preview

Why Woman Smile Analysis

Decent Essays

Analysis Argument Essay (Why Woman Smile, 1st Draft) Amy Cunningham, an editor and author from New York, wrote an article “Why Women Smile” to emphasize on how women are no longer smiling because it is a natural thing, but rather an everyday habit. Coupled with Cunningham’s supported reasons of using logos and ethos, she also uniquely brings in her personal experience by having ethos, making her argument more relatable. A long side with that, societies’ past and present impact on today’s world about women was also included as Cunningham put her own take into proving her point. Although this may be true, there were some fallacies found in her argument, leading it to the lack of fully portraying the audience. Cunningham takes on her personal …show more content…

Cunningham believes that a smile does not only contains a positive emotion. She was being informative when she states that people from different cultures also smiles when they are frighten, miserable, or embarrassed. Emphasizing her point further, she provided an example from Japan. Correspondingly, Cunningham used research and facts as she addressed “Psychologist Paul Ekman, the head of the University of California’s Human Interaction Lab in San Francisco, has identified 18 distinct types of smiles, including those that shows misery, compliance, fear and contempt.” (263). Aside from using logos to enhance her argument, Cunningham also uses ethos in considered to make the audience feels more certain when reading her article. Notwithstanding, her point of view, she after then states a sentence that is considered to be a fallacy. Introduction to her next paragraph, she wrote “Evidently, a woman’s happy, willing deference, is something the world wants visibly.”, and example of hasty generalization. Though it was said evidently, there was no follow up reasons to support that the worlds wants it clearly. A woman’s happiness is something that not everyone to embrace. Therefore, it is yet another stereotyped that the authors support but did not established through …show more content…

The Renaissance famous painting, Mona Lisa, painted by Leonardo da Vinci, was created from depicting a resemblance of the complexity from a woman’s smile, as she believes was the most influential example. Through the signs of logos, she brought in history about woman during the Renaissance times. As Cunningham wrote “[….] immoderate laughter was once considered one of the more conspicuous vices a woman could have, and mirth was downright sinful.” (263). By writing that example, she wants the audience to understand that these things that are neglecting woman has happened long before present time. Furthermore, Virgin Mary’s smile at Christ’s birth was mentioned during her argument as she states that “The only smile deemed appropriate on a privileged woman’s face was the serene Virgin Mary at Christ’s birth.” To point out her argument by using religion, she showed that Virgin Mary was an only woman that was not considered sinful when she smile serenely when Christ was born. However, Cunningham gave off a fallacy in her writing, circular reasoning, as she said that woman are expected to smile no matter where they go. She repeatedly states that since you are a woman, smiling was just another important expression that you have to do nonstop. Since Cunningham did not states the reasons to support her

Get Access