Why We Shouldn T Animals Be Used In Research

In conclusion, scientists and researchers shouldn’t test on animals because it hurts them hurts them. When scientists make animals have pain and the react to it they continue to cause them more pain. Most scientists and researchers buy and breed animals to do tests on them and they shouldn’t because it isn’t right and they have no right to do so. When most animals are tested on they die or get really sick to the point where they might need to be put down. Animals testing should be banned and scientists should stop breeding test

Animal testing harms and violates the rights of the animal itself. Some people say it is okay because the animal does not know the difference between right from wrong. Animal testing creates a traumatizing experience for the animal. Their bodies become damaged from all the burning and allergic reactions they have to undergo from the chemicals. The animals do not know what is going on, nor do they know where they are because they have been taken out of their natural habitats. The change in environment is new to the animals, making them forced to accept the new area they would call home. Animal testing prohibits an animal from being free. Is it okay to test on animals because they lack the ability to know if the testing being done to them is moral or not? Animals do not have the ability to make their own moral judgment. It is not fair to harm an animal because they are living organisms that play an important role in the ecosystem.

Animal Testing is uncertain and hard. Animals go through a series of tests are very painful, most of the time they are not even given anything for pain. Some product tests require the same painful procedure on a daily basis over a weeks' time. Most tests on animals cause permanent injury or even death. The tests performed on animals are not always reliable. A medicine that may be safe with animals may not be for human beings. For example, aspirin is toxic to cats, so if we were to test this medication on cats, it would not help to determine if this was a safe product for human beings. One alternative to animal testing is human testing, if we are looking to find out if the product works on humans, we should test them on humans. That case "No

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. There have been past occasions where drugs passed on animals weren’t even safe. There is no excuse for animal testing in today’s techy world, there are now many alternatives for animal testing that would put an end to the pain and suffering endured by these innocent animals during human testing.

I think we shouldn't test on animals. Animals are born to grow up and live a happy, healthy life not get tested on for mascara and lipstick. Animals die and get sick everyday due to animal testing. Some animals go blind, deaf, lose their legs or ears, make their young have birth defects, or worse they could die. They whine and get hurt, the scientists just continue their work, it is like they have no heart for these animals.

To those who aren’t animal lovers, it is understandable that they would not have much of an opinion on this. But, these animals that are being tested are receiving “Cruel and Unusual punishment” and it is not leading to cures for serious illnesses. So, to those who are animal lovers, it can seem very wrong that a dog or cat, which could be part of a family, is being killed for no purpose. Animals have about 95% of the same genes humans do. So, although this sounds really close, it is not close enough to develop effective drugs for human use after testing them on animals. Humans do not have fur and four legs, and no animal can talk, feel, and understand. Find another source for this para.

Scientists say animal testing helps scientists advance in more scientific understanding, by using animals as models and mimicking the complexity of a human. This is exactly why we shouldn't use animals to mock a human. Because a human is extremely complex, the complexity and intricacy is precisely why animals are not good models for human medicine. We differ from animals genetically and metabolically, so data we obtain from animals cannot be assumed to work for humans. For example, cancer was cured for mice, but when tried on humans, it failed - because of the fact that we differ from

Animal testing has been going on for years; however, few question the ethics of testing medicines that would cure human diseases on animals. Various animals being tested in labs and cruelly force them to be a host of harmful diseases negatively affect their health. Animal testing is cruel and unusual punishment and should discontinue. Animal experimentation is a subject that many know of but don’t know much about. Although it is a big topic, people still don’t pay much attention to it because of their lack of information. Experimenting is a cruel process that causes many innocent animals to suffer. Many cases of violations towards experimenting have been found as well. Testing on animals is unnecessary when laying down the

In conclusion, animal testing is wrong and it needs to stop. These animals are dying from things that can easily be avoided. The animals that are tested on don't always bring accurate results. People have talked about their experience with being tested on, yet we continue to use animals. These animals are innocent and most of them only know life I'm the testing facility. That is no way the

Animals are not a reliable benchmark for testing because animals and humans have a completely different biological make up. In fact, PETA said that 72% of drugs shown to be effective in humans, have a different response in humans or are harmful to the body (Animal Testing Is Bad Science Point/Counterpoint). Disregarding the fact that some animal testing trials make it to human trials about 100,000 humans lose lives each year from taking prescriptions originally tested on animals(Animal Aid). Concluding that even if tests were to be done on animals, the drugs are not always safe, proving that animal testing can take more lives than needed and is horrifically

Animal testing is arrogant and incredibly cruel. Like us, animals can feel pain and fear ,but also excitement and satisfaction. Close contact with animals shows that they look forward to some extents ,and can clearly get a lot of enjoyment from their lives ,from basking in the sun ,exercising ,or eating their favorite food. Therefore having an animal used for testing can ruin its life by not experiencing what other animals go through. Animals are way happy when they can enjoy and roam around freely. Taking wild animals from their habitat for science testing can effective the wildlife population ,because it can mess up the wildlife

To conclude I think that animals testing is wrong because it harms the animals and they don't have to test animals. There are many ways to test using computer models where no living being is harmed and it is more cost effective. The more we spread awareness of this terrible practice the sooner we can end animal

First and foremost, testing on animals has led to advancements in numerous areas of medical treatment that has saved thousands of people since the testings began. How? Well, animals have a very similar body structure to humans, which makes them prime examples for testing medications. Chimpanzees have 99% of the same DNA as humans do, and even mice are 98% genetically similar to the human race. Animals and humans both share the same complex, orderly body systems, and for this reason, they are readily used to study animal tissues and the way they react to certain procedures. The tissues can then be compared to the way human tissues would react without having to actually use these human tissues. ”It is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective," said Dr. Paul Drayson when talking about the advantages of animal testing and making sure that medical procedures and medications are safe for humans.

Many animal activists argue against testing on animals; however, it is not as cruel as it seems. Testing is not as harmful on the animals as people may think, and it has a great purpose. Animal testing continues to advance society in a number of ways. Laboratory testing of animals should not be stopped because it is an effective way to test drugs, leads to important discoveries that save human lives, and it benefits the animals as well.

Animal testing is an old fashioned way of testing medications and products to ensure that they are safe for humans. It is a way to further our society, without inflicting any harm to our race, but in today's society, it is no longer a required option for testing. For one, it is very cruel to animals. We should not be self involved and only think about ourselves. The world cannot survive that way. We need animals in the world, and if we continue treating them in this harmful manner they will no longer be able to provide for the world’s environment. Also, animal testing has been proven to not be as effective as people may think. In the Baltimore Sun writer Kelly Overton claims that “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials.” This demonstrates that animal testing is no longer required in today’s society. We have better ways to test with new technology, instead of with animal testing that has been proven to be highly ineffective. Overall, in the past animal testing may have been needed to save