Why We Should Be Heading Towards Space Exploration

There is no denying that the cost of the national space program is significant, but that also does not mean that a small amount of money goes through jobs. If anything, if there was no explorations there would be a limited number of jobs, which would leave many people unemployed. Jobs that have workers as photographers, geoscientists, astronomers, and more would have to force themselves to do other occupations they may not enjoy. Many more would complain if the subject science did not have any follow up work in the future. This is where students and their education comes

For many years humans have been exploring space to discover the unknown and fuel their curious and adventurous nature, but the decision of whether space exploration is worth the cost is strongly debated. Due to various arguments and evidence space exploration is strongly supported is proven to be worth the cost. Some of these reasons include space exploration being able to expand our knowledge and it being able to generate wealth. With these reasons the argument of whether space exploration is worth the risk can be easily decided.

Many critics believe that NASA and space exploration should not be the main focus of the government. However, NASA is not just about flying rockets and putting men into space. There is science and engineering that is being developed to push humanity forward in life. This space program is essential to answering philosophical questions, creating new technology for practical everyday use, the international collaboration with other countries, and the long-term survival of the human

Three main clusters that are developed under this idea of space exploration is the benefits that are gained, ethical code and what it means with regard to the future of the human race. In this paper I will talk about what major projects are being worked on and who will benefit from these. This will also include what laws of space are and ethical code. This will also identify the differing viewpoints on space exploration and whether the big picture is worth the small steps being taken as to advancements in space technology and sciences.

Do you ever wonder where our knowledge about space comes from? Or where some of our necessities comes from? Space programs, like the National Aeronautics and Space Association, or commonly known as NASA, help us learn about space. Also, they aid us in creating innovative inventions with materials derived from space. To be able to continue growth, space programs must be funded by our government. With research, it can be said that space programs being funded by the government is important because we can advance in science, maintain jobs and infer about the future.

Space exploration is the future of humanity. As technology improves, new solutions arise to answer the question of sustaining life outside Earth. Many types of life support systems are developed and used on regular missions. However, determining the most suitable life support system for missions on Mars presents a challenge that this paper will solve. This article compares different life support systems using the Equivalent System Mass (ESM), which measures the relative cost of hardware based on its mass, volume, power, and cooling requirements. Bioregenerative systems are more practicable and secure for longer missions as they avoid the cost of constant food supply. However, the ESM shows that the higher initial cost of bioregenerative systems makes it way more expensive than the Physical/Chemical systems for long-duration missions. For short duration missions, the least expensive life support uses direct provision of water, oxygen and food from Earth. As Mars missions aren’t brief, the physical/chemical life support system is the most suitable. The ESM breakeven analysis confirms these well-known and widely accepted results. The conclusion makes the substantial past efforts to develop bioregenerative life support appear impractical.

Since the first space exploration in 1958, many controversial disputes have arisen questioning the necessity of space exploration. Some claim that space travel is simply not worth the risks regarding astronaut safety and economic costs. Others claim that the stars are a bridge for all nations, allowing us to solve problems, build wealth, and enhance life for people on Earth. Although space exploration has made a broad impact on the world we know today, I strongly believe that it is unnecessary to continue to fund programs involving space exploration when considering the extraordinary costs, unsafe conditions, and contamination problems which could potentially endanger us. Initially, manned exploration missions to space involved a greater amount

With space technology advanced in recent years, going to space or even conducting experiments in space is no longer an impossible thing to think about. But in the past, the space exploration programs are most funded by national institutions and even directly by governments. Because the private companies do not want to take the risk to explore the unknown domain, which cannot provide any direct economic benefits. Therefore, governments had to come into play to fund promising future science and technology.

First, space exploration is worth the cost because it will open our minds to new technology. John F. Kennedy said “ medical space research may open up new understandings of man’s relationship with the environment. “ This quote means that the people can know more about medical technology he also menconds the poor children that have medical problems. Also Dr. Vernikos says “ sidelight communication has changed life..”.

