Why Women Should Be Allowed In The Military

Upon the acceptance of the Combat Exclusion Law, each military service was to define their policies to determine where females could and could not serve. What this means to the Army in particular is that “all jobs except those having the highest probability of engaging in direct combat” (Ferber, 1987, p. 4) will be opened to women in the Army. The Navy, Marines and Air Force have all had to evaluate the exclusion laws as well and establish criteria as appropriate.

The statement that is thrown around more than not when it comes to this controversial subject is “Women are not built like men, does this mean we are changing the standards for them”. This is a very real statement and it can be looked at from multiple angles. Ideally no standards should be changed at all in regards to what physical demands that Military requires from men and women in their respective branch APFT’s. Units should not increase the

Throughout our nation’s history, women have played an important role in the military. It has not been until recently however, that women have been able to fully

Over the past few years, there has been huge discussions when the topic of equality for women who have joined the military is being brought up. Being that gender equality is a big thing in the military now, I decided to chose this topic and discuss how I feel about it. According to the United States constitution, all men are created equal and this does not exclude women. One of the main things I learned is that equality for women in the military is a major issue. There should be no gender inequality in the United States military period. Most jobs are now open to women that were once allowed for only a man to do but when it comes to something such as the military, it should have always been that way No one should be told they can’t do something when it requires fighting for your country. Even back when men were drafted in the military, women should have been able to get drafted as well. You would think the military would take any and everybody that is willing to fight for his or her country simply because it would make our job easier as a whole. Frequently, women are stereotyped as feeble and incapable of doing certain things. Nevertheless, this should not be applied in any kind of career, particularly in the military.

In conclusion I feel that women should not be mandatory drafted in the military not because they aren’t necessarily good enough just that there is major issues to why they shouldn’t. They want to have a baby, cannot really achieve to what is required (in that means by being able to carry a heavy man or equipment), might not be emotionally prepared for what will happen in they end up in war, and also might not be prepared to be yelled at (emotions). In that case women should not be drafted in the military they honestly won’t be able to handle

Women now make up 14 percent of the active-duty military in the United States, which is up from 1.6 percent, 25 years prior. (Christian Science Monitor, 1). In 1948, President Truman signed the Women 's Armed Services Integration Act which created the role of women in the military. This law meant that each branch of the service was allowed to have one female Colonel (Byfield, 12). As of 2015, there are many women who serve as Generals and Admirals. All of these roles are non-combative. Even though some women can do anything a man can do, the vast majority can not, therefore making it an unsafe idea to place these women into combat positions.

The Women's Armed Services Integration Act says, “Effective the date of enactment of this title, there is established in the Regular Army a Women’s Army Corps, which shall perform such services as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Army” . This bill is saying that women are now able to perform tasks in the army with regulations set in place from the Secretary of Army. This bill became one of the first women’s rights bills. Today the women in the army are still fighting a war against gender discrimination. No matter the gender, going into the military requires great physical fitness. Women wanting to join must be between 17 and 34 years old, 58 to 80 inches tall, and weigh 91 to 236 pounds. The women must be able to take a physical fitness test including pushups, sit-ups and jogging. Depending on age they must be able to perform seven to 19 pushups, 26 to 53 sit-ups, and must complete a two-mile jog within 18 minutes and 54 seconds. If a woman fails at any part of these requirements they will not be enlisted . These are the only requirement’s that differ from men to women. The other qualifications include; US citizenship, a high school diploma or GED, a good health exam, and a score of 31 or better on a test called Armed Forces Vocational Aptitude Battery exam (ASVAB) . One of the current issues that was passed regarding women in the army was a bill that allowed women to serve in the front lines. This includes,

