Why Were The Nuremberg Trials Controversial?

Post World War II, many Nazi leaders were put on trial by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. At the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials Speer was charged with, conspiracy to commit crimes against peace, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity and war crimes. Twelve out of twenty-one accused Nazi leaders were sentenced to death. Speer was found guilty but he was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment, thus escaping the hangman’s noose. Historian Van der Vat

At the end of this trial, The International tribunal found all but 3 guilty. 12 men were sentenced to death, one in absentia, and the rest were put in prison. The prison sentences went from at least 10 years to life behind bars. 10 of the condemned were excuted by hanging on October 16, 1946. One of Hitler’s right hand man and the commander of the Luftwaffe commited suicide with a Cyannide pill the night before his execution.

The Nuremburg Trials were trials held by allied forces to accuse a system of government for war crimes after World War II. These crimes dealt with invading nations, violating the Treaty of Versailles, and primarily “crimes against humanity.” They were later known as the Holocaust, where many victims were deported, enslaved, and executed. The victims of the Holocaust were primarily Jewish, Polish, Gypsies, and handicapped elderly who were considered dangerous. The International Military Tribunal, called the prosecutors consisted of lawyers and judges from the United States, France, and Soviet Union. The purpose of the trial was to decide how to prosecute the judges that did not do their job of serving justice to a multitude of innocent individuals

In Nuremburg, Germany, 13 trials were held in order to bring justice to Nazi war criminals from 1945 to 1949. The United States, France, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union contributed to the persecution of 22 Nazi Criminals in which 12 were sentenced to death. Nazi Party officials, high-ranking military officers, German industrialists, lawyers, and doctor’s defendants were charged with crimes against peace and humanity for their treacherous persecution of German-Jewish people and other horrid things the Axis Powers took part of. The crimes started very shortly after Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany in 1933. Adolf Hitler and his Nazi party created strategies to persecute the German-Jewish people along with others who were an alleged

I believe this is true and I find it amusing how the Nazis took the law and judgement upon themselves and punished the Jews with authority they didn’t have, and then all but 3 of the 21 who pleaded “not guilty” were convicted. In my opinion, it is crazy how some of the defendants could deny their unjust and atrocious actions when put on trial. In fact, I would want to be punished. Finally, in regards to the outcome, while I wish the 3 that were not convicted were somehow punished, I feel that because of their actions, their thoughts and memories would punish them. Also, while it seems the guilty party deserves the death penalty, is it really the place of man to decide when a person’s life is over? Perhaps life in prison or life in a work camp would be suitable, but, in my opinion, it isn’t the right of man to end the life of another. All in all, I believe the Nuremberg Trials were well handled by Robert Jackson and the other

This article provides information on the trials for the accused war criminals during WW2. There are few pictures, and the author is unknown. They give some detail about how the United States, United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union helped play part in the persecution of the war criminals. It talks about the reasons many were prosecuted and what happened to most of the war criminals after liberation. This article also gives the outcome of the trials. The article is great for someone who is writing a paper on the holocaust, and the initial website where the article is located is a creditable source.

After World War II, the victorious associates made a decision to hold a trail for the defeated Nazi officials. These Trails continued from November 20, 1945 till October 1, 1946. In these Tails, defendant use Nuremberg Defense, a legal strategy employed by many of the defendants at the Nuremberg war crimes trials seeking to convict Nazi perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the Second World War, as a defense by claiming they were not guilty of charges against them as they were simply following orders (Rationalwiki). Even though the victors claimed that they would give the defendant a fair trial, on closer examination anyone can see that in reality, these trails were biased and were a victor’s justice (A

In the Nuremberg trials, many verdicts have been made. A few major trails had been trialled, a man named Ernst Kaltenbrunner had been one of the most feared men that has stepped foot in Nazi, Germany. He was known as the Highest ranked leader next to hitler himself. Ernst Kaltenbrunner had been mostly apart of the camps during the holocaust, he had gained a lot of his power year after year due to promotions of working in the Nazi’s Party. In the 4 trials Kaltenbrunner had been in trialled guilty which was then transferred to a death penalty.

The Nuremberg Trials, were set up by the Allies to hold the Nazis accountable for what they had done during World War II. The Nuremberg Trials contained 13 trials, thus many were executed, put to death sentence, received life in prison and, received prison time with varying lengths.

Althoughthe Nuremberg Trials were designed to punish the Nais and to offer some sort of closer to the victims, there was one major problem that clogged the system. The problem was that there were

Back in the times of the Holocaust, after the war took place, some of those who were responsible for the crimes committed, were taken to trial. Those trials took place on 1945 and 1946 in Nuremberg, Germany. The Nuremberg trials conveyed to open consideration the most noticeably bad of the Nazi abominations. “Judgment at Nuremberg” breathes life into those trials. Right up until today, the Nuremberg trials remain as a model for universal criminal tribunals, due in huge measure to the spotlight tossed at them by Mann's emotional translation of the notable occasions. Mann's staggering sympathy strikes at the heart of human, enduring his accomplishment has been to reaffirm humankind and equity in the wake of unspeakable malice; as the world remembers

The three American Judges agreed that the justification of self defence for the Nazis did not properly justify their case causing disbelief, continuing with stating that if the justification of self defence was repeated in different scenario the world would result in all out war. All the defendants were convicted; thirteen received the death sentence including Ohlendorf. The thoughts regarding how the trials were going to be balanced and fair were assimilated with American laws and

The two remaining leaders of the Nazi party, tried at Nuremberg, were Hermann Goering and Rudolf Hess. Since Hitler, Himmler and Gobbels were dead, these two men were considered the symbol of the evils of Nazism. Although prosecutors sought to cross-examining both men to tell all they knew about the Nazi's policies, Goering tried from the beginning, to discredit the International Military Tribunal and the trials. Hess, on the other hand, feigned amnesia and avoided being cross-examined. Other defendants tried at Nuremberg were Joachim von Ribbentrop, Field Marshall Wihelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenburg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick. These men were considered "Nazi thugs" and their trials did not last as long and were not seen as

The Nuremberg Trials was a series of 13 trials that lasted from 1945-1946. Twenty-four individuals were held responsible for the holocaust. Three committed suicide before they could be put on trial. These three individuals were named, Adolf hitler, Heinrich Himmler, and Joseph Goebbels. Also, Hitler’s wife committed suicide with him. This all took place in the year of 1945.

On 8th August, 1945, shortly after the end of World War II in May of 1945, the Allied governments entered into a joint agreement establishing the International Military Tribunal for the purpose of trying those responsible for the war atrocities. Whereas some 5,000 Nazi’s were charged with war crimes, the Nuremberg trials were designed specifically to prosecute high ranking Nazi officials with whom the authority for the commission of heinous atrocities rested.