NASA has proven that space exploration is the key to the future. Technologies developed by NASA have been used in many different areas, from agriculture to computer science. These space related technologies and scientific knowledge have contributed to high-performance computing, robotics, scratch-resistant eyeglass lenses, breast cancer imaging, and satellites that support communication, navigation, weather observation, and other remote-sensing disciplines (Horowitz 2). Have you ever thought how your life would change if NASA never developed the modern cell phone? The differences would be noticeable immediately. The main argument against space exploration is that, under

It will be very difficult challenge to solve all of the financial problems related to space exploration, from overtaxing of citizens to creating internationally funded space exploration organizations such as the European Space Agency. It’s an indisputable fact that space exploration is expensive; according to Margaret McLean, a writer for the Makkula Center for Applied Ethics. “17 billion dollars of federal money was supplied to NASA in 2006, and about 5.3 billion of that goes towards space exploration. However, these figures to not take the amount of money spent on other government funded programs into account. According to the Office of Management and Budget only 6 cents of every federal dollar is spent on “other” federal services, including space as technology- as well as financial giants such as the judiciary system, agriculture, and “energy”a s w gile. So, it is obvious that those 6 cents are spread very thin. Meanwhile, 21 cents of that same dollar are spent on social security. Certainly more taxpayer money could be spent on space exploration , specialty technology. Although there are many different aspects to the issues of money involved in space exploration, it seems like most of them have relatively simple

Apart spending money, exploration of space has actually boosted the economy by creating more jobs. A study by Midwest Research Institute suggests that space research expenditures and our economy is strongly related, and is mutually beneficial to each other. Each dollar that have been spent on space exploration returns an average of over seven dollars in gross national product over an eighteen-year period following the expenditure. Another study of the macroeconomic impact of NASA research programs involving the relationship between NASA’s Space Shuttle program and employment California conducted by the Space Division of Rockwell International used an econometric model and estimated that the Space Shuttle program had generated an employment

For past decades of space exploration, radiation had been extremely dangerous and troublesome for the astronauts and engineers. Since excessive amounts of radiation are highly lethal, it is questioned if it is ever possible to place astronauts on the inhabitable terrain of Mars. However, in the modern world of technology, engineers at NASA Langley Research Center have been working in collaboration for the Radworks project to build protective habitats to help mitigate the issues of radiation, especially solar radiation from solar flares. Prototypes that were built became the potential blueprints of the human safe houses on Mars for more life threatening events such as a solar particle event that usually last around two days. In addition, the

Allocating funds to space exploration has been a controversial topic for decades. On one hand, the funds allocated to space exploration would have been better used if spared to education or health care, according to many people and political groups. On the other hand, scientists argue that our life on earth depends on outer space in many aspects, and hence, increasing our knowledge about this topic is as important as any other field. This essay will analyze both points of view.

The mysterious vastness beyond Earth has allured many scientists to explore and contribute much of their effort to the understanding of space. Although humans have been looking up at space for thousands of years, the physical exploration of this frontier has been only going on for the past few decades. Our current understanding of space is unparalleled to any time before in our history, but we still only know a small fraction of what there is to learn. Governments around the world spend about $40 billion dollars a year (Rockefeller, 2010) hoping to undertake tasks such as “human exploration of the solar system” to discovering the origins of life itself (Tatarewicz, 2009, p. 531). Recently, the private sector has also shown interest in space exploration in order to engage in profitable activities such as harnessing minerals from asteroids. Although it is easy to debate about the benefits and negatives of space exploration in its entirety, it is simpler focus on one aspect of it - the direct effect it has to those down on Earth. Rather than trying to decide whether or not going to other planets is worth it, this paper will argue about the value of the terrestrial benefits of space exploration. It is an important topic to think about as programs such as space exploration change lives and help acquire knowledge. Despite the large costs associated with space exploration, the multitude of discoveries in the past few decades has greatly improved daily life on Earth, the jobs the