good 590-591) These statistics are a far cry from today’s, with student loan debt surpassing one trillion dollars and many graduates paying off loans well into middle age. As a result of the government shelling out billions of dollars in loans and inflation, colleges have had to increase their tuitions thus creating a college “bubble”. In the past year or so many political leaders have proposed plans to pay for two years of community college, such as President Obama, or for a full four years, such as Bernie Sanders, a frontrunner for the democratic candidacy. Even states like Tennessee,

As Zumeta (2005) reported, the decline in degree completion rates is, in part, due to institutions enrolling more disadvantaged students; however, elite institutions have higher graduation rates. Thus, “the surest route to success is to reduce the ‘risk profile’ of the students admitted” (p. 50). Because retention and graduation rates are significantly influenced by the characteristics of the students they admit, institutions would be forced to admit fewer disadvantaged students in order to meet accreditation standards. Rather than increasing diversity on college campuses, such actions would likely “further stratify student bodies socioeconomically across these different types of schools” (p. 50). This has far reaching implications for higher

The government may hold the view that spending federal taxes on the military is the safest and most efficient option because they know where their money is going to, however, Nicholas Barr argues that ”The historical record shows that tax finance has done little to widen access, while, as noted, tax finance is deeply regressive. If it is unfair to ask graduates to pay more of the cost of higher education, it is even more unfair to ask non-graduate taxpayers to do so.” It concerns the government, as well as citizens, who are taxpayers that their money goes to a good cause and it is right to believe that students are responsible for their education; if they pay towards a higher education, then their schooling will mean more to them so it would be a waste to pay tuition for students who are not responsible with their education or who may not even have a plan for their future and go to college, at most, to make connections and obtain a degree to easily find work in the future since most jobs require a college degree.

Seventy-four percent of students in the top 146 colleges in America come from the top quarter of socioeconomic societies while only three percent come from the bottom quarter (Wickenden 2). This statistic shows that low-income families in America do not have much of a chance for admission into these prestigious universities. Why is that so? Should prestigious universities lower their admission standards for these underprivileged students? Yes, Ivy League Schools should lower their admission standard for students coming from low-income families.

In the 1960s, the rate of students went high 8 million students at the end of the same decade. Also, at the beginning of the 1992 academic year there were 14.3 million of students in 3,535 institutions in the nation (Cooper). In the article “The working Class Gets Little Support for Training” its author talks about the money that goes to loans for students that are interested in going to college. It means that every year they have more opportunities and more money to study. Blue-collar workers should consider and analyze that there is a lot of money going into federal programs that distribute all these funds for students. This is very important for blue-collar workers to remember because it reinforces students to look for an opportunity for their education. In Buffenbarger’s view “Each year, over half a trillion dollars of local, state and federal monies is focused on

As a product becomes more common and available, its price goes down. The number of colleges in the United States has increased rapidly and their price has been rising dramatically since the beginning of the 1950s. According to FinAid, the tuitions rate has been increasing at about 8% on average annual basis, that is, two times the general inflation rate. How does this elevating in the education cost affect the low-income families? Does it confine the creativity and innovation of the students? What means is the Fed providing? How does the White House interfere to combat it? We will go through these concerns for a better understanding of the problem.

All over the United States, students clamor to pursue the dream of admittance into the country’s most elite universities. Whether it be the Ivy Leagues, top-ranked private institutions (i.e. USC, NYU, etc.), or even highly esteemed public universities (i.e. UC Berkeley, UCLA), acceptance into the most prestigious schools is often seen as the golden ticket to a better future. However, recently there has been a trend in higher education of seemingly ever-increasing costs to attend these institutions, for both domestic and international students. This increase in tuition largely affects the number of students who can actually afford to attend. As a result of these rapidly rising price tags on college education, students face a new dilemma unfamiliar

It has been proven that low income students are less likely to even apply or attend a four year college. In a recent study around 54% of lower income students attended a four year college, while 84% of upper and middle class students were enrolled (“Should More College” 1). Not only did the lower class student not have the funds to attend college, but their grades were

A school instruction has turned into a need in today's general public. Understudies all through the nation are focusing on their scholastics and are trying to get impeccable evaluations. Financing every understudy's training has turned out to be troublesome in today's economy. Along these lines, numerous understudies, instructors, and individuals think about whether free school educational cost ought to be allowed. I trust free school educational cost ought to be given and financed by the U.S. government since it will help understudies concentrate on their reviews, and urge them to work harder in school.

As new generations of individuals become enveloped into our modernized culture, it becomes clear how advanced we have become. From new innovations in our transportation methods to our advanced creation of breakthrough hospital treatments and emergency care systems, the progression of our race continues with no signs of ending. New ideas for advanced medical treatments and scientific machinery are constantly being theorized and integrated into our world at an alarmingly fast pace. The need for greater quantities of higher educated workers must be produced to meet the demands of the growth of various industries today, and what better way to produce these numbers than to utilize our higher education universities that are offered around the nation. While our government has the means to produce students effectively per year, the problem that arises is the large and devastating costs of attending these universities. This factor draws several middle class and low-income families away from sending their children to school. Various solutions to the pricing issue have been hypothesized but none have seen implementation as many school administrators and politicians do not agree on a stable way to provide education to a larger body of students without removing the student tuition that funds the universities’ staff and renovations of facilities and classrooms. The most controversial of these solutions is the idea of providing free education to all incoming and current students. This

Imagine a world with no college debt, a higher education equally available to all young people, and no college price barriers. These were the main goals of President Truman in his 1974 commission on Higher Education. Now, let us fast-forward forty years and take a look at the higher education system, which suffered an increase of one hundred and ten percent. “Eighty-five percent of college graduates are forced to move back home with their parents due to college debt, forty-two with debt currently live paycheck to paycheck, and seventeen percent delay buying a new home, and having children due to their student financial loans”(Surprising Side Effects of College Costs”). Higher education institutions increasing their costs have a greater impact on students than just being in debt; the increase I price also results in a countless number of students considering a different alternative for their higher education, future careers, and major life decisions.

College affordability is an important aspect to the United States educational system. Not only should public K-12 education be important, postsecondary education should also be easily available to everyone. Higher education should revert back to being seen as a public good. There is a great need to look back to the bipartisan legislation and cooperation that lead to college affordability, which in result, paid off economically. The importance of higher education policies and the consistent role of the government is once again considered in order to address what should be done to alleviate student burden.