Why Was King Arthur's Armor Important In The British Empire

of the Medieval knight. As being two essential elements of the Medieval period, it is seen that

According to Document D, “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm so they could easily draw their bow”. This shows that because the samurai had different fighting techniques, their armor had to fit appropriately and had to only cover the body parts, that weren’t in the way during a battle. In contrast, Document D also states, “Not only was the entire body covered, but knights also wore helmets, gloves, and shoes out of steel”. This shows that the knight was completely covered from head to toe because he used different weapons like swords, axes, and lances. Furthermore, when a knight fell of his horse, it would be harder for him to get up to his feet while fighting because of the heaviness of his armor. In conclusion, the knight's armor was different from the samurai’s, as well their relationship between their lord and

helmet with rounded surfaces to deflect blows. A removable or hinged visor was fitted to make breathing easier, and padding was riveted for additional comfort” (Hilliam 20). By the middle of the fourteenth century, the chainmail was basically abandoned and plate armor was much more desired. It had “glancing surfaces” and it protected knights from arrows far better than the mail (Hilliam 32). But over time, knights seek more extensive armor and simultaneously, bigger horses were needed in order to carry the weight and bigger lances made from tree trunks (Hilliam 17).

Likewise, knights wore “complete suits of plate armor, constructed from metal...wore helmets, gloves, and shoes of steel...a knight’s armor could weigh 40 to 60 pounds.” (Document D) Both samurais and European knights were protected by a heavy armor out of metal in battle; it can be inferred that both Japan and Europe found importance in protecting their warriors looking from the stringency of armor and protection. The reason for protecting their warriors would be due to the myriad of battles feudal Japan and Europe would have had to carry out. To ensure success in battle, they would’ve made further technological advances such as protective armor, ensuring better performance when battling. By protecting the warriors using this effective armor, both Japan and Europe would’ve been able to attain more as a whole and advance as a civilization - a common achievement carried out as well. Despite the many differences between Japanese samurais and European knights, the similarities outweighed these differences due to the homologous elements in their position in hierarchy and the use of protective armor in battle, leading to the success in both Japan and

Knights are one of the most mistaken figures of the medieval era due to fairytales and over exaggerated fiction novels. When medieval knights roamed the earth, it was known that they were only human and, like humans, had faults. These knights did not always live up to the standards designated by society. However, in The Canterbury Tales, the knight is revealed as a character that would now be considered a knight in shining armor, a perfect role model in how he acts and what he does. Modern day people see them as chivalrous figures instead of their actual role as mounted cavalry soldiers. As time passes, the idea of what a knight is changes from a simple cavalry soldier to a specific type of behavior.

The first thing we are covering is Training and Armor. They were very different in many ways. The Knights

At first knights and soldiers in the armies were of little social status. “Many knights in fact possessed little more than peasants” (Spielvogel 244). War was looked as kind of a barbaric act in the beginning and many knights could be found fighting each other. While some of this was tolerated, as they were seen as “defenders of society”, the Catholic Church decided that there should be some ground rules. At the start of the eleventh century, the church urged knights to take an oath to protect churches, and to not harm noncombatants. These rules allowed for battles to follow a civil path and to be carried out in a noble way.

In medieval Japan Samurais armor (According to Doc D by Terry Bennett) had an arm with no armor or very light armor, the reason for this was Samurai specialized in projectile warfare, and Samurai armor stayed the same for the rest of the Samurai area. In Europe the Knights used chainmail armor for quite some time, that is until crossbows and longbows became common, they had to change to metal armor that could be 60 pounds making it hard to get up if they were knocked down. Also the Knight's armor was made for shock warfare (According to Doc D from Art

First of all the knights and samurai both wore armor. It states in document D that in samurai armor they were put together with tiny iron scales. The knights had one big body suit of armor in one piece. This means that the armor they

As more powerful weapons such as crossbows and longbows became more common, the knights armor was no longer sufficient protection. The knights began to wear complete suits of plate armor constructed of metal. They also wore helmets, gloves and shoes of steel. A knight's armor could weigh up to 60 pounds. Lastly, the armor of the knights and the samurai is similar because they were made of similar material and they were both really heavy

Iron is a type of metal, thus making the armor build almost the same. This is significant because it means that samurai and knights were probably trying to protect themselves from the same types of attacks. Samurai and knight armor was also similar because it was made in a similar way, with plates. Plates signify that fighting and self-defense were important in both societies along with protection. This is because both types of armor allowed for flexibility, which allowed a warrior to fight better while still being protected.

For the samurai their armor “created a ‘shell’ that provide both mobility and protection.” The knight armor however “could weigh approximately 100 pounds”, according to source three. The samurai's armor leaves their right arm bear for more flexibility and protection. An armor with flexibility and protection would help them in battle. It would help them in battle because they can fight better while still having great protection. In addition,”A similarly constructed throat guard protected the wearer from deadly slashes to his throat,” according to source 3. The throat guard adds to the protection of the samurai. It is important in battle because if the knight tries to kill the samurai by slashing his throat, the samurai will be protected. This could allow the samurai to make a move and win. The samurai is very well protected and has much mobility. They can fight with flexibility and be protected at the same time. That is not the same for the

A knight’s armor was stronger than a samurai’s armor since the material had better durability than a samurai’s armor. The knight’s armor main materials were steel and chainmail. The process of producing the steel was cheaper and easier to make,while the samurai’s armor, consisting of bits of iron, leather and silk, could take months to make since silk was

Military speaking, it is often stated that the introducing of gunpowder and firearms triggered the decline of chivalry. Richard Kaeuper, on the contrary, explains that this improved military technology “may be too abrupt, for who would not be reluctant to sign a specific, dated death warrant to mark the end of [chivalry, which is] so persistent and so complex.”1 Moreover, it is not the first time that knights had to adapt to new military techniques. For instance, during the Hundred Year War (1337-1453) that opposed the French and English kingdoms, French knights were slaughtered by English crossbowmen during the battle of Agincourt in 1415. The French traditional model of the knight fighting with his sword was no longer sufficient to win a battle. Even before that, the English took on the chevauchée, a tactic based on raids to rampage the countryside and thus burn the villages and crops to prevent troops ' food supplies and also demoralizing the population. In response to that, the French used a similar technique of deployment of a small troop for precised raids. So, seeing knights ' military contribution as something constant and unchanging is incorrect. Consequently, knights could perfectly make use of gunpowder or still be valuable as leaders of troops, especially since Charny already valued knights who “are entrusted with the command of men-at-arms to lead them in combat as captains, constables, and marshals or in other offices concerned with the direction of the

Having an armor is a must for every soldiers in the battlefield. The soldiers will never know what will happen to them. That is why an armor is critical for them because it serves as their first layer of protection during their time the battlefield. In general, an ideal armor must be solid, strong, and comfortable to wear. On the other hand, an armor must be lightweight too because the soldiers will not wear an armor that drain their energy. Also, if possible, a flexible or bendable material can be one of the main composition for the armor. It will increase the comfortability of the armor for the soldiers. So that, they can perform better because they have a better equipment on them.