For push ups, they couldn’t put their knees down. The only difference about how they were treated compared to the men was that they could take birth control pills, and when they shower or change, there will be a sheet put up, separating the genders. The women who signed up for Ranger School are close to completing it, therefore that proves that women can do activities with the same level of intensity as men. In addition, this was the first year that Ranger School wasn’t open for men only, and already, two women have gone far. Although there were 17 that didn’t pass, officials are still going to use the statistics of women successfully completing training camps. This school isn’t the only military school to allow women. For example, women can join The Marines. I don’t understand why some men just can’t accept that women want to do the same things as them, but still don’t let them. Why would you limit someone that would do nothing but help you/ Maybe if they put a little more faith into women, we would feel more comfortable and succeed more than we already are. If a woman wants to do something that’s considered a “male profession”, they either have to prove why they should work there, or just get made fun of it. Women aren’t getting treated the same as men, and they should be. There is no reason they shouldn’t be. There are so many influential women out there, and

The United States Army was founded on June 14, 1775, and since this day women have helped nurture this great branch into what is known today as the largest and oldest United States Military service. (“Women”) The US Army is consisted of about 452,064 enlisted soldiers and 87,610 officers. This total of 539,675 makes up 37.8% of all of the military branches. ("Demographics”) As time has carried on more and more women are looking to serve the country in the Army. While women have many skills and abilities to offer, there is still a major issue that needs to be addressed. Double standards for women in the Army has created a disservice to not only the females but the entire Army. In order to have a more efficient armed force, standards for men and women should be equivalent.

Women such as 1st Lt. Shaye Haver and Cpt. Kristen Griest, whom had completed the notoriously challenging Army Ranger program, are perfect examples of women that counter old stereotypes that women are weak and have no place serving in the military. While it may be true that, considering average physiology, women may have somewhat less bone mass and a lower capacity to develop muscle mass, the military does not require women to have a male bodybuilder’s muscle mass to gain entry or even excel. Beyond this, women have comparable fundamental potential for a military role. For all practical purposes, women have a comparable potential to train and succeed in the military, while gender roles, stereotypes, and treatment appear to have comparable or

As a result, allowing women in these units will lower the physical standard. They made this claim not because it has been proving, but based on gender differences. Also, the population sample they use to make such claim is very minuscule. This claim derogates women, and contradicts the Equal Opportunity (EO) program the armed forces have been determinedly implemented. I believe that any women should allow to have any job in the USA armed forces as long she is qualified. Furthermore, receiving equitable training as the men counterpart, and qualifying before assign to a units will eliminate any modification to the physical standard. Above all, due high technology battlefield technical expertise and decision-making skills are more valuable than simple brute

First of all, women are not as strong as men. The average twenty year old woman is as strong as the average fifty year old man. Also, the amount of women who have the same upper-body strength, stamina, and endurance as a well-developed man is shockingly small. In the military, the standards of fitness are made for men, so women are at greater risk of injury trying to reach them. Even

The standards for females in their respective military branches have always been subjected to lower terms rather than the set of standards set for males, as noted in the Military APFT (Army Physical Fitness Test) policy; for example, in the bracket of 17-21 years old, to pass females need 19 pushups and males need 42 pushups (Appendix A). However, for the first time in the military, Ranger school qualifications are not being subjected to these lower terms as the military normally does. Females are finally allowed to try out for the toughest United States Army Military School that the military has to offer. These selected females have shown that not only do they have what it takes to accomplish the toughest Army military school there is to this date, but they were also able to do it without the United States military branches or society lowering the standards for their qualifications. This is surprising since the females’ standards are lowered in every other branch of the U.S. Military. The selected females who passed the Ranger school qualifications have what it takes to be able to join their Ranger brothers (front lines) and should be given the right to join the elite 75th Ranger Regiment. They have earned and deserved the right to go to the Ranger Combat Zone, just like their male counterparts who passed the same program. As Admiral Jon Greenert stated in the CNN

In the article “Women in the Military” mentions the women have been joining the military since 2000. Besides that, women who serve the military do require a lot of physical requirement because of stereotypical thinking of women being weak. Even more, some commanders want more women to participate in the use of technology. Women tried fighting this kind of idea but managed to fail; In 2003 young women named Lynch was the only survivor of an insurgent attack in Iraq, which motivated more women to join the army. Even more, women that join the army also experienced harassment and rape. After these incidents, it was decided that the military training was not going to be co-ed basic training. By doing this the pentagon announced in 2013 that they

Not only are women physically weaker, but also they have many physical problems to deal